| Literature DB >> 25386109 |
Madhumita Hazra1, Tanushree Dolai2, Akhil Pandey3, Subrata Kumar Dey4, Animesh Patra2.
Abstract
The photo physical properties of two mononuclear pentacoordinated copper(II) complexes formulated as [Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25386109 PMCID: PMC4214117 DOI: 10.1155/2014/104046
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Scheme 1Synthetic procedure of the ligand and its copper(II) complexes.
UV-Vis spectral and electrochemical data of complex-1 and complex-2.
| Compound | UV-Vis data | Electrochemical dataa | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| 262 (10,532), 319 (8,037), 365 (3,125), 667 (236) | −0.779 | −0.602 | −0.690 |
|
| 254 (9.753), 327 (6,534), 362 (2,176), 672 (154) | −0.712 | −0.597 | −0.654 |
aIn DMF; electrochemical data recorded in mV, at 298 K and scan rate 100 mVs−1; E 1/2 = (E pc + E pa)/2.
Figure 1Fluorescence emission properties of the free ligand (HL) and its copper(II) complexes.
Figure 2The HOMO and LUMO orbitals of HL and copper(II) complex-1 and complex-2 obtained from DFT.
Figure 3Electronic spectral titration (a, b) of complex-1 (a) and complex-2 (b) with CT-DNA at 266 nm in Tris-HCl buffer; [complex] = 2.34 × 10−5; [DNA]: a 0.0, b 1.22 × 10−6, c 2.44 × 10−6, d 3.66 × 10−6, e 4.88 × 10−6, f 6.10 × 10−6 mol L−1. The arrow denotes the gradual increase of DNA concentration. Plot of [DNA]/(ε − ε ) versus [DNA] for the absorption titration of CT-DNA with the copper(II) complex-1 (c) and complex-2 (d) in Tris-HCl buffer at the (c, d).
Figure 4Emission spectra (a, b) of the CT-DNA-EB system in Tris-HCl buffer upon the titration of the copper(II) complex-1 (a) and complex-2 (b). λex = 522 nm; [EB] = 9.2 × 10−6 mol L−1, [DNA] = 1.22 × 10−6; [complex]: a 0.0, b 1.36 × 10−5, c 2.72 × 10−5, d 4.08 × 10−5, e 5.44 × 10−5, f 6.80 × 10−5, g 8.16 × 10−5, h 9.52 × 10−5 mol L−1. Arrow shows the intensity change upon the increase of the complex concentration. Plot of I /I against [complex] in fluorescence quenching of CT-DNA-EB system in Tris-HCL buffer (c, d), complex-1 (c), and complex-2 (d), respectively.
Figure 5Cyclic voltammograms of complex-1 in Tris-HCl buffer in the absence (a) and presence (b) of CT-DNA. v = 1 V s−1.
Figure 6Effect of increasing amounts of copper(II) complexes (1 and 2) on the relative viscosity of CT-DNA at 25°C.
Figure 7Optical and fluorescence micrographs of complex-1 (a and b) and complex-2 (c and d) with DNA microwires, respectively. The fluorescence micrograph was obtained by the excitation of the sample with blue light between 450 and 490 nm.
Scheme 2Synthetic route of fluorescent green microwires of complex-1 and complex-2 with DNA.
Figure 8Comparison of the antibacterial activity of HL, complex-1, and complex-2 with standard chloramphenicol drug. DMF solvent does not show any activity.
Antioxidant activity (μM) of ligand and metal complexes (1 and 2) at different concentrations using DPPH assay.
| Compounds | Concentration ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | 125 | 150 | |
|
| 0 | 9.98 | 20.24 | 29.64 | 40.84 | 47.23 | 54.57 |
|
| 0 | 7.57 | 13.54 | 20.65 | 26.87 | 32.98 | 36.43 |
|
| 0 | 8.52 | 15.87 | 25.76 | 34.82 | 41.74 | 47.32 |
|
| 0 | 8.12 | 16.23 | 23.76 | 33.67 | 39.12 | 43.18 |