Literature DB >> 25385119

Disparities in capreomycin resistance levels associated with the rrs A1401G mutation in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Analise Z Reeves1, Patricia J Campbell2, Melisa J Willby1, James E Posey3.   

Abstract

As the prevalence of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis strains continues to rise, so does the need to develop accurate and rapid molecular tests to complement time-consuming growth-based drug susceptibility testing. Performance of molecular methods relies on the association of specific mutations with phenotypic drug resistance and while considerable progress has been made for resistance detection of first-line antituberculosis drugs, rapid detection of resistance for second-line drugs lags behind. The rrs A1401G allele is considered a strong predictor of cross-resistance between the three second-line injectable drugs, capreomycin (CAP), kanamycin, and amikacin. However, discordance is often observed between the rrs A1401G mutation and CAP resistance, with up to 40% of rrs A1401G mutants being classified as CAP susceptible. We measured the MICs to CAP in 53 clinical isolates harboring the rrs A1401G mutation and found that the CAP MICs ranged from 8 μg/ml to 40 μg/ml. These results were drastically different from engineered A1401G mutants generated in isogenic Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which exclusively exhibited high-level CAP MICs of 40 μg/ml. These data support the results of prior studies, which suggest that the critical concentration of CAP (10 μg/ml) used to determine resistance by indirect agar proportion may be too high to detect all CAP-resistant strains and suggest that a larger percentage of resistant isolates could be identified by lowering the critical concentration. These data also suggest that differences in resistance levels among clinical isolates are possibly due to second site or compensatory mutations located elsewhere in the genome.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25385119      PMCID: PMC4291384          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.04438-14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  28 in total

1.  Mutations in the rrs A1401G gene and phenotypic resistance to amikacin and capreomycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Frederick A Sirgel; Marisa Tait; Robin M Warren; Elizabeth M Streicher; Erik C Böttger; Paul D van Helden; Nicolaas C Gey van Pittius; Gerrit Coetzee; Ebrahim Y Hoosain; Mamisa Chabula-Nxiweni; Cindy Hayes; Thomas C Victor; André Trollip
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.431

2.  Effect of mutation and genetic background on drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Lukas Fenner; Matthias Egger; Thomas Bodmer; Ekkehardt Altpeter; Marcel Zwahlen; Katia Jaton; Gaby E Pfyffer; Sonia Borrell; Olivier Dubuis; Thomas Bruderer; Hans H Siegrist; Hansjakob Furrer; Alexandra Calmy; Jan Fehr; Jesica Mazza Stalder; Béatrice Ninet; Erik C Böttger; Sebastien Gagneux
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Predicting extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis phenotypes with genetic mutations.

Authors:  Timothy C Rodwell; Faramarz Valafar; James Douglas; Lishi Qian; Richard S Garfein; Ashu Chawla; Jessica Torres; Victoria Zadorozhny; Min Soo Kim; Matt Hoshide; Donald Catanzaro; Lynn Jackson; Grace Lin; Edward Desmond; Camilla Rodrigues; Kathy Eisenach; Thomas C Victor; Nazir Ismail; Valeru Crudu; Maria Tarcela Gler; Antonino Catanzaro
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Real-time PCR for single-nucleotide polymorphism detection in the 16S rRNA gene as an indicator for extensive drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Marion Blaschitz; Dzenita Hasanacevic; Peter Hufnagl; Petra Hasenberger; Verena Pecavar; Liliya Meidlinger; Miriam Konrad; Franz Allerberger; Alexander Indra
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 5.790

5.  Molecular genetics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to aminoglycosides and cyclic peptide capreomycin antibiotics in Korea.

Authors:  Hum Nath Jnawali; Heekyung Yoo; Sungweon Ryoo; Kwang-Jun Lee; Bum-Joon Kim; Won-Jung Koh; Chang-Ki Kim; Hee-Jin Kim; Young Kil Park
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 6.  Tuberculosis: drug resistance, fitness, and strategies for global control.

Authors:  Erik C Böttger; Burkhard Springer
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.183

7.  Putative compensatory mutations in the rpoC gene of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis are associated with ongoing transmission.

Authors:  M de Vos; B Müller; S Borrell; P A Black; P D van Helden; R M Warren; S Gagneux; T C Victor
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Mycobacterial recombineering.

Authors:  Julia C van Kessel; Graham F Hatfull
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2008

9.  Polymorphisms associated with resistance and cross-resistance to aminoglycosides and capreomycin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from South Korean Patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis.

