Literature DB >> 25387085

Determinants of nephrostomy tube dislodgment after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

David Bayne1, Eric R Taylor, Lindsay Hampson, Thomas Chi, Marshall L Stoller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) traditionally necessitates the placement of a nephrostomy tube at the conclusion of the surgical procedure. Although tubeless PCNL has become more popular, patients with complex problems still need traditional nephrostomy tube drainage. The goal of this study was to investigate whether patient body mass index (BMI) impacted inadvertent nephrostomy tube dislodgement. Furthermore, we hoped to determine whether nephrostomy tube type impacted tube dislodgement rates.
METHODS: A retrospective review between 2005 and 2012 of 475 consecutive PCNL cases was undertaken. Patients were categorized based on the type of nephrostomy tube placed. BMI was examined as a continuous variable. The primary outcome of nephrostomy tube dislodgment was determined based on imaging obtained at the time of PCNL and postoperative hospitalization. Logistic regression analysis was then used to adjust for nephrostomy tube type and BMI.
RESULTS: Overall, 24 (5.5%) total patients experienced nephrostomy tube dislodgment postoperatively. The mean BMI for patients experiencing nephrostomy tube dislodgment was 39.7 vs 30.9 for those without tube dislodgment (P<0.0001; 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.6 to 12.9). Using logistic regression and adjusting for the use tube type, BMI was an independent predictor of tube dislodgement (P<0.001). For each unit of increase in BMI, the likelihood of tube dislodgment increased by 6% (1.06). After adjusting for BMI, however, nephrostomy tube type was not found to be an independent predictor of nephrostomy tube dislodgment.
CONCLUSIONS: Nephrostomy tube type did not influence nephrostomy tube dislodgment rates. As a patient's BMI increased, the likelihood of tube dislodgment increased in a directly proportionate fashion. This is possibly because of the nephrostomy tube being fixed directly to the mobile skin associated with their fat pannus. Although the nephrostomy tube type itself did not affect tube dislodgment rates, a redesigned nephrostomy tube or fixation device should take into account the above findings related to obese patients to reduce the likelihood of nephrostomy tube dislodgment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25387085      PMCID: PMC4516952          DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  14 in total

1.  The changing practice of percutaneous stone surgery. Review of 1000 cases 1981-1988.

Authors:  D J Jones; G L Russell; M J Kellett; J E Wickham
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1990-07

Review 2.  Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults--The Evidence Report. National Institutes of Health.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  1998-09

3.  Comparison of nephrostomy drainage types following percutaneous nephrolithotomy requiring multiple tracts: single tube versus multiple tubes versus tubeless.

Authors:  Berkan Resorlu; Cengiz Kara; Erhan Sahin; Ali Unsal
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  Prevention of cardiovascular disease: updating the immensity of the challenge and the role of risk factors.

Authors:  Richard Kones; Umme Rumana
Journal:  Hosp Pract (1995)       Date:  2014-02

5.  Reinforcement for percutaneous nephrostomy tubes with a new technique.

Authors:  Tie Zhou; Xiaofeng Gao; Cheng Yang; Yonghan Peng; Liang Xiao; Chuanliang Xu; Linhui Wang; Jianguo Hou; Yinghao Sun
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 6.  Nephrostomy tube-free versus nephrostomy tube for renal drainage after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pengfei Shen; Yong Liu; Jia Wang
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.089

7.  Questioning the wisdom of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a prospective randomized controlled study of early tube removal vs tubeless PCNL.

Authors:  Shashikant Mishra; Ravindra B Sabnis; Abraham Kurien; Arvind Ganpule; Veeramani Muthu; Mahesh Desai
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Urologist directed percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement.

Authors:  K G Mahaffey; D M Bolton; M L Stoller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Simple reinforcement for thin nephrostomy catheters.

Authors:  N Ostendorf; H van Ahlen; L Hertle
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  The evolving epidemiology of stone disease.

Authors:  Ksenia Roudakova; Manoj Monga
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2014-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  An unusual cause of Grade IIIb Clavien complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Broken and retained Malecot nephrostomy catheter.

Authors:  Bora Ozveren; Ahmet Sahin
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The Circle Nephrostomy Tube: An Attractive Nephrostomy Drainage System Following Complex Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Marawan M El Tayeb; Michael S Borofsky; James E Lingeman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Superobese: A Comparison of Outcomes Based on Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Casey A Dauw; Michael S Borofsky; Nadya York; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 4.  Where do urologists stand in the era of novel coronavirus-2019 disease.

Authors:  Thomas Hughes; Hui Ching Ho; Shahrokh F Shariat; Bhaskar Kumar Somani
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.309

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.