Literature DB >> 25384052

Work-related risk factors for neck pain in the US working population.

Haiou Yang1, Scott Haldeman, Akinori Nakata, BongKyoo Choi, Linda Delp, Dean Baker.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: This study uses the Taylor linearized variance estimation method to compute weighted unadjusted and adjusted prevalence of neck pain by occupation, with a cross-section data set from the 2009 to 2012 National Health Interview Survey.
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore occupational patterns of neck pain and the relationship between long work hours and neck pain in the working population in the United States. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The past research has demonstrated that specific occupations have a high prevalence of neck pain. However, occupational patterns of neck pain in the United States have been understudied.
METHODS: Risk of neck pain was estimated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression with odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) as measures of association.
RESULTS: After controlling for demographic, socioeconomic status, and behavior-related factors and compared with workers in architecture and engineering occupation group, the top 5 occupational groups with significantly higher relative prevalence of neck pain included: military specific (OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.17-5.35); arts, design, entertainment, sports, and media (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.34-2.17); life, physical, and social science (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.33-2.11); health care support (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.23-1.97); and installation, maintenance, and repair (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.21-1.96). Compared with those who worked 40 hours, people who worked 46 to 59 hours (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10-1.30) and 60 or more hours of work per week (OR, 1.35; 95% CI-1.21, 1.51) were more likely to report neck pain.
CONCLUSION: This study adds to the evidence that an individual's occupation and work hours affect workers' risk for neck pain. This study indicates a need for new research efforts and public policies targeted to workers who are susceptible to neck pain in the United States. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25384052     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  Workplace psychosocial and organizational factors for neck pain in workers in the United States.

Authors:  Haiou Yang; Edward Hitchcock; Scott Haldeman; Naomi Swanson; Ming-Lun Lu; BongKyoo Choi; Akinori Nakata; Dean Baker
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Postural ergonomics and work-related musculoskeletal disorders in neurosurgery: lessons from an international survey.

Authors:  Georgios Mavrovounis; Torstein R Meling; Jesus Lafuente; Konstantinos N Fountas; Andreas K Demetriades
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Is tailored treatment superior to non-tailored treatment for pain and disability in women with non-specific neck pain? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Åsa Svedmark; Mats Djupsjöbacka; Charlotte Häger; Gwendolen Jull; Martin Björklund
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Risk factors of non-specific neck pain and low back pain in computer-using office workers in China: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sunyue Ye; Qinglei Jing; Chen Wei; Jie Lu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Prevalence of Neck Pain among Athletes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Pardis Noormohammadpour; Farbod Farahbakhsh; Farzin Farahbakhsh; Mohsen Rostami; Ramin Kordi
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-10-16

6.  Neck musculoskeletal model generation through anthropometric scaling.

Authors:  Paulien E Roos; Anita Vasavada; Liying Zheng; Xianlian Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Quality assessment of systematic reviews of surgical treatment of cervical spine degenerative diseases: an overview.

Authors:  Nelson Astur; Delio Eulalio Martins; Michel Kanas; Rodrigo Góes Medéa de Mendonça; Aaron T Creek; Mario Lenza; Marcelo Wajchenberg
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2022-04-20

8.  The prevalence and associated factors of symptomatic cervical Spondylosis in Chinese adults: a community-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yanwei Lv; Wei Tian; Dafang Chen; Yajun Liu; Lifang Wang; Fangfang Duan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.