Literature DB >> 25387084

Characterization of thin poly(dimethylsiloxane)-based tissue-simulating phantoms with tunable reduced scattering and absorption coefficients at visible and near-infrared wavelengths.

Gage J Greening1, Raeef Istfan2, Laura M Higgins3, Kartik Balachandran1, Darren Roblyer2, Mark C Pierce3, Timothy J Muldoon1.   

Abstract

Optical phantoms are used in the development of various imaging systems. For certain applications, the development of thin phantoms that simulate the physical size and optical properties of tissue is important. Here, we demonstrate a method for producing thin phantom layers with tunable optical properties using poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) as a substrate material. The thickness of each layer (between 115 and 880 μm) was controlled using a spin coater. The reduced scattering and absorption coefficients were controlled using titanium dioxide and alcohol-soluble nigrosin, respectively. These optical coefficients were quantified at six discrete wavelengths (591, 631, 659, 691, 731, and 851 nm) at varying concentrations of titanium dioxide and nigrosin using spatial frequency domain imaging. From the presented data, we provide lookup tables to determine the appropriate concentrations of scattering and absorbing agents to be used in the design of PDMS-based phantoms with specific optical coefficients. In addition, heterogeneous phantoms mimicking the layered features of certain tissue types may be fabricated from multiple stacked layers, each with custom optical properties. These thin, tunable PDMS optical phantoms can simulate many tissue types and have broad imaging calibration applications in endoscopy, diffuse optical spectroscopic imaging, and optical coherence tomography, etc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25387084      PMCID: PMC4227531          DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.11.115002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Opt        ISSN: 1083-3668            Impact factor:   3.170


  25 in total

1.  Double-integrating-sphere system for measuring the optical properties of tissue.

Authors:  J W Pickering; S A Prahl; N van Wieringen; J F Beek; H J Sterenborg; M J van Gemert
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 1.980

2.  Determining the optical properties of turbid mediaby using the adding-doubling method.

Authors:  S A Prahl; M J van Gemert; A J Welch
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1993-02-01       Impact factor: 1.980

3.  Tissue phantom for optical diagnostics based on a suspension of microspheres with a fractal size distribution.

Authors:  D Passos; J C Hebden; P N Pinto; R Guerra
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

4.  Retina-simulating phantom for optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Jigesh Baxi; William Calhoun; Yasir Jamal Sepah; Daniel X Hammer; Ilko Ilev; T Joshua Pfefer; Quan Dong Nguyen; Anant Agrawal
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Esophageal epithelium of women with AIDS: thickness and local immunity.

Authors:  Laura Rocha; Renata Silva; Janaínna Olegário; Rosana Corrêa; Vicente Teixeira; Camila Cavellani
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  Fabrication and characterization of a multilayered optical tissue model with embedded scattering microspheres in polymeric materials.

Authors:  Robert C Chang; Peter Johnson; Christopher M Stafford; Jeeseong Hwang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Tissue phantoms in multicenter clinical trials for diffuse optical technologies.

Authors:  Albert E Cerussi; Robert Warren; Brian Hill; Darren Roblyer; Anaїs Leproux; Amanda F Durkin; Thomas D O'Sullivan; Sam Keene; Hosain Haghany; Timothy Quang; William M Mantulin; Bruce J Tromberg
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Introduction: feature issue on phantoms for the performance evaluation and validation of optical medical imaging devices.

Authors:  Jeeseong Hwang; Jessica C Ramella-Roman; Robert Nordstrom
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Scattering phase function spectrum makes reflectance spectrum measured from Intralipid phantoms and tissue sensitive to the device detection geometry.

Authors:  S C Kanick; V Krishnaswamy; U A Gamm; H J C M Sterenborg; D J Robinson; A Amelink; B W Pogue
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Thin PDMS films using long spin times or tert-butyl alcohol as a solvent.

Authors:  John H Koschwanez; Robert H Carlson; Deirdre R Meldrum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  13 in total

1.  Fabrication and Characterization of Optical Tissue Phantoms Containing Macrostructure.

Authors:  Madeleine S Durkee; Landon D Nash; Fatemeh Nooshabadi; Jeffrey D Cirillo; Duncan J Maitland; Kristen C Maitland
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Chromophore decomposition in multispectral time-resolved diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Judy Zouaoui; Laura Di Sieno; Lionel Hervé; Antonio Pifferi; Andrea Farina; Alberto Dalla Mora; Jacques Derouard; Jean-Marc Dinten
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Fiber-bundle microendoscopy with sub-diffuse reflectance spectroscopy and intensity mapping for multimodal optical biopsy of stratified epithelium.

Authors:  Gage J Greening; Haley M James; Amy J Powless; Joshua A Hutcheson; Mary K Dierks; Narasimhan Rajaram; Timothy J Muldoon
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Design and validation of a diffuse reflectance and spectroscopic microendoscope with poly(dimethylsioxane)-based phantoms.

Authors:  Gage J Greening; Amy J Powless; Joshua A Hutcheson; Sandra P Prieto; Aneeka A Majid; Timothy J Muldoon
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2015-03-09

Review 5.  Criteria for the design of tissue-mimicking phantoms for the standardization of biophotonic instrumentation.

Authors:  Lina Hacker; Heidrun Wabnitz; Antonio Pifferi; T Joshua Pfefer; Brian W Pogue; Sarah E Bohndiek
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 25.671

6.  Three-dimensional printed optical phantoms with customized absorption and scattering properties.

Authors:  Phuong Diep; Sanjana Pannem; Jordan Sweer; Justine Lo; Michael Snyder; Gabriella Stueber; Yanyu Zhao; Syeda Tabassum; Raeef Istfan; Junjie Wu; Shyamsunder Erramilli; Darren Roblyer
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Fabrication of 3D Fingerprint Phantoms via Unconventional Polycarbonate Molding.

Authors:  Clayton W Schultz; Jessica X H Wong; Hua-Zhong Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Real-time, wide-field, and quantitative oxygenation imaging using spatiotemporal modulation of light.

Authors:  Manon Schmidt; Enagnon Aguénounon; Amir Nahas; Murielle Torregrossa; Bruce J Tromberg; Wilfried Uhring; Sylvain Gioux
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  Spatial frequency domain imaging in 2019: principles, applications, and perspectives.

Authors:  Sylvain Gioux; Amaan Mazhar; David J Cuccia
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Towards monitoring dysplastic progression in the oral cavity using a hybrid fiber-bundle imaging and spectroscopy probe.

Authors:  Gage J Greening; Haley M James; Mary K Dierks; Nontapoth Vongkittiargorn; Samantha M Osterholm; Narasimhan Rajaram; Timothy J Muldoon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.