Literature DB >> 25385526

Rotator cuff-quality of life scale: adaptation to Turkish.

Taner Gunes1, Unal Erkorkmaz, Recep Kurnaz, Erkal Bilgic, Murat Asci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The adaptation of scales to the native language and cultural setting of the patient is essential for obtaining more reliable results in scientific studies. In this study, the rotator cuff-quality of life scale (RC-QoLS) was translated into Turkish, and validity and reliability testing was performed on the scale.
METHODS: The scale was first translated into Turkish and then from Turkish to English by another language specialist. Subsequently, the two translations were evaluated by two orthopaedic surgeons who had comprehensive knowledge of English to create the final Turkish version of RC-QoLS. The scale was used for the assessment of 54 patients (average age 56 years) with rotator cuff tear scheduled for surgery. The scale was completed by each patient two times with 1-week interval.
RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged between 0.895 and 0.980 and intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.807 and 0.976, this rendered all domains reliable. The scale gave results very near to those obtained by the original questionnaire with respect to the constructed validity and internal consistency as well as domain relationships.
CONCLUSIONS: In general, the Turkish version of the RC-QoLS is a valid and reliable test with high differentiating power that may be used in the evaluation the quality of life of patients with RC tear in patients who are native Turkish speaker. The use of the Turkish version of RC-QoLS may contribute to the making of a more reliable evaluation in the studies on RC problems in the Turkish society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25385526     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3401-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  15 in total

1.  Two 6-year follow-up studies of large and massive rotator cuff tears: comparison of outcome measures.

Authors:  R M Hollinshead; N G Mohtadi; R A Vande Guchte; V M Wadey
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 2.  Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria.

Authors:  Neil Aaronson; Jordi Alonso; Audrey Burnam; Kathleen N Lohr; Donald L Patrick; Edward Perrin; Ruth E Stein
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function.

Authors:  Dorcas E Beaton; Emil Schemitsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

Authors:  Caroline B Terwee; Sandra D M Bot; Michael R de Boer; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Dirk L Knol; Joost Dekker; Lex M Bouter; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 5.  The 36-item short form.

Authors:  Alpesh A Patel; Derek Donegan; Todd Albert
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  RC-QOL score for rotator cuff pathology: adaptation to Italian.

Authors:  Rocco Papalia; Leonardo Osti; Francesco Leonardi; Vincenzo Denaro; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  Shoulder outcomes measures.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Keith M Baumgarten
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  The impact of rotator cuff pathology on isometric and isokinetic strength, function, and quality of life.

Authors:  Joy C MacDermid; Joanne Ramos; Darren Drosdowech; Ken Faber; Stuart Patterson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  A randomized clinical trial comparing open to arthroscopic acromioplasty with mini-open rotator cuff repair for full-thickness rotator cuff tears: disease-specific quality of life outcome at an average 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Nicholas G Mohtadi; Robert M Hollinshead; Treny M Sasyniuk; Jennifer A Fletcher; Denise S Chan; Feng X Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two rotator cuff disease-specific outcome measures.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Andrea Bean; Varda van Osnabrugge; Joy C MacDermid; Richard Holtby
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  3 in total

1.  Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome questionnaires for patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder.

Authors:  Ertan Şahinoğlu; Gülbin Ergin; Bayram Ünver
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Psychometric analysis of the questionnaires for the assessment of upper limbs available in their Italian version: a systematic review of the structural and psychometric characteristics.

Authors:  Luca Barni; María Ruiz-Muñoz; Manuel Gonzalez-Sanchez; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Jose Merchan-Baeza; Marco Freddolini
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 3.  How to Assess Shoulder Functionality: A Systematic Review of Existing Validated Outcome Measures.

Authors:  Rocio Aldon-Villegas; Carmen Ridao-Fernández; Dolores Torres-Enamorado; Gema Chamorro-Moriana
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.