BACKGROUND: Various studies have shown that phototherapy promotes the healing of cutaneous wounds. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of phototherapy on healing of cutaneous wounds in nourished and undernourished rats. METHODS: Forty rats, 20 nourished plus 20 others rendered marasmus with undernourishment, were assigned to four equal groups: nourished sham, nourished Light Emitting Diode treated, undernourished sham and undernourished Light Emitting Diode treated. In the two treated groups, two 8-mm punch wounds made on the dorsum of each rat were irradiated three times per week with 3 J/cm2 sq cm of combined 660 and 890 nm light; wounds in the other groups were not irradiated. Wounds were evaluated with digital photography and image analysis, either on day 7 or day 14, with biopsies obtained on day 14 for histological studies. RESULTS: Undernourishment retarded the mean healing rate of the undernourished sham wounds (p < 0.01), but not the undernourished Light emission diode treated wounds, which healed significantly faster (p < 0.001) and as fast as the two nourished groups. Histological analysis showed a smaller percentage of collagen in the undernourished sham group compared with the three other groups, thus confirming our photographic image analysis data. CONCLUSION: Phototherapy reverses the adverse healing effects of undernourishment. Similar beneficial effects may be achieved in patients with poor nutritional status.
BACKGROUND: Various studies have shown that phototherapy promotes the healing of cutaneous wounds. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of phototherapy on healing of cutaneous wounds in nourished and undernourished rats. METHODS: Forty rats, 20 nourished plus 20 others rendered marasmus with undernourishment, were assigned to four equal groups: nourished sham, nourished Light Emitting Diode treated, undernourished sham and undernourished Light Emitting Diode treated. In the two treated groups, two 8-mm punch wounds made on the dorsum of each rat were irradiated three times per week with 3 J/cm2 sq cm of combined 660 and 890 nm light; wounds in the other groups were not irradiated. Wounds were evaluated with digital photography and image analysis, either on day 7 or day 14, with biopsies obtained on day 14 for histological studies. RESULTS: Undernourishment retarded the mean healing rate of the undernourished sham wounds (p < 0.01), but not the undernourished Light emission diode treated wounds, which healed significantly faster (p < 0.001) and as fast as the two nourished groups. Histological analysis showed a smaller percentage of collagen in the undernourished sham group compared with the three other groups, thus confirming our photographic image analysis data. CONCLUSION: Phototherapy reverses the adverse healing effects of undernourishment. Similar beneficial effects may be achieved in patients with poor nutritional status.
Wound healing is an intense dynamic process that increases the metabolic demand for
nutrients as restoration of the structural and functional integrity of damaged tissues
progresses.[1-4] Local factors, such as infections, mechanical force,
presence of 'foreign bodies' (e.g., steel or glass fragments) and the characteristics of
the wound (size, location and type) can interfere with tissue repair. Although measures
can be taken to overcome such challenges, systemic factors such as diabetes mellitus,
circulatory deficiencies, hormonal imbalance and nutritional deficits, including
protein-energy malnutrition (PEM), present greater problems.[1-5]PEM results from inadequate food intake and is characterized by energy deficiency,
resulting from decreased intake of macro- and micronutrients. Three types of PEM are
well-recognized; marasmus, kwashiorkor and marasmus-kwashiorkor. Marasmus is prevalent
in most developing countries, and it is said to occur when energy intake is insufficient
to meet the organic demand of the body, causing the body to use its own energy sources
such as glycogen, skeletal muscle and finally triglycerides, to fulfill its energy
requirements.[6-8] This results in significant weight loss-typically loss of
muscle and adipose masses, growth retardation, muscle atrophy and "alert" mental status.
Serum albumin levels are known to diminish but may not change significantly.[3,6]Kwashiorkor is attributable more to protein insufficiency than energy deficiency, and is
associated with inadequate protein synthesis and edema. Kwashiorkor can also occur due
to increased nutrient demand in patients with catabolic episodes, such as sepsis and
burns. Anemia, hepatomegaly, lethargy, low levels of visceral proteins, severe
immunological disorders and early death have been reported in individuals with
kwashiorkor.[6-8] Symptoms of marasmus and kwashiorkor appear in persons
with marasmuskwashiorkor, and each condition-marasmus, kwashiorkor or
marasmus-kwashiorkor- can significantly impair wound healing.In recent years, phototherapy with red or infrared (600 - 1000nm) non-coherent light
emitting diodes (LEDs) has been described as a valuable tool for promoting tissue
repair.[9-11] There is evidence that coherent light (laser) and
non-coherent (LED) light produce similar healing effects on tissues, reinforcing the
notion that the physiological and therapeutic effects of phototherapy depend on the
absorption of photons by chromophores in the target tissue. Studies have shown that the
absorbed energy (photon) is transformed into ATP and used by the cell to power needed
metabolic activities, such as cell proliferation, collagen synthesis, and overall
acceleration of tissue repair in experimental animal studies and humans with chronic
wounds.[11-23] Due to these emerging reports, we hypothesized that
wounds, which in the presence of undernourishment are well-known to heal slowly or not
at all, may benefit from treatment with the right dose and wavelength of light. To test
this hypothesis, we determined the effect of a combination of 660nm and 890nm LED
phototherapy on wound healing in undernourished rats with clinical evidence of marasmus.
