Literature DB >> 25383586

Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF) predictors of police officer problem behavior and collateral self-report test scores.

Anthony M Tarescavage1, Gary L Fischler, Bruce M Cappo, David O Hill, David M Corey, Yossef S Ben-Porath1.   

Abstract

The current study examined the predictive validity of Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF; Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008/2011) scores in police officer screenings. We utilized a sample of 712 police officer candidates (82.6% male) from 2 Midwestern police departments. The sample included 426 hired officers, most of whom had supervisor ratings of problem behaviors and human resource records of civilian complaints. With the full sample, we calculated zero-order correlations between MMPI-2-RF scale scores and scale scores from the California Psychological Inventory (Gough, 1956) and Inwald Personality Inventory (Inwald, 2006) by gender. In the hired sample, we correlated MMPI-2-RF scale scores with the outcome data for males only, owing to the relatively small number of hired women. Several scales demonstrated meaningful correlations with the criteria, particularly in the thought dysfunction and behavioral/externalizing dysfunction domains. After applying a correction for range restriction, the correlation coefficient magnitudes were generally in the moderate to large range. The practical implications of these findings were explored by means of risk ratio analyses, which indicated that officers who produced elevations at cutscores lower than the traditionally used 65 T-score level were as much as 10 times more likely than those scoring below the cutoff to exhibit problem behaviors. Overall, the results supported the validity of the MMPI-2-RF in this setting. Implications and limitations of this study are discussed. 2015 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25383586     DOI: 10.1037/pas0000041

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  2 in total

1.  Have Standard Formulas Correcting Correlations for Range Restriction Been Adequately Tested?: Minor Sampling Distribution Quirks Distort Them.

Authors:  Wendy Johnson; Ian J Deary; Thomas J Bouchard
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.821

2.  A national study of sustained use of force complaints in law enforcement agencies.

Authors:  Cori Pryor; John H Boman; Thomas J Mowen; Michael McCamman
Journal:  J Crim Justice       Date:  2019-07-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.