Literature DB >> 25385086

Can Payers Use Prices to Improve Quality? Evidence from English Hospitals.

Thomas Allen1, Eleonora Fichera1, Matt Sutton1.   

Abstract

In most activity-based financing systems, payers set prices reactively based on historical averages of hospital reported costs. If hospitals respond to prices, payers might set prices proactively to affect the volume of particular treatments or clinical practice. We evaluate the effects of a unique initiative in England in which the price offered to hospitals for discharging patients on the same day as a particular procedure was increased by 24%, while the price for inpatient treatment remained unchanged. Using national hospital records for 205,784 patients admitted for the incentivised procedure and 838,369 patients admitted for a range of non-incentivised procedures between 1 December 2007 and 31 March 2011, we consider whether this price change had the intended effect and/or produced unintended effects. We find that the price change led to an almost six percentage point increase in the daycase rate and an 11 percentage point increase in the planned daycase rate. Patients benefited from a lower proportion of procedures reverted to open surgery during a planned laparoscopic procedure and from a reduction in long stays. There was no evidence that readmission and death rates were affected. The results suggest that payers can set prices proactively to incentivise hospitals to improve quality.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  financial incentives; prices; quality; unintended effects

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25385086     DOI: 10.1002/hec.3121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  6 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of UK provider financial incentives on quality of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rishi Mandavia; Nishchay Mehta; Anne Schilder; Elias Mossialos
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Analytical methods to assess the impacts of activity-based funding (ABF): a scoping review.

Authors:  Gintare Valentelyte; Conor Keegan; Jan Sorensen
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2021-05-18

3.  Limited Consequences of a Transition From Activity-Based Financing to Budgeting: Four Reasons Why According to Swedish Hospital Managers.

Authors:  Lina Maria Ellegård; Anna Häger Glenngård
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 1.730

4.  Is the evidence on the effectiveness of pay for performance schemes in healthcare changing? Evidence from a meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Arezou Zaresani; Anthony Scott
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Assessing the effects of price regulation and freedom of choice on quality: evidence from the physiotherapy market.

Authors:  Piia Pekola; Ismo Linnosmaa; Hennamari Mikkola
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2017-06-23

6.  Estimating causal effects: considering three alternatives to difference-in-differences estimation.

Authors:  Stephen O'Neill; Noémi Kreif; Richard Grieve; Matthew Sutton; Jasjeet S Sekhon
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2016-05-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.