Literature DB >> 25388511

Reliability of the volatile agent consumption display in the Draeger Primus™ anesthesia machine.

Peter Biro1, Oliver Kneschke2, Oliver M Theusinger2.   

Abstract

Knowledge of the consumed amount of volatile anesthetic (VA) expressed in liquid agent is necessary to enable agent sparing dosing measures and for billing purposes. The widespread Draeger Primus™ anesthesia machine displays in its logbook the amount of consumed VA at the end of each anesthesia, but the reliability of this parameter is yet unknown. The objective was to evaluate the precision and reliability of the inbuilt VA consumption display in Draeger Primus™ anesthesia machines as compared with the gold standard of weighing the vaporizer before and after anesthesia. In this prospective laboratory investigation we compared the VA consumption displayed by the Draeger Primus™ anesthesia machine with measured vaporizer weight differences before and after 10 sevoflurane and 10 desflurane anesthesias. We assessed the average difference and spread of values between the predicted (displayed) and measured (control) values for VA consumption. The displayed sevoflurane consumption overestimated the measured values by 4.3 ± 5.4 ml (7.6%). The displayed desflurane consumption underestimated the measured values by -3.5 ± 6.3 ml (6.2%). Nine from 10 sevoflurane pairs of values and all desflurane pairs of values were within ±1.96 SD. The displayed VA consumption calculations for sevoflurane and desflurane in the Draeger Primus™ are sufficiently reliable to estimate the pharmacoeconomic impact of VA delivery during inhalational anesthesia.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Consumption; Desflurane; Pharmacoeconomics; Sevoflurane; Volatile anesthestics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25388511     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-014-9639-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  11 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Measuring the costs of inhaled anaesthetics.

Authors:  G G Lockwood; D C White
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Pharmacoeconomic viewpoints on volatile anaesthesia--"much ado about nothing?".

Authors:  D Rapeport; S Harper; P Flisberg
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.669

4.  Low-flow anaesthesia. Practice, cost implications and acceptability.

Authors:  S M Cotter; A J Petros; C J Doré; N D Barber; D C White
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Fresh gas flow is not the only determinant of volatile agent consumption: a multi-centre study of low-flow anaesthesia.

Authors:  J F Coetzee; L J Stewart
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Pharmacoeconomics of volatile inhalational anaesthetic agents: an 11-year retrospective analysis.

Authors:  L Weinberg; D Story; J Nam; L McNicol
Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.669

Review 7.  Characteristics of anesthetic agents used for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.

Authors:  Edmond I Eger
Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 2.637

Review 8.  [Volatile anesthetics].

Authors:  M Loscar; P Conzen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  Cost analysis of two anaesthetic machines: "Primus®" and "Zeus®".

Authors:  Jose Hinz; Nadine Rieske; Bernd Schwien; Aron F Popov; Prashant N Mohite; Oliver Radke; Armin Bartsch; Michael Quintel; Klaus Züchner
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2012-01-04

10.  Inhalational anaesthesia with low fresh gas flow.

Authors:  Christian Hönemann; Olaf Hagemann; Dietrich Doll
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-07
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2015 end of year summary: anesthesia.

Authors:  Jan F A Hendrickx; Andre De Wolf; Stanley Skinner
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Accuracy of inhaled agent usage displays of automated target control anesthesia machines.

Authors:  Alexander Dehouwer; Rik Carette; Simon De Ridder; Andre M De Wolf; Jan F A Hendrickx
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.502

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.