Our choice of combined 660nm and 890nm phototherapy was influenced by a previous study
in which we showed that these light wavelengths significantly improved healing in
patients with chronic venous ulcers.[23]
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Experimental Induction of Marasmus
Following approval by the Ethics Committee in Animal Research (CETEA), Ribeirão Preto
School of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP) (Protocol Number 274/2005), 40
adult male Wistar rats (Rattus norvegicus) weighing 180-200g were
obtained from the central animal facility of FMRP-USP. To estimate the mean food
intake of each rat, the animals were fed ad libitum during the first
three days. Thereafter, 20 rats were randomly assigned to the ad
libitum (nourished group); the remaining 20, assigned to the
undernourished group, received half of the average daily food intake determined
during the initial three days. Animals received water ad libitum and
were kept in individual cages in a room maintained at a temperature of 22ºC with 12h
light/12h darkness cycles. After three days, rats were weighed and serum albumin
measured in order to assess the nutritional status of each animal. The analysis was
again carried out on the 60th day of follow-up.
Surgical Procedures and Assignment of Animals to Experimental Groups
After 60 days of monitoring the nutritional status of the rats, they were
anesthetized with intraperitoneal injections of 1.0ml/100g body weight of 4.0%
chloral hydrate. Subsequently, two 8-mm punch wounds were made on the dorsum of each
rat before the animals were assigned to four equal groups; nourished sham (NS),
nourished LED treated (NL), undernourished sham (US) and undernourished LED treated
(UL). In the sham groups, the animals underwent the surgical procedure and were
treated with LED off. Each procedure was performed in accordance with the ethical
principles adopted by the Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation (COBEA).
LED Phototherapy
A Dynatron Solaris 705® device fitted with combined 660nm and 890nm
Cluster Probe (Dynatronics Corporation, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) was used to treat
the NL and UL wounds, as detailed in our previous study [23]. The device emits 500-mW
light from 36 diodes interspersed in a 5-cm2 cluster-32 infrared 890-nm
diodes, each emitting 15-mW; and four 5-mW red 660-nm diodes. To avoid cross
contamination, each wound was covered with a transparent 100% transmissive clear
plastic before the probe was placed directly on the wound, as detailed in our
previous report.[23] Wounds were then
treated for 30s each, yielding a dose of 3J cm-2 fluence. Treatment was
applied three times per week over a maximum period of 14 days.
Wound Healing Assessment
Photographs of each wound were taken with a Sony-DSC P41 digital camera (Sony
Corporation, Tokyo - Japan) on days zero, 7 and 14. Image capture was standardized
using a 30-cm-high aluminum support, to which the camera was fixed perpendicularly to
the wound. The digital images obtained were analyzed with ImageJ® software
(U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), as previously described.
Subsequently, wound areas, which were clearly delineated by the software, were
automatically computed.[23-26] Thereafter, ulcer healing rates (UHR)
(that is to say: initial area [Ai]minus the final area [Af]divided by the initial
area [(Ai-Af)/Ai]), were calculated.[23,26]
Histological analysis
On the 14th day post-surgery, animals were euthanized in a CO2
chamber; then wound areas were biopsied with 8-mm punches and immediately fixed in 4%
formalin. Slides were stained with Gomory's trichrome for collagen analysis. Ten
images from each slide-each with 500x100 pixels-were selected and then observed under
a Leica DM 4000B microscope (Leica Microsystems, Cambridge, Essex, UK) at a
magnification of 100x. A plug-in color analyzer from ImageJ® software was
used to delineate and quantify the blue areas representing collagen. The percentage
of collagen in each area was thus computed.
Statistical Analysis
Rat body weights and serum albumin levels were compared using the t-Student test and
Mann Whitney test for comparison between two samples. Group differences in UHR and
collagen were determined with ANOVA; then, Bonferroni post-hoc tests were used to
pinpoint groups that differed. The data were analysed using the GraphPad Prism 5
software (San Diego, CA, USA). The level of statistical difference was set at
p<0.05.
