Nicholas R Zwart1, James G Pipe1. 1. Keller Center for Imaging Innovation, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To introduce a multiplatform, Python language-based, development environment called graphical programming interface for prototyping MRI techniques. METHODS: The interface allows developers to interact with their scientific algorithm prototypes visually in an event-driven environment making tasks such as parameterization, algorithm testing, data manipulation, and visualization an integrated part of the work-flow. Algorithm developers extend the built-in functionality through simple code interfaces designed to facilitate rapid implementation. RESULTS: This article shows several examples of algorithms developed in graphical programming interface including the non-Cartesian MR reconstruction algorithms for PROPELLER and spiral as well as spin simulation and trajectory visualization of a FLORET example. CONCLUSION: The graphical programming interface framework is shown to be a versatile prototyping environment for developing numeric algorithms used in the latest MR techniques.
PURPOSE: To introduce a multiplatform, Python language-based, development environment called graphical programming interface for prototyping MRI techniques. METHODS: The interface allows developers to interact with their scientific algorithm prototypes visually in an event-driven environment making tasks such as parameterization, algorithm testing, data manipulation, and visualization an integrated part of the work-flow. Algorithm developers extend the built-in functionality through simple code interfaces designed to facilitate rapid implementation. RESULTS: This article shows several examples of algorithms developed in graphical programming interface including the non-Cartesian MR reconstruction algorithms for PROPELLER and spiral as well as spin simulation and trajectory visualization of a FLORET example. CONCLUSION: The graphical programming interface framework is shown to be a versatile prototyping environment for developing numeric algorithms used in the latest MR techniques.
Authors: Yang Li; Deng Mao; Zhiqiang Li; Michael Schär; Jay J Pillai; James G Pipe; Hanzhang Lu Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Peter J Niedbalski; Matthew M Willmering; Scott H Robertson; Matthew S Freeman; Wolfgang Loew; Randy O Giaquinto; Christopher Ireland; Ronald G Pratt; Charles L Dumoulin; Jason C Woods; Zackary I Cleveland Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Refaat E Gabr; Getaneh B Tefera; William J Allen; Amol S Pednekar; Ponnada A Narayana Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Daniel Treceño-Fernández; Juan Calabia-Del-Campo; Miguel L Bote-Lorenzo; Eduardo Gómez Sánchez; Rodrigo de Luis-García; Carlos Alberola-López Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Michael Schär; Sahar Soleimanifard; Gabriele Bonanno; Jérôme Yerly; Allison G Hays; Robert G Weiss Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-07-19 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: William J Allen; Refaat E Gabr; Getaneh B Tefera; Amol S Pednekar; Matthew W Vaughn; Ponnada A Narayana Journal: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 5.772
Authors: Matthew M Willmering; Peter J Niedbalski; Hui Wang; Laura L Walkup; Ryan K Robison; James G Pipe; Zackary I Cleveland; Jason C Woods Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Souheil J Inati; Joseph D Naegele; Nicholas R Zwart; Vinai Roopchansingh; Martin J Lizak; David C Hansen; Chia-Ying Liu; David Atkinson; Peter Kellman; Sebastian Kozerke; Hui Xue; Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Thomas S Sørensen; Michael S Hansen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-01-29 Impact factor: 4.668