Literature DB >> 25387891

Real-time optical diagnosis for diminutive colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging: the VALID randomised clinical trial.

Tonya Kaltenbach1, Amit Rastogi2, Robert V Rouse3, Kenneth R McQuaid4, Tohru Sato1, Ajay Bansal2, Jon C Kosek3, Roy Soetikno1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diminutive (≤ 5 mm) colorectal polyps are common, and overwhelmingly benign. Routinely, after polypectomy, they are examined pathologically to determine the surveillance intervals. Advances in equipment and techniques, such as narrow-band imaging (NBI) colonoscopy, now permit reliable real-time optical diagnosis.
METHODS: We conducted a randomised single-masked study involving three institutions to determine whether optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps meets clinical practice standards and reduces the need for histopathology. We randomly assigned eligible patients undergoing routine high-definition colonoscopy to optical diagnosis using near focus versus standard view, using computer-generated block sequence. By validated criteria, we rendered an optical diagnosis and a confidence level (high vs low) for all polyps, using NBI. Our primary endpoint was the number of accurate high-confidence optical diagnoses compared with central blinded pathology in the two groups. We analysed data using intention to treat.
FINDINGS: We enrolled 558 subjects, and randomly assigned 281 to near focus and 277 to standard view optical diagnosis. We detected 1309 predominantly diminutive (74.5%) and neoplastic (60.0%) polyps. Endoscopists were significantly more likely, OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.6 to 3.0, p<0.0001), to make a high-confidence optical diagnosis with near focus (85.1%) than standard (72.6%) view. High-confidence diagnoses had 96.4% and 92.0% negative predictive value, respectively. Of all polyps, 75.3% (95% CI71.3% to 78.9%) had a high-confidence accurate prediction using near focus, compared with 63.1% (95% CI 58.5% to 67.6%) using standard view. Optical versus histopathological diagnosis showed excellent agreement between the surveillance intervals, 93.5% in near focus and 92.2% in standard view. The median diagnosis time was 14 s.
CONCLUSIONS: Real-time optical diagnosis using NBI colonoscopy may replace the pathology diagnosis for the majority of diminutive colorectal polyps. Using colonoscopy with near focus view increases the confidence level of the optical diagnosis. Optical diagnosis would be a paradigm shift in clinical practice of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01288833. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING; COLORECTAL NEOPLASIA; COLORECTAL PATHOLOGY; IMAGING

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25387891     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  16 in total

Review 1.  Light and sound - emerging imaging techniques for inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Ferdinand Knieling; Maximilian J Waldner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  The Role of Chromoendoscopy in Evaluating Colorectal Dysplasia.

Authors:  Anna M Buchner
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-06

3.  Self-Formation Assessed by Cumulative Summation Test Does Not Reach Recommended Thresholds for Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps ≤ 7 mm.

Authors:  Francisco Javier García-Alonso; Isabel Manzano Santamaría; Antonio Guardiola Arévalo; Rubén Pique Becerra; Amanda Leandro Barros; Noelia de Sande Rivera; Guillermo Moreno Casas; Silvia Arribas Terradillos; Álvaro Llerena Riofrío; Cristian Aitor Escolano Peco; Emma Alguacil Rodríguez; Fernando Bermejo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Optical diagnosis by near-focus versus normal-focus narrow band imaging colonoscopy in colorectal polyps based on combined NICE and WASP classification: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nisa Netinatsunton; Natcha Cheewasereechon; Tanawat Pattarapuntakul; Jaksin Sottisuporn; Kanet Kanjanapradit; Bancha Ovartlarnporn
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-09-08

Review 5.  Advances in endoscopy for colorectal polyp detection and classification.

Authors:  Vijeta Pamudurthy; Nayna Lodhia; Vani J A Konda
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-12-18

6.  Real-Time Characterization of Diminutive Colorectal Polyp Histology Using Narrow-Band Imaging: Implications for the Resect and Discard Strategy.

Authors:  Swati G Patel; Philip Schoenfeld; Hyungjin Myra Kim; Emily K Ward; Ajay Bansal; Yeonil Kim; Lindsay Hosford; Aimee Myers; Stephanie Foster; Jenna Craft; Samuel Shopinski; Robert H Wilson; Dennis J Ahnen; Amit Rastogi; Sachin Wani
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Polyp Resection - Controversial Practices and Unanswered Questions.

Authors:  Daniel von Renteln; Heiko Pohl
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.488

8.  Comparison of the diagnostic ability of blue laser imaging magnification versus pit pattern analysis for colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Arihiro Nakano; Yoshiki Hirooka; Takeshi Yamamura; Osamu Watanabe; Masanao Nakamura; Kohei Funasaka; Eizaburo Ohno; Hiroki Kawashima; Ryoji Miyahara; Hidemi Goto
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-04

Review 9.  Optical Diagnosis for Colorectal Polyps: A Useful Technique Now or in the Future?

Authors:  Ignasi Puig; Tonya Kaltenbach
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 4.519

10.  Leaving colorectal polyps in place can be achieved with high accuracy using blue light imaging (BLI).

Authors:  Helmut Neumann; Helmut Neumann Sen; Michael Vieth; Raf Bisschops; Florian Thieringer; Khan F Rahman; Thomas Gamstätter; Gian Eugenio Tontini; Peter R Galle
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.