| Literature DB >> 25383362 |
C E R D Alencar1, P A Lima-Filho2, W F Molina3, F A M Freire1.
Abstract
Sexual dimorphism is often observed in Crustaceans. Considering the great diversity of this subphylum, only few reports are found in the literature and most are mainly based on traditional morphometry. The present study uses geometric morphometrics analysis to identify sexual dimorphism by shape variation in the overexploited semiterrestrial crab Ucides cordatus, species with great social and economic importance in South America. Comparative morphology analyses were performed by using the outer face of the propodus of major cheliped, dorsal and anterior region of carapace shape. Significant differences in shape between sexes were detected in these body areas. The causes of dimorphism presented in this species are not clear but, analogous to other possibly associated species, it may be inferred that the causes are with adaptations to body ability of reproductive potential (females), and of reproductive behaviour and agonistics encounters (males). Additional analyses on courtship displays and other reproductive aspects should provide better comprehension of functionality of this morphological differentiation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25383362 PMCID: PMC4213398 DOI: 10.1155/2014/206168
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Ucides cordatus (Linnaeus, 1763): localization of landmarks in each anatomic area. (a) Dorsal area of carapace—C; (b) outer face of major cheliped—MC; and (c) anterior region of cephalothorax—AR.
Ucides cordatus (Linaeus, 1763): list of landmarks descriptions used in sexual dimorphism characterization. Dorsal area of carapace—C; Anterior region of cephalotorax—AR and Outer face of major cheliped—MC.
| Landmarks | Description |
|---|---|
| C | |
| 1 | Middle point of frontal carapace outer margin |
| 2 | Anterolateral margin carapace deviation |
| 3 | Intersection of the anterolateral and supraorbital margin |
| 4 | Intersection point of anterolateral and posterolateral carapace margin |
| 5 | Middle point of posterior carapace margin |
| 6 | Middle point of transversal commissure |
| 7 | Deviation of anterolateral proportion of transversal commissure |
| 8 | Intersection of lateral commissure between hepatic and gastric regions |
| 9 | Intersection of lateral commissure between gastric and cardiac regions |
| 10 | Posterolateral margin deviation with transversal commissure in intestinal area |
| AR | |
| 1 | Middle point of frontal carapace outer margin |
| 2 | Antennula proximal point |
| 3 | Antenna proximal point |
| 4 | Lateral point of the epistomic margin of carapace |
| 5 | Intersection of the lateral margin and supraorbital areas of carapace |
| 6 | Distal point of suborbital carapace margin |
| 7 | Intersection of supraorbital margin, supraorbital carena, and frontal ramification margin of the transversal commissure |
| 8 | Intersection between the suborbital, subhepatic, and pterigostomic regions |
| 9 | Superior middle point of the epistomial margin of carapace |
| 10 | Inferior middle point of the epistomial margin of carapace |
| MC | |
| 1 | Distal point of the superior manus margin |
| 2 | Intersection of the dactyly on superior margin |
| 3 | Intersection between the inferior margin of the dactyly and the gap between the pollex and the dactyl |
| 4 | Proximal point of the pollex |
| 5 | Distal point of the pollex |
| 6 | Inferior margin of chelae in rectilinear distance to the distal point of the superior margin |
| 7 | Deviation of the inferior margin of the manus |
| 8 | Inferior articulation point between the propodus and the carpus |
| 9 | Superior articulation point between the propodus and the carpus |
| 10 | Proximal deviation of the superior margin of the manus |
Ucides cordatus (Linaeus, 1763): statistical results for comparison of shape variation between males and females.
| Analysis | Parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MANOVA∗ | SS | df |
|
| Pillai's trace |
|
| |||||
| C | 0.0252 | 16 | 7.04 | <0.01 | 0.61 |
| AR | 0.0049 | 16 | 3.61 | <0.01 | 0.43 |
| MC | 0.0727 | 16 | 25.35 | <0.01 | 0.87 |
|
| |||||
| DFA |
|
|
|
| Prc dist |
|
| |||||
| C | 186.67 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 2.49 | 0.0304 |
| AR | 86.68 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 1.71 | 0.0145 |
| MC | 263.42 | <0.01 | <0.01 | 5.04 | 0.0455 |
MANOVA, multivariate analysis of variance; DFA, discriminant function analysis; SS, sum square; df, degrees of freedom; T 2, Hotelling's t test; D 2, Mahalanobis distance; Prc dist, Procrustes distance; dorsal area of carapace, C; outer face of the major cheliped, MC; and anterior region of cephalothorax, AR.
∗Represented only shape results.
∗∗Significance value to permutation tests under Procrustes distance among groups.
Figure 2Ucides cordatus (Linnaeus, 1763): comparison of body shape from outline drawing; obtained frequencies from Discriminant function analysis. Deviation between male and female correspondent landmarks, in each structure, represents the vector displacement (deformation grid). (a) Dorsal area of carapace—C; (b) outer face of major cheliped—MC; and (c) anterior region of cephalothorax—AR; gray = female and black = male.