Literature DB >> 25388125

Using the jackknife for estimation in log link Bernoulli regression models.

Stuart R Lipsitz1, Garrett M Fitzmaurice, Alex Arriaga, Debajyoti Sinha, Atul A Gawande.   

Abstract

Bernoulli (or binomial) regression using a generalized linear model with a log link function, where the exponentiated regression parameters have interpretation as relative risks, is often more appropriate than logistic regression for prospective studies with common outcomes. In particular, many researchers regard relative risks to be more intuitively interpretable than odds ratios. However, for the log link, when the outcome is very prevalent, the likelihood may not have a unique maximum. To circumvent this problem, a 'COPY method' has been proposed, which is equivalent to creating for each subject an additional observation with the same covariates except the response variable has the outcome values interchanged (1's changed to 0's and 0's changed to 1's). The original response is given weight close to 1, while the new observation is given a positive weight close to 0; this approach always leads to convergence of the maximum likelihood algorithm, except for problems with convergence due to multicollinearity among covariates. Even though this method produces a unique maximum, when the outcome is very prevalent, and/or the sample size is relatively small, the COPY method can yield biased estimates. Here, we propose using the jackknife as a bias-reduction approach for the COPY method. The proposed method is motivated by a study of patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bias-reduction; copy method; maximum likelihood; non-convergence; relative risk regression

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25388125      PMCID: PMC5663445          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  10 in total

1.  Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes.

Authors:  Louise-Anne McNutt; Chuntao Wu; Xiaonan Xue; Jean Paul Hafner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Estimation of relative risk and prevalence ratio.

Authors:  Anamaria Savu; Qi Liu; Yutaka Yasui
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Quasi-likelihood estimation for relative risk regression models.

Authors:  Rickey E Carter; Stuart R Lipsitz; Barbara C Tilley
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 5.  Minimizing risk in colon and rectal surgery.

Authors:  Robert A Kozol; Neil Hyman; Scott Strong; R Lawrence Whelan; Charles Cha; Walter E Longo
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Relative risk regression: reliable and flexible methods for log-binomial models.

Authors:  Ian C Marschner; Alexandra C Gillett
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  Binomial regression in GLIM: estimating risk ratios and risk differences.

Authors:  S Wacholder
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings.

Authors:  W D Owens; J A Felts; E L Spitznagel
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies.

Authors:  Philipp Kirchhoff; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Dieter Hahnloser
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2010-03-25

10.  The better colectomy project: association of evidence-based best-practice adherence rates to outcomes in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Alexander F Arriaga; Robert T Lancaster; William R Berry; Scott E Regenbogen; Stuart R Lipsitz; Haytham M A Kaafarani; Andrew W Elbardissi; Priya Desai; Stephen J Ferzoco; Ronald Bleday; Elizabeth Breen; William V Kastrinakis; Marc S Rubin; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 12.969

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Estimating the Relative Excess Risk Due to Interaction in Clustered-Data Settings.

Authors:  Katharine Correia; Paige L Williams
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.