OBJECTIVE: To quantify racial differences in brain structural characteristics in white and black octogenarians, and to examine whether these characteristics contribute to cognition. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 283 adults 79-89 years old (59.4% white;42.0% women) with data on gray matter integrity via diffusion tensor imaging (mean diffusivity), gray matter atrophy (GMA), white matter hyperintensities (WMH), literacy, smoking, drinking, income, hypertension and diabetes. Participants were recruited from an ongoing epidemiological study of older adults living in the community with a range of chronic conditions, physical and cognitive function. Standardized betas (sβ) of neuroimaging markers predicting Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) scores were computed in multivariable regression models stratified by race. RESULTS: Compared to whites, blacks had lower DSST (p=0.001) and lower 3MS (p=0.006), but also lower mean diffusivity (i.e. higher gray matter microstructural integrity, p=0.032), independent of gender, income, literacy, body mass index, diabetes and drinking habits. Racial differences were not significant for WMH (p=0.062) or GMA (p=0.4). Among blacks, mean diffusivity and WMH were associated with DSST (sβ=-.209, p=0.037 and -.211, p=.038, respectively) independent of each other and other covariates; among whites, mean diffusivity, but not WMH, was significantly associated with DSST and 3MS (sβ =-.277, p=.002 and -.250, p=0.029, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of octogenarians living in the community, blacks appeared to have higher microstructural integrity of gray matter as compared to whites. This neuroimaging marker was related to higher cognition even in the presence of WMH and other cardiovascular conditions. If confirmed, these findings suggest microstructural gray matter integrity may be a target to improve cognition, especially among blacks who survive to very old age with a range of chronic cardiovascular conditions.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify racial differences in brain structural characteristics in white and black octogenarians, and to examine whether these characteristics contribute to cognition. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 283 adults 79-89 years old (59.4% white;42.0% women) with data on gray matter integrity via diffusion tensor imaging (mean diffusivity), gray matter atrophy (GMA), white matter hyperintensities (WMH), literacy, smoking, drinking, income, hypertension and diabetes. Participants were recruited from an ongoing epidemiological study of older adults living in the community with a range of chronic conditions, physical and cognitive function. Standardized betas (sβ) of neuroimaging markers predicting Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) scores were computed in multivariable regression models stratified by race. RESULTS: Compared to whites, blacks had lower DSST (p=0.001) and lower 3MS (p=0.006), but also lower mean diffusivity (i.e. higher gray matter microstructural integrity, p=0.032), independent of gender, income, literacy, body mass index, diabetes and drinking habits. Racial differences were not significant for WMH (p=0.062) or GMA (p=0.4). Among blacks, mean diffusivity and WMH were associated with DSST (sβ=-.209, p=0.037 and -.211, p=.038, respectively) independent of each other and other covariates; among whites, mean diffusivity, but not WMH, was significantly associated with DSST and 3MS (sβ =-.277, p=.002 and -.250, p=0.029, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of octogenarians living in the community, blacks appeared to have higher microstructural integrity of gray matter as compared to whites. This neuroimaging marker was related to higher cognition even in the presence of WMH and other cardiovascular conditions. If confirmed, these findings suggest microstructural gray matter integrity may be a target to improve cognition, especially among blacks who survive to very old age with a range of chronic cardiovascular conditions.
Authors: A F Kramer; S Hahn; N J Cohen; M T Banich; E McAuley; C R Harrison; J Chason; E Vakil; L Bardell; R A Boileau; A Colcombe Journal: Nature Date: 1999-07-29 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Caterina Rosano; Yue-Fang Chang; Lewis H Kuller; Jack M Guralnik; Stephanie A Studenski; Howard J Aizenstein; Peter J Gianaros; Oscar L Lopez; William T Longstreth; Anne B Newman Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2013-07-25 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: R N Bryan; S W Wells; T J Miller; A D Elster; C A Jungreis; V C Poirier; B K Lind; T A Manolio Journal: Radiology Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Kristine Yaffe; Cherie M Falvey; Nathan Hamilton; Tamara B Harris; Eleanor M Simonsick; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Ronald I Shorr; Andrea Metti; Ann V Schwartz Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Dana R Jorgensen; C Elizabeth Shaaban; Clayton A Wiley; Peter J Gianaros; Joseph Mettenburg; Caterina Rosano Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2018-02-02 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Debra A Fleischman; Konstantinos Arfanakis; Sue E Leurgans; Shengwei Zhang; Victoria N Poole; S Duke Han; Lei Yu; Melissa Lamar; Namhee Kim; David A Bennett; Lisa L Barnes Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2021-11-20 Impact factor: 5.133
Authors: Elizabeth A Boots; Liang Zhan; Karla J Castellanos; Lisa L Barnes; Lisa Tussing-Humphreys; Melissa Lamar Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 3.978