| Literature DB >> 25386790 |
Muhammad Tariq Rafiq1, Rukhsanda Aziz2, Xiaoe Yang2, Wendan Xiao2, Peter J Stoffella3, Aamir Saghir4, Muhammad Azam5, Tingqiang Li2.
Abstract
Food chain contamination by soil cadmium (Cd) through vegetable consumption poses a threat to human health. Therefore, an understanding is needed on the relationship between the phytoavailability of Cd in soils and its uptake in edible tissues of vegetables. The purpose of this study was to establish soil Cd thresholds of representative Chinese soils based on dietary toxicity to humans and develop a model to evaluate the phytoavailability of Cd to Pak choi (Brassica chinensis L.) based on soil properties. Mehlich-3 extractable Cd thresholds were more suitable for Stagnic Anthrosols, Calcareous, Ustic Cambosols, Typic Haplustalfs, Udic Ferrisols and Periudic Argosols with values of 0.30, 0.25, 0.18, 0.16, 0.15 and 0.03 mg kg-1, respectively, while total Cd is adequate threshold for Mollisols with a value of 0.86 mg kg-1. A stepwise regression model indicated that Cd phytoavailability to Pak choi was significantly influenced by soil pH, organic matter, total Zinc and Cd concentrations in soil. Therefore, since Cd accumulation in Pak choi varied with soil characteristics, they should be considered while assessing the environmental quality of soils to ensure the hygienically safe food production.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25386790 PMCID: PMC4227677 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Basic Chemical and Physical Characteristics of Seven Chinese soils.
| Soil Types | Mollisols | Ustic Cambosols | Stagnic Anthrosols | Periudic Argosols | Typic Haplustalfs | Udic Ferrisols | Calcaric Regosols |
| pH | 7.23±0.08 | 7.80±0.02 | 6.49±0.03 | 4.85±0.06 | 5.16±0.05 | 4.43±0.07 | 8.02±0.04 |
| OM (g kg−1) | 32.2±0.32 | 7.54±0.20 | 21.4±0.34 | 11.6±0.17 | 6.37±0.56 | 19.1±0.15 | 21.8±0.14 |
| CEC (cmol kg−1) | 34.0±2.51 | 15.8±1.62 | 20.2±1.41 | 12.6±1.52 | 8.33±2.14 | 17.3±1.96 | 25.5±1.46 |
| Total Cd (mg kg−1) | 0.51±0.02 | 0.59±0.06 | 0.79±0.04 | 0.47±0.02 | 0.92±0.01 | 1.06±0.09 | 0.96±0.06 |
| Total Zn (mg kg−1) | 31.18±1.47 | 26.93±0.43 | 41.36±1.71 | 15.17±0.88 | 25.3±1.44 | 24.6±0.23 | 28.59±1.38 |
| Sand (%) | 20.6±1.54 | 21.6±1.29 | 11.4±0.26 | 24.8±0.65 | 37.4±0.96 | 32.75±1.65 | 31.6±0.57 |
| Silt (%) | 60.2±2.21 | 65.4±2.62 | 73.0±2.41 | 58.2±1.04 | 40.8±1.66 | 39.8±1.26 | 44.0±1.26 |
| Clay (%) | 19.2±1.24 | 13.0±1.05 | 15.6±1.17 | 17.0±0.34 | 21.8±0.82 | 49.6±1.19 | 24.4±1.32 |
Mehlich-3 Extractable Cd Contents (mg kg−1) in Seven Chinese Soils at the onset of Containerized Experiment after Aging of 1 year.