RESULTS
Marasmus
As shown in graph 1A, undernourished rats
weighed significantly less than nourished rats at 60 days following diet modification
(p < 0.001). Similarly, serum albumin levels were lower in the undernourished
group; however, the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05); graph 1B. Undernourished rats had all the clinical
signs of marasmus; notably, decreased growth, muscle atrophy, fragile nails, hair
loss, permanent "alert" state, intense agitation and starvation.
GRAPH 1
The relative weights (A) and serum albumin levels (B)
of nourished and undernourished rats after 60 days of diet modification and
observation before wounds were induced in the rats
The relative weights (A) and serum albumin levels (B)
of nourished and undernourished rats after 60 days of diet modification and
observation before wounds were induced in the rats
Ulcer Healing Rate
Day seven data showed that undernourished sham (US) wounds healed significantly
slower than any of the other wounds, and was statistically different from the NS
group (p<0.01), NL group (p<0.05) and the UL group (p<0.001), as displayed
in graph 2A. Treatment with LED phototherapy
reversed this trend, such that UL wounds healed significantly faster than the US
wounds (p<0.001) and attained the same healing rate as treated or untreated
nourished wounds (Graph 2A). Thus, phototherapy
fully reversed the adverse healing effect of marasmus, restoring normal healing in
the UL group. There was no statistically significant difference in the healing rates
of nourished and undernourished wounds treated with phototherapy; neither were there
differences in UHR between the UL and NL groups.
GRAPH 2
Mean ulcers healing rate (UHR) evaluated on the 7th postoperative day
(A) and the 14th postoperative day (B)
Mean ulcers healing rate (UHR) evaluated on the 7th postoperative day
(A) and the 14th postoperative day (B)Postoperative day 14 data revealed a similar trend. As shown in graph 2b and figure 1, US
wounds continued to heal slower than those of any other group, and were statistically
significantly different from the UL and NL groups (p<0.01), as well as the NS
group (p< 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in UHR
between the UL group and the two nourished groups, NS and NL (p >0.05); again
indicating that phototherapy reversed the adverse healing effects of marasmus (Graph 2B and Figure
1). As with the 7-day data, there was no difference between the healing
rates of the NS and NL wounds (Graph 2B).
FIGURE 1
Representative photographs showing the four groups (NS, NL, US and UL) of
wounds on day 0, and the 7th and 14th postoperative
days
Representative photographs showing the four groups (NS, NL, US and UL) of
wounds on day 0, and the 7th and 14th postoperative
days
Histological Evaluation of Healing
As shown in graph 3 and figure 2, the US wounds also had a smaller percentage of collagen
than those of any other group (p <0.01). Qualitative histological analysis showed
that the healed tissue had a lighter blue color-different from the normal collagen
color seen in the other groups. The US group also had smaller, less dense collagen
formation compared with the other groups (Figure
2). In contrast, the collagen of undernourished wounds, treated with LED
phototherapy, was visibly superior compared with the US group and similar in
appearance to the specimens from the two nourished groups (Figure 2).
GRAPH 3
Percentage of collagen area quantified in each group of wounds on the
14th postoperative day
FIGURE 2
Representative light micrographs showing the collagen in the wounds of the
groups NS, NL, US and UL on day 14 (Gomory trichrome stain). The asterisk (*)
indicates normal collagen
Percentage of collagen area quantified in each group of wounds on the
14th postoperative dayRepresentative light micrographs showing the collagen in the wounds of the
groups NS, NL, US and UL on day 14 (Gomory trichrome stain). The asterisk (*)
indicates normal collagen
DISCUSSION
Adequate levels of nutrients such as proteins, carbohydrates, vitamins and minerals are
essential to maintain the normal structure and function of the skin. When malnutrition
occurs, healing can be impaired since the normal process of cutaneous tissue repair
depends heavily on excellent nutritional status of patients.[2,3,5,26,27] We induced marasmus in rats, created wounds and treated
them with LED phototherapy in order to mimic the type of non-responsive wounds presented
clinically by undernourished patients. Consistent with previous reports, our success in
inducing marasmus in the animals was confirmed by significant weight loss, decreased
growth, muscular atrophy, fragile nails, hair loss, permanent "alert" state, intense
agitation and starvation.[3,6-8]
Mean serum albumin declined in the undernourished group but was not statistically
different from the mean level measured in the nourished group. This finding is
consistent with previous reports, which indicate that serum albumin has a tendency to
decrease slowly in cases of marasmus.[3,6] The UHR results obtained on days 7 and 14
showed that undernourishment significantly impaired cutaneous wound healing. These
findings were corroborated by our histological findings, which showed that the sham
