| Literature DB >> 25386558 |
Inailson Márcio Costa da Cunha1, Allyson Santos de Souza1, Eurico Azevedo Dias1, Karlla Danielle Jorge Amorim1, Rodrigo Xavier Soares1, Gideão Wagner Werneck Félix da Costa1, Erik García-Machado2, Pedro Manoel Galetti3, Wagner Franco Molina1.
Abstract
Connectivity levels among Brazilian reef fish fauna populations have attracted growing interest, mainly between mainland shores and oceanic islands. The Pomacentridae, whose phylogeographic patterns are largely unknown in the Atlantic, are a family of dominant fish in reef regions. We present data on the variability and population structure of damselfish Chromis multilineata in different areas along the northeast coast of Brazil and in the waters around the oceanic islands of Fernando de Noronha (FNA) and Saint Peter and Saint Paul Archipelago (SPSPA) through analysis of the HVR1 mtDNA sequence of the control region. The remote SPSPA exhibits the highest level of genetic divergence among populations. Conventional and molecular cytogenetic analysis showed similar karyotype patterns (2n=48 acrocentrics) between these insular areas. Our estimates reveal three genetically different population groups of C. multilineata on the Brazilian coast. The level of genetic structure is higher than previous data suggested, indicating complex panel of interactions between the oceanic island and coastal populations of Brazil.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25386558 PMCID: PMC4217244 DOI: 10.1155/2014/254698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Collection sites of C. multilineata. Arrows indicate the main surface currents in the South Atlantic. BC: Brazil Current; sSEC: southern branch of the South Equatorial Current; cSEC: central branch of the South Equatorial Current; nSEC: northern branch of the South Equatorial Current; SSECC: South Equatorial Countercurrent; NBC: North Brazil Current, based on Lumpkin and Garzoli [34]. Highlighted in the box are C. multilineata individuals showing (a) normal color and (b) a semialbino pattern.
Indexes of genetic diversity among sampled sites of C. multilineata.
| Locality |
| Hn | Hd |
| ts | tv |
| П |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RN | 25 | 25 | 1.00 | 101 | 97 | 9 | 21.437 | 0.070 |
| FNA | 22 | 22 | 1.00 | 88 | 82 | 10 | 20.866 | 0.068 |
| BA | 14 | 14 | 1.00 | 81 | 73 | 13 | 22.714 | 0.073 |
| SPSPA | 14 | 14 | 1.00 | 74 | 66 | 18 | 24.011 | 0.078 |
|
| ||||||||
| Total | 75 | 74 | 0.99 | 146 | 318 | 50 | 22.782 | 0.073 |
N: number of individuals, Hn: haplotype number, Hd: haplotype diversity, S: polymorphic sites, ts: transitions, tv: transversions, K: average of nucleotide differences, and П: nucleotide diversity.
Figure 2Neighbor-joining tree for D-loop sequences of C. multilineata individuals. Lutjanus analis was used as outgroup (*). Bootstrap values (>80%) are indicated on each node of the tree (1,000 pseudoreplicates). RN: Rio Grande do Norte; FNA: Fernando de Noronha Archipelago; BA: Bahia; SPSPA: Saint Peter and Saint Paul Archipelago.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) between C. multilineata collection sites with comparisons established between possible population groups ((A)–(F)).
| Variation source | df | sd | % variation |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (A) (RN + FN + BA) versus (SPSPA) | ||||
| Between populations | 1 | 9.119 | 5.36 | 0.241 |
| Between populations within groups | 2 | 10.248 | 2.53 | 0.007∗ |
| Within groups | 71 | 235.523 | 92.10 | 0.000∗ |
| Total |
|
| ||
|
| ||||
| (B) (RN + BA) versus (FNA + SPSPA) | ||||
| Between populations | 1 | 17.966 | −3.89 | 1.000 |
| Between populations within groups | 2 | 75.922 | 8.20 | 0.000∗ |
| Within populations | 71 | 1076.885 | 95.69 | 0.000∗ |
| Total |
|
| ||
|
| ||||
| (C) (RN + FNA) versus (BA) (SPSPA) | ||||
| Between populations | 2 | 82.357 | 8.6 | 0.164 |
| Between populations within groups | 1 | 11.531 | −0.95 | 0.635 |
| Within populations | 71 | 1076.885 | 92.35 | 0.000∗ |
| Total |
|
| ||
|
| ||||
| (D) (RN) versus (FNA) | ||||
| Between populations | 1 | 11.531 | −0.51 | 0.626 |
| Within populations | 45 | 589.171 | 100.51 | |
| Total |
|
| ||
|
| ||||
| (E) (FNA) versus (SPSPA) | ||||
| Between populations | 1 | 7.363 | 5.97 | 0.003∗ |
| Within populations | 34 | 120.026 | 94.03 | |
| Total | ||||
|
| ||||
| (F) (RN) versus (SPSPA) | ||||
| Between populations | 1 | 42.869 | 9.22 | 0.000∗ |
| Within populations | 37 | 562.080 | 90.78 | |
| Total | ||||
|
| ||||
| (G) (BA) versus (SPSPA) | ||||
| Between populations | 1 | 39.321 | 7.26 | 0.002∗ |
| Within populations | 26 | 487.714 | 92.74 | |
| Total |
|
| ||
*Significant (P < 0.01).
Fixation index F ST (below diagonal) and migrant number (N ) in C. multilineata populations (above diagonal).
| Population | RN | FNA | BA | SPSPA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RN |
| 5.093 | 4.925 | |
| FNA | −0.005 | 14.178 | 6.798 | |
| BA | 0.089∗∗ | 0.034∗ | 6.385 | |
| SPSPA | 0.072∗∗ | 0.068∗ | 0.092∗ |
* P < 0.05; ** P < 0.001.
Figure 3Karyotypes of C. multilineata populations from Saint Peter and Saint Paul and Fernando de Noronha Archipelagos. Giemsa staining (a); C-banding (b); sequential CMA3/DAPI staining (c); and FISH-mapping (d) of 18S (red) and 5S (green) rDNA cistrons, respectively. The ribosomal sites corresponding to pairs 8 and 11 are highlighted in the boxes.
Figure 4Spatial population genetic structure of C. multilineata based on partial sequences of HVR1 in the D-loop region. Population groups: I (I′, I′′), II, and III. BA: Bahia; RN: Rio Grande do Norte; FNA: Fernando de Noronha Archipelago; SPSPA: Saint Peter and Saint Paul Archipelago. The dotted lines delimit group I subpopulations; the solid line along the coast and islands indicates species distribution. The dotted lines represent moderate isolation between regions.