| Cd conc. (mg kg−1) | Mollisols | Ustic Cambosols | Stagnic Anthrosols | Periudic Argosols | Typic Haplustalfs | Udic Ferrisols | Calcaric Regosols |
| Ck | 0.19±0.05c | 0.17±0.07c | 0.22±0.08d | 0.16±0.06e | 0.31±0.12d | 0.42±0.09d | 0.29±0.07c |
| 1 | 0.21±0.04c | 0.19±0.06c | 0.30± 0.04d | 0.41±0.13e | - | - | - |
| 2 | 0.62±0.04bc | 0.48±0.10c | 0.56±0.27d | 0.99±0.29d | 0.69±0.17d | 0.65±0.11d | 0.35±0.06c |
| 4 | 1.19±0.08b | 1.05±0.90bc | 1.17±0.24c | 1.79±0.54c | 1.52±0.26c | 1.46±0.60c | 0.71±0.10bc |
| 6 | 2.21±0.91a | 2.13±0.90b | 2.01±0.47b | 2.98±0.46b | 2.44±0.64b | 2.39±0.90b | 1.38±0.29ab |
| 8 | 2.89±1.04a | 3.28±0.84a | 3.29±0.73a | 3.95±0.41a | 3.58±0.53a | 3.47 ±0.70a | 2.01±0.94a |
Mean values followed by different letters within the same column are significantly different at P <0.05.
Dry Biomass (g plant−1) of Pak choi Shoots Grown on Seven Chinese Soils with Different Loading Rates of Cd.
| Cd conc. (mg kg−1) | Mollisols | Ustic Cambosols | Stagnic Anthrosols | Periudic Argosols | Typic Haplustalfs | Udic Ferrisols | Calcaric Regosols |
| Ck | 1.95±0.18a | 1.54±0.13a | 1.13±0.31a | 0.84±0.29a | 0.73±0.20a | 0.95±0.11a | 2.07±0.46a |
| 1 | 1.91±0.37a | 1.66±0.59a | 1.10±0.30a | 0.63±0.35ab | - | - | - |
| 2 | 2.22±0.58a | 1.02±0.49a | 1.14±0.53a | 0.59±0.47ab | 0.54±0.41ab | 0.79±0.23ab | 1.98±0.11a |
| 4 | 1.89±0.49a | 1.47±0.08a | 1.25±0.28a | 0.51±0.03ab | 0.43±0.38ab | 0.58±0.06abc | 1.95±0.06a |
| 6 | 1.86±0.48a | 1.35±0.13ab | 1.09±0.09a | 0.36±0.02ab | 0.38±0.11ab | 0.50±0.24bc | 1.90±0.15a |
| 8 | 1.54±0.28a | 0.95±0.15b | 1.11±0.51a | 0.17±0.06b | 0.10±0.01b | 0.39±0.29c | 1.75±0.17a |
Mean values followed by different letters within the same column are significantly different at P <0.05.
Cd Concentration (mg kg−1 DW) in Pak choi Grown under Different Cd Levels in Seven Chinese Soils.
| Cd (mg kg−1) | Mollisols | Ustic Cambosols | Stagnic Anthrosols | Periudic Argosols | Typic Haplustalfs | Udic Ferrisols | Calcaric Regosols | |||||||
| Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | Root | Shoot | |
| Ck | 3.41±0.64e | 1.00±0.28e | 2.42±0.45f | 0.48±0.22e | 2.73±0.28e | 0.85±0.12e | 7.26±1.10f | 1.84±0.56f | 12.35±1.68e | 4.37±1.02e | 11.81±0.78e | 6.77±0.92e | 3.11±0.66e | 1.92±0.58b |
| 1 | 5.09±0.91e | 2.53±0.76e | 6.69±0.65e | 2.06±0.98e | 4.12±0.75e | 1.92±0.94e | 21.3±2.01e | 11.00±1.57e | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| 2 | 8.92±1.09d | 4.31±0.54d | 9.30±1.29d | 4.77±0.22d | 8.34±1.11d | 3.94±0.83d | 39.33±3.86d | 28.51±2.61d | 25.41±1.79d | 12.09±1.34d | 19.41±1.27d | 10.06±1.10d | 4.24±0.99d | 2.70±0.99b |
| 4 | 14.21±0.90c | 8.34±1.11c | 14.00±1.43c | 9.01±1.06c | 13.21±1.55c | 7.06±1.06c | 68.43±3.71c | 39.12±3.06c | 39.11±2.28c | 32.51±2.51c | 33.55±1.71c | 20.89±1.46c | 10.37±1.21c | 3.46±1.10b |
| 6 | 21.24±1.20b | 11.75±1.17b | 24.36±1.11b | 17.23±1.50b | 20.21±1.80b | 11.63±1.54b | 117.76±6.53b | 68.21±4.08b | 68.00±3.96b | 41.11±3.01b | 55.53±2.67b | 31.45±2.48b | 14.41±1.03b | 6.57±0.93a |
| 8 | 38.96±1.39a | 18.11±1.12a | 43.21±2.21a | 22.22±1.51a | 28.56±1.42a | 17.63±1.37a | 169.95±8.11a | 89.21±5.70a | 118.21±6.24a | 69.21±4.11a | 85.32±4.28a | 53.73±2.88a | 18.73±1.54a | 8.13±0.87a |
Mean values followed by different letters within the same column are significantly different at P <0.05.
