Literature DB >> 25387255

The College of American Pathologists guidelines for whole slide imaging validation are feasible for pediatric pathology: a pediatric pathology practice experience.

Michael A Arnold1, Emily Chenever, Peter B Baker, Daniel R Boué, Bonita Fung, Sue Hammond, Brett W Hendrickson, Samir B Kahwash, Christopher R Pierson, Vinay Prasad, Kathleen K Nicol, Thomas Barr.   

Abstract

Whole slide imaging (WSI) is rapidly transforming educational and diagnostic pathology services. Recently, the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center (CAP-PLQC) published recommended guidelines for validating diagnostic WSI. We prospectively evaluated the guidelines to determine their utility in validating pediatric surgical pathology and cytopathology specimens. Our validation included varied pediatric specimen types, including complex or less common diagnoses, in accordance with the guidelines. We completed WSI review of 60 surgical pathology cases and attempted WSI review of 21 cytopathology cases. For surgical pathology cases, WSI diagnoses were highly concordant with glass slide diagnoses; a discordant diagnosis was observed in 1 of 60 cases (98.3% concordance). We found that nucleated red blood cells and eosinophilic granular bodies represented specific challenges to WSI review of pediatric specimens. Cytology specimens were more frequently discordant or failed for technical reasons, with overall concordance of 66.7%. Review of pediatric cytopathology specimens will likely require image capture in multiple focal planes. This study is the first to specifically evaluate WSI review for pediatric specimens and demonstrates that specimens representing the spectrum of pediatric surgical pathology practice can be reviewed using WSI. Our application of the proposed CAP-PLQC guidelines to pediatric surgical pathology specimens is, to our knowledge, the first prospective implementation of the CAP-PLQC guidelines.

Keywords:  College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center; cytopathology; pediatric; surgical pathology; virtual microscopy; whole slide imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25387255     DOI: 10.2350/14-07-1523-OA.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dev Pathol        ISSN: 1093-5266


  9 in total

1.  The performance of digital microscopy for primary diagnosis in human pathology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anna Luíza Damaceno Araújo; Lady Paola Aristizábal Arboleda; Natalia Rangel Palmier; Jéssica Montenegro Fonsêca; Mariana de Pauli Paglioni; Wagner Gomes-Silva; Ana Carolina Prado Ribeiro; Thaís Bianca Brandão; Luciana Estevam Simonato; Paul M Speight; Felipe Paiva Fonseca; Marcio Ajudarte Lopes; Oslei Paes de Almeida; Pablo Agustin Vargas; Cristhian Camilo Madrid Troconis; Alan Roger Santos-Silva
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2019-01-26       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Integrating digital pathology into clinical practice.

Authors:  Matthew G Hanna; Orly Ardon; Victor E Reuter; Sahussapont Joseph Sirintrapun; Christine England; David S Klimstra; Meera R Hameed
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Conventional Microscopical versus Digital Whole-Slide Imaging-Based Diagnosis of Thin-Layer Cervical Specimens: A Validation Study.

Authors:  Odille Bongaerts; Carla Clevers; Marij Debets; Daniëlle Paffen; Lisanne Senden; Kim Rijks; Linda Ruiten; Daisy Sie-Go; Paul J van Diest; Marius Nap
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2018-08-27

4.  Whole slide imaging compared with light microscopy for primary diagnosis in surgical neuropathology: a validation study.

Authors:  Ali Alassiri; Amna Almutrafi; Fahd Alsufiani; Atheer Al Nehkilan; Alaa Al Salim; Hesham Musleh; Mohammad Aziz; Walid Khalbuss
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 1.526

5.  Testing of Actual Scanner Performance in a High-loaded UNIM Laboratory Environment.

Authors:  Mikhail Yurevich Genis; Alexey Igorevich Remez; Maxim Ivanovich Untesco; Dmitrii Anatolevich Zhakota
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2021-11-01

6.  Whole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology: A Multicenter Blinded Randomized Noninferiority Study of 1992 Cases (Pivotal Study).

Authors:  Sanjay Mukhopadhyay; Michael D Feldman; Esther Abels; Raheela Ashfaq; Senda Beltaifa; Nicolas G Cacciabeve; Helen P Cathro; Liang Cheng; Kumarasen Cooper; Glenn E Dickey; Ryan M Gill; Robert P Heaton; René Kerstens; Guy M Lindberg; Reenu K Malhotra; James W Mandell; Ellen D Manlucu; Anne M Mills; Stacey E Mills; Christopher A Moskaluk; Mischa Nelis; Deepa T Patil; Christopher G Przybycin; Jordan P Reynolds; Brian P Rubin; Mohammad H Saboorian; Mauricio Salicru; Mark A Samols; Charles D Sturgis; Kevin O Turner; Mark R Wick; Ji Y Yoon; Po Zhao; Clive R Taylor
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Making Pathology Diagnoses with Glass or Digital Slides: Which Modality is Inferior?

Authors:  Jonhan Ho; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2017-04-10

8.  Pitfalls in the use of whole slide imaging for the diagnosis of central nervous system tumors: A pilot study in surgical neuropathology.

Authors:  Melike Pekmezci; Sanem Pinar Uysal; Yelda Orhan; Tarik Tihan; Han Sung Lee
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2016-05-04

9.  Diagnostic concordance and discordance in digital pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ayesha S Azam; Islam M Miligy; Peter K-U Kimani; Heeba Maqbool; Katherine Hewitt; Nasir M Rajpoot; David R J Snead
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.