| Literature DB >> 25383311 |
Fatemeh Nejatzadeh-Barandozi1, Fariborz Darvishzadeh2, Ali Aminkhani3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of nano silver and silver nitrate on yield of seed in basil plant. The study was carried out in a randomized block design with three replications.Entities:
Keywords: Basil; Nano silver; Polyphenol compounds; Seed yield; Silver nitrate
Year: 2014 PMID: 25383311 PMCID: PMC4189604 DOI: 10.1186/s13588-014-0011-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Org Med Chem Lett ISSN: 2191-2858
Analysis of variance mean square testing traits
| 2 | 65.95 ns | 34.01 ns | 5446.50** | 1401.62** | 1.15 ns | 1.85 ns | 9.66** | 0.060** | 0.66* | 0.13 ns | 282.63* | |
| 6 | 315.84** | 30.23* | 3775.01** | 794.02** | 0.44 ns | 0.23 ns | 30.40** | 0.044** | 0.35* | 0.26** | 5888.46** | |
| 12 | 30.39 | 10.35 | 773.46 | 116.30 | 0.98 | 0.56 | 0.92 | 0.002 | 0.103 | 0.043 | 65.016 | |
| 10.20 | 8.64 | 9.40 | 5.70 | 10.14 | 14.22 | 4.63 | 3.40 | 11.78 | 11.7 | 9.06 |
* and ** respectively, significant levels of 5% and 1%. LN, leaf number; PH, plant height; DWP, dry weight of plant; DWI, dry weight of inflorescence; LL, leaf length; LW, leaf width; SY, seed yield; WS, weight of 100 seeds; PP, polyphenol; TN, tannin; SC, silver concentration.
Figure 1Effect of nano silver and silver nitrate treatments on concentration of silver. In plant tissue (μg/g dry tissue of plant).
Comparison mean effect of different concentrations of nano silver and silver nitrate on test