Literature DB >> 25386488

Is surgical intervention for ectopic pregnancy in a low resource set-up avoidable?

Anindita Sinha Babu1, Jayeeta Roy2, Dipanwita Das1, Dipankar Banerjee3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ectopic pregnancy is one of the most common life threatening complications in the first trimester of pregnancy having significant adverse effects on future pregnancy outcome, particularly if salpingectomy is used as the modality of treatment. So medical management is now advocated. For that, cases need to be diagnosed at an earlier stage. Keeping these backgrounds in mind we took up this study to look into the feasibility of conservative management- both medical and surgical - in a tertiary care centre. AIMS: To find out the demographic profile and risk factors of the ectopic pregnancy cases; the clinical presentation of the cases; the mode of treatment offered to the patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: It was a record based retrospective study.All the patients diagnosed as ectopic pregnancy in a tertiary care hospital from January, 2011 to December, 2012, was included in the study.
RESULTS: A total of 234 ectopic cases (1.5% of total deliveries) were recorded, constituting 5.4% of total gynaecological emergencies of this institute. Majority of patients were multigravida (74.4%) and of age group of 26-30years (35.9%). Fallopian tube was the most common site (99.1%) with only two cases in ovary. Ampulla (71.4%) was found to be most frequent site for implantation in fallopian tube. Pelvic inflammatory diseases (38.5%) and past history of induced abortion (35.9%) were major risk factors. Most patients (63.3%) did not use any contraceptives and 30.3% patients used OCP intermittently. No patient presented before 4weeks of gestation, while 69.2% presented between 4-7weeks and the rest beyond 7week. They presented with shock in 44.9% cases. Surgical treatment was offered in 98.3% cases, while medical treatment was offered to only four cases.
CONCLUSION: There is a huge surgical burden due to ectopic pregnancy impinging on our hospital resources. Surgery is resorted to indiscriminately for even those cases that could have been medically treated otherwise. Hence, the need to change the mindset of the care-providers at all levels to opt for medical management of ectopic pregnancy wherever applicable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ectopic pregnancy; Low-resource set-up; Medical management; Retrospective study; Surgical management

Year:  2014        PMID: 25386488      PMCID: PMC4225940          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8226.4815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  12 in total

1.  Fertility following radical, conservative-surgical or medical treatment for tubal pregnancy: a population-based study.

Authors:  J Bouyer; N Job-Spira; J L Pouly; J Coste; E Germain; H Fernandez
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.531

Review 2.  Health benefits of oral contraceptives.

Authors:  J T Jensen; L Speroff
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 3.  Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France.

Authors:  Jean Bouyer; Joël Coste; Taraneh Shojaei; Jean-Luc Pouly; Hervé Fernandez; Laurent Gerbaud; Nadine Job-Spira
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Ectopic pregnancy - two years review from BPKIHS, Nepal.

Authors:  D Uprety; B Banerjee
Journal:  Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ)       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec

5.  Fertility after tubal ectopic pregnancy: results of a population-based study.

Authors:  Marianne de Bennetot; Benoît Rabischong; Bruno Aublet-Cuvelier; Fabien Belard; Hervé Fernandez; Jean Bouyer; Michel Canis; Jean-Luc Pouly
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Outpatient chemotherapy of unruptured ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  T G Stovall; F W Ling; J E Buster
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Factors determining fertility after conservative or radical surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  A dela Cruz; D C Cumming
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Frequency of ectopic pregnancy in a medical centre, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Shaista Aziz; Bothaina Al Wafi; Hussain Al Swadi
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.781

9.  Ectopic gestation following emergency contraceptive pill administration.

Authors:  C L Nielsen; L Miller
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  Outcome of laparoscopic versus traditional surgery for ectopic pregnancies.

Authors:  C J Sultana; K Easley; R L Collins
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.329

View more
  1 in total

1.  Non-operative treatment of ruptured ectopic pregnancy.

Authors:  Trine Dalsgaard Jensen; Luit Penninga
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2016-06-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.