Regression Correlation between Cd Contents in the Edible Shoots of Pak choi and Different Forms of Cd in Various Soils.
| Soil type | Form of Soil Cd | Regression equation |
|
| Mollisols | Total Cd | y = 2.1706x +0.1669 | 0.99 |
| Mehlich-3 extractable Cd | y = 5.7207x +0.7037 | 0.98 | |
| Ustic Cambosols | Total Cd | y = 2.9358x −0.9586 | 0.96 |
| Mehlich-3 extractable Cd | y = 7.0409x +0.7648 | 0.97 | |
| Stagnic Anthrosols | Total Cd | y = 2.2344x −0.5651 | 0.98 |
| Mehlich-3 extractable Cd | y = 5.3848x +0.4458 | 0.99 | |
| Periudic Argosols | Total Cd | y = 11.061x +0.6961 | 0.98 |
| Mehlich-3 extractable Cd | y = 22.326x +1.3968 | 0.99 | |
| Typic Haplustalfs | Total Cd | y = 8.7318x −4.0825 | 0.97 |
| Mehlich-3 extractable Cd | y = 19.123x −0.8046 | 0.98 | |
| Udic Ferrisols | Total Cd | y = 6.6697x −2.7793 | 0.97 |
| Mehlich-3 extractable Cd | y = 14.873x −0.3773 | 0.99 | |
| Calcaric Regosols | Total Cd | y = 0.8936x +0.924 | 0.95 |
| Mehlich-3 extractable Cd | y = 3.5937x +1.1512 | 0.98 |
Soil Cd Threshold Levels for Potential Dietary Toxicity in Edible Part of Pak choi Calculated from the Permissible Limit of Cd (2.04 mg kg−1 DW) in Leafy Vegetables and Regression Equations.
| Soil Type | Total Cd (mg kg−1) | Mehlich-3 extractable Cd (mg kg−1) |
| Mollisols | 0.86 | 0.23 |
| Ustic Cambosols | 1.02 | 0.18 |
| Stagnic Anthrosols | 1.16 | 0.30 |
| Periudic Argosols | 0.12 | 0.03 |
| Udic Ferrisols | 0.72 | 0.16 |
| Typic Haplustalfs | 0.70 | 0.15 |
| Calcaric Regosols | 1.25 | 0.25 |
Stepwise Regression Model for Predicting Cd Concentration (Y) in Edible Part of Pak choi based on Soil Properties.
| Stepwise regression model |
|
|
| ||
|
|
| ||||
| Y = −39.256–15.516 pH−0.944 ZnT−0.379 OM +26.752 CdT | 0.977 | 138.808* | pH | −18.682** | 0.964 |
| ZnT | −3.788** | 0.524 | |||
| OM | −3.652* | 0.376 | |||
| CdT | 2.67* | 0.354 | |||
CdT and ZnT refer to the total Cadmium and Zinc concentrations.
Superscripts * and ** indicate significant levels of probability at 0.05 and 0.01, respectively.