Literature DB >> 25385690

Formulation and performance of danazol nano-crystalline suspensions and spray dried powders.

Sumit Kumar1, Rajan Jog, Jie Shen, Banu Zolnik, Nakissa Sadrieh, Diane J Burgess.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study focuses on the formulation optimization, in vitro and in vivo performance of differently sized nano-crystalline liquid suspensions and spray-dried powders of a poorly soluble BCS class II compound i.e. Danazol.
METHODS: A DoE approach was utilized to optimize stabilizer concentration and formulate danazol (BCS class II) nano-crystalline suspensions and dry powders via wet milling followed by spray drying. Solubility studies were performed to select best stabilizers. Particle size, PXRD, contact angle measurement and in vitro dissolution were utilized in characterization of the liquid and spray-dried powder formulations.
RESULTS: The liquid nano-crystalline suspensions followed particle size-dependent dissolution rates i.e. faster dissolution for smaller crystals. The spray-dried nano-crystal powders did not show fast dissolution profiles compared to the liquid nano-crystalline suspension. The poor dissolution of the spray-dried powder correlated to its high LogP value (i.e. LogP 4.53) and poor wetting (or polar surface-area). In vivo bioavailability studies showed superior performance of the liquid nano-crystalline suspensions compared to other milled and un-milled formulations.
CONCLUSION: Wet-milling and spray-drying optimization for danazol nano-crystalline suspension was performed. This study indicates that drug candidates with high LogP values and low polar surface area may not be suitable for formulation as dry nano-crystals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25385690     DOI: 10.1007/s11095-014-1567-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm Res        ISSN: 0724-8741            Impact factor:   4.200


  15 in total

Review 1.  The new pre-preclinical paradigm: compound optimization in early and late phase drug discovery.

Authors:  G W Caldwell; D M Ritchie; J A Masucci; W Hageman; Z Yan
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Drug nano- and microparticles processed into solid dosage forms: physical properties.

Authors:  Jonghwi Lee
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 3.  Pursuing the leadlikeness concept in pharmaceutical research.

Authors:  Mike M Hann; Tudor I Oprea
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  Solubility increases associated with crystalline drug nanoparticles: methodologies and significance.

Authors:  Bernard Van Eerdenbrugh; Jan Vermant; Johan A Martens; Ludo Froyen; Jan Van Humbeeck; Guy Van den Mooter; Patrick Augustijns
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 5.  Drug nanoparticles: formulating poorly water-soluble compounds.

Authors:  Elaine M Merisko-Liversidge; Gary G Liversidge
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.902

6.  Influence of drug physicochemical properties on absorption of water insoluble drug nanosuspensions.

Authors:  Wei Li; Peng Quan; Yaqiong Zhang; Jing Cheng; Jie Liu; Dongmei Cun; Rongwu Xiang; Liang Fang
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 5.875

7.  A comparative study of top-down and bottom-up approaches for the preparation of micro/nanosuspensions.

Authors:  Sudhir Verma; Rajeev Gokhale; Diane J Burgess
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.875

8.  Alternative matrix formers for nanosuspension solidification: Dissolution performance and X-ray microanalysis as an evaluation tool for powder dispersion.

Authors:  Bernard Van Eerdenbrugh; Ludo Froyen; Jan Van Humbeeck; Johan A Martens; Patrick Augustijns; Guy Van Den Mooter
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 4.384

9.  Microcrystalline cellulose, a useful alternative for sucrose as a matrix former during freeze-drying of drug nanosuspensions - a case study with itraconazole.

Authors:  Bernard Van Eerdenbrugh; Sofie Vercruysse; Johan A Martens; Jan Vermant; Ludo Froyen; Jan Van Humbeeck; Guy Van den Mooter; Patrick Augustijns
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 5.571

10.  Drying of crystalline drug nanosuspensions-the importance of surface hydrophobicity on dissolution behavior upon redispersion.

Authors:  Bernard Van Eerdenbrugh; Ludo Froyen; Jan Van Humbeeck; Johan A Martens; Patrick Augustijns; Guy Van den Mooter
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 4.384

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  How Has CDER Prepared for the Nano Revolution? A Review of Risk Assessment, Regulatory Research, and Guidance Activities.

Authors:  Katherine M Tyner; Nan Zheng; Stephanie Choi; Xiaoming Xu; Peng Zou; Wenlei Jiang; Changning Guo; Celia N Cruz
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Enhanced bioavailability of danazol nanosuspensions by wet milling and high-pressure homogenization.

Authors:  Naveen Kanthamneni; Satyanarayana Valiveti; Mita Patel; Heather Xia; Yin-Chao Tseng
Journal:  Int J Pharm Investig       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

3.  Dexibuprofen nanocrystals with improved therapeutic performance: fabrication, characterization, in silico modeling, and in vivo evaluation.

Authors:  Naseem Ullah; Shahzeb Khan; Shaimaa Ahmed; Thirumala Govender; Hani S Faidah; Marcel de Matas; Muhammad Shahid; Muhammad Usman Minhas; Muhammad Sohail; Muhammad Khurram
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 4.  Nanomilling of Drugs for Bioavailability Enhancement: A Holistic Formulation-Process Perspective.

Authors:  Meng Li; Mohammad Azad; Rajesh Davé; Ecevit Bilgili
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 6.321

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.