Literature DB >> 25388413

Increased reaction time variability in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder as a response-related phenomenon: evidence from single-trial event-related potentials.

Christopher W N Saville1,2, Bernd Feige3, Christian Kluckert1, Stephan Bender4, Monica Biscaldi1, Andrea Berger5, Christian Fleischhaker1, Klaus Henighausen1, Christoph Klein1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased intra-subject variability (ISV) in reaction times (RTs) is a promising endophenotype for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and among the most robust hallmarks of the disorder. ISV has been assumed to represent an attentional deficit, either reflecting lapses in attention or increased neural noise. Here, we use an innovative single-trial event-related potential approach to assess whether the increased ISV associated with ADHD is indeed attributable to attention, or whether it is related to response-related processing.
METHODS: We measured electroencephalographic responses to working memory oddball tasks in patients with ADHD (N = 20, aged 11.3 ± 1.1) and healthy controls (N = 25, aged 11.7 ± 1.1), and analysed these data with a recently developed method of single-trial event-related potential analysis. Estimates of component latency variability were computed for the stimulus-locked and response-locked forms of the P3b and the lateralised readiness potential (LRP).
RESULTS: ADHD patients showed significantly increased ISV in behavioural ISV. This increased ISV was paralleled by an increase in variability in response-locked event-related potential latencies, while variability in stimulus-locked latencies was equivalent between groups. This result held across the P3b and LRP. Latency of all components predicted RTs on a single-trial basis, confirming that all were relevant for speed of processing.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the increased ISV found in ADHD could be associated with response-end, rather than stimulus-end processes, in contrast to prevailing conceptions about the endophenotype. This mental chronometric approach may also be useful for exploring whether the existing lack of specificity of ISV to particular psychiatric conditions can be improved upon.
© 2014 Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADHD; EEG; event-related potential; reaction time; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25388413     DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0021-9630            Impact factor:   8.982


  19 in total

Review 1.  A Systematic Review on Feature Extraction in Electroencephalography-Based Diagnostics and Therapy in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Pasquale Arpaia; Attilio Covino; Loredana Cristaldi; Mirco Frosolone; Ludovica Gargiulo; Francesca Mancino; Federico Mantile; Nicola Moccaldi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Genetic influences on phase synchrony of brain oscillations supporting response inhibition.

Authors:  Viktor Müller; Andrey P Anokhin; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 3.  Research Review: Use of EEG biomarkers in child psychiatry research - current state and future directions.

Authors:  Sandra K Loo; Agatha Lenartowicz; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 8.265

4.  Spontaneous Fluctuations in Sensory Processing Predict Within-Subject Reaction Time Variability.

Authors:  Maria J Ribeiro; Joana S Paiva; Miguel Castelo-Branco
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Effects of caffeine on reaction time are mediated by attentional rather than motor processes.

Authors:  Christopher W N Saville; H M de Morree; Neil M Dundon; S M Marcora; C Klein
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-12-23       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Neurophysiological Correlates of Attentional Fluctuation in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Celeste H M Cheung; Gráinne McLoughlin; Daniel Brandeis; Tobias Banaschewski; Philip Asherson; Jonna Kuntsi
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Neuronal Intra-Individual Variability Masks Response Selection Differences between ADHD Subtypes-A Need to Change Perspectives.

Authors:  Annet Bluschke; Witold X Chmielewski; Moritz Mückschel; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Neural mechanisms underlying successful and deficient multi-component behavior in early adolescent ADHD.

Authors:  Annet Bluschke; Krutika Gohil; Maxi Petzold; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.881

9.  Shared and Disorder-Specific Event-Related Brain Oscillatory Markers of Attentional Dysfunction in ADHD and Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Giorgia Michelini; Viryanaga Kitsune; Isabella Vainieri; Georgina M Hosang; Daniel Brandeis; Philip Asherson; Jonna Kuntsi
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Genome-wide association study reveals novel genetic locus associated with intra-individual variability in response time.

Authors:  Ari Pinar; Ziarih Hawi; Tarrant Cummins; Beth Johnson; Marc Pauper; Janette Tong; Jeggan Tiego; Amy Finlay; Marieke Klein; Barbara Franke; Alex Fornito; Mark A Bellgrove
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 6.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.