Authors:  Laura E Via; Sang-Nae Cho; Soohee Hwang; Hyeeun Bang; Seung Kyu Park; Hyung Seok Kang; Doosoo Jeon; Seon Yeong Min; Taegwon Oh; Yeun Kim; Young Mi Kim; Vignesh Rajan; Sharon Y Wong; Isdore Chola Shamputa; Matthew Carroll; Lisa Goldfeder; Song A Lee; Steven M Holland; Seokyong Eum; Hyeyoung Lee; Clifton E Barry
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  James C Johnston; Neal C Shahidi; Mohsen Sadatsafavi; J Mark Fitzgerald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Impact of gyrB and eis Mutations in Improving Detection of Second-Line-Drug Resistance among Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from Georgia.

Authors:  N Bablishvili; N Tukvadze; E Shashkina; B Mathema; N R Gandhi; H M Blumberg; R R Kempker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Revisiting the mutant prevention concentration to guide dosing in childhood tuberculosis.

Authors:  Devan Jaganath; H Simon Schaaf; Peter R Donald
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Molecular Investigation of Resistance to Second-Line Injectable Drugs in Multidrug-Resistant Clinical Isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in France.

Authors:  Florence Brossier; Anne Pham; Christine Bernard; Alexandra Aubry; Vincent Jarlier; Nicolas Veziris; Wladimir Sougakoff
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Validation of Novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isoniazid Resistance Mutations Not Detectable by Common Molecular Tests.

Authors:  Justin L Kandler; Alexandra D Mercante; Tracy L Dalton; Matthew N Ezewudo; Lauren S Cowan; Scott P Burns; Beverly Metchock; Peter Cegielski; James E Posey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Distribution of Common and Rare Genetic Markers of Second-Line-Injectable-Drug Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Revealed by a Genome-Wide Association Study.

Authors:  Derek Conkle-Gutierrez; Calvin Kim; Sarah M Ramirez-Busby; Samuel J Modlin; Mikael Mansjö; Jim Werngren; Leen Rigouts; Sven E Hoffner; Faramarz Valafar
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 5.938

6.  Nonmutational compensation of the fitness cost of antibiotic resistance in mycobacteria by overexpression of tlyA rRNA methylase.

Authors:  Pietro Freihofer; Rashid Akbergenov; Youjin Teo; Reda Juskeviciene; Dan I Andersson; Erik C Böttger
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.942

7.  What Is Resistance? Impact of Phenotypic versus Molecular Drug Resistance Testing on Therapy for Multi- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Authors:  Jan Heyckendorf; Sönke Andres; Claudio U Köser; Ioana D Olaru; Thomas Schön; Erik Sturegård; Patrick Beckert; Viola Schleusener; Thomas A Kohl; Doris Hillemann; Danesh Moradigaravand; Julian Parkhill; Sharon J Peacock; Stefan Niemann; Christoph Lange; Matthias Merker
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  A standardised method for interpreting the association between mutations and phenotypic drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Paolo Miotto; Belay Tessema; Elisa Tagliani; Leonid Chindelevitch; Angela M Starks; Claudia Emerson; Debra Hanna; Peter S Kim; Richard Liwski; Matteo Zignol; Christopher Gilpin; Stefan Niemann; Claudia M Denkinger; Joy Fleming; Robin M Warren; Derrick Crook; James Posey; Sebastien Gagneux; Sven Hoffner; Camilla Rodrigues; Iñaki Comas; David M Engelthaler; Megan Murray; David Alland; Leen Rigouts; Christoph Lange; Keertan Dheda; Rumina Hasan; Uma Devi K Ranganathan; Ruth McNerney; Matthew Ezewudo; Daniela M Cirillo; Marco Schito; Claudio U Köser; Timothy C Rodwell
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 16.671

Review 9.  Evolution of drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a review on the molecular determinants of resistance and implications for personalized care.

Authors:  Navisha Dookie; Santhuri Rambaran; Nesri Padayatchi; Sharana Mahomed; Kogieleum Naidoo
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Linking minimum inhibitory concentrations to whole genome sequence-predicted drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains from Romania.

Authors:  Carolien Ruesen; Anca Lelia Riza; Adriana Florescu; Lidya Chaidir; Cornelia Editoiu; Nicole Aalders; Dragos Nicolosu; Victor Grecu; Mihai Ioana; Reinout van Crevel; Jakko van Ingen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.