undernourished (US) rats had the smallest percentage of collagen (Graph 3). Previous studies have shown that malnutrition impairs
wound healing and delays the process of collagen synthesis.[2,3,5,26,27]Phototherapy did not promote healing or alter the collagen of nourished rats. In
contrast, it significantly accelerated wound healing in undernourished rats; reversing
the adverse effect of marasmus such that the UL rats healed at the same rate as the two
well-nourished groups. This finding suggests that healing advanced optimally with full
nourishment but not in the presence of marasmus. It is possible that marasmus engenders
the type of physiological condition that heightened the sensitivity of cells to light
absorption and utilization. In an in vitro study, Almeida-Lopes et
al.[28] exposed two sets of
gingival fibroblasts to 670nm, 780nm, 692nm and 786nm wavelengths of light. One set of
cells were grown in an ideal culture medium with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS); the other
in a nutrient deficient medium (5% FBS). Without phototherapy, the latter cells
proliferated at a significantly lower rate than the cells grown in the ideal culture
condition. Conversely, with phototherapy, they proliferated at similar or higher rates
than those grown with the ideal medium.[28]Similarly, Pinheiro et al. irradiated cutaneous wounds in nourished and undernourished
rats with light from a 635nm laser or a polarized polychromatic 400 - 200nm light
source, using either 20J/cm2 or 40J/cm2 fluence.[29] With polychromatic light treatment, the
best healing was observed in nourished and undernourished rats treated with a
20J/cm2 dose. With laser treatment, the best healing obtained was in the
undernourished group treated with the 20J/cm2 fluence.[29] These results, in addition to those of
Almeida-Lopes, are consistent with our findings, which show that healing
retardation-occasioned by undernourishment-can be reversed with treatment, using 3.0 J/
cm2 fluence of combined 660nm and 890nm light.[28] This finding suggests that a similar beneficial effect
may be achieved in undernourished patients (e.g., those with vitamin or micronutrient
deficiencies, chronic degenerative diseases such as AIDS, cancer, or metabolic
pathologies), whose wounds are known to respond poorly to other forms of
treatment.[25,27,30]Although the mechanisms by which phototherapy promotes tissue repair is not fully
understood, several studies have suggested that treatment with light, particularly red
and infrared light in the range of 600 to 1000nm, accelerates local blood flow, speeds
inflammation, promotes cell proliferation (including the proliferation of epithelial and
endothelial cells, keratinocytes, macrophages, lymphocytes, and fibroblasts), increases
collagen synthesis and overall, accelerates tissue repair in a variety of experimental
models.[16-20,31-37] Reports indicate that these beneficial
effects are achieved because such wavelengths of light are readily absorbed by
cytrochrome c oxidase-a chromophore within the inner membrane of mitochondria.[12,13,15] In turn, the light
energy absorbed is transformed into adenosine triphosphate (ATP): the form of energy
that cells use to power needed metabolic processes, such as cell proliferation and
tissue repair.[11,14-16,19,20] Susceptibility to photostimulation seems dependent on the
physiological status of the irradiated cells, given that in certain conditions, some
cells have been shown to exhibit decreased redox potential and increased sensitivity to
irradiation with light.[11,13,38-41] Further studies are
needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which light promotes tissue repair in the presence
of marasmus.
CONCLUSION
Our results show that phototherapy, using a combination of 660nm and 890nm LEDs,
significantly promotes healing of skin wounds in undernourished rats, suggesting that
similar beneficial effects may be achieved in patients with poor nutritional status,
such as those with chronic degenerative diseases such as AIDS, cancer or critically illpatients admitted to intensive care.
Authors: Paulo Cesar Lock Silveira; Luciano A Silva; Tiago P Freitas; Alexandra Latini; Ricardo A Pinho Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2010-09-24 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Alexandre Greca Diamantino; Renata Amadei Nicolau; Davidson Ribeiro Costa; Alessandra Paes de Barros Almeida; Danila Xênia de Miranda Mato; Marco Antonio de Oliveira; Ana Maria do Espírito Santo Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Daniela S Masson-Meyers; Thiago A M Andrade; Guilherme F Caetano; Francielle R Guimaraes; Marcel N Leite; Saulo N Leite; Marco Andrey C Frade Journal: Int J Exp Pathol Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Thamyres Maria Silva Simões; José de Alencar Fernandes Neto; Cassiano Francisco Weege Nonaka; Maria Helena Chaves de Vasconcelos Catão Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2022-03-02 Impact factor: 2.555
Authors: Mohammed A Hadis; Siti A Zainal; Michelle J Holder; James D Carroll; Paul R Cooper; Michael R Milward; William M Palin Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2016-03-10 Impact factor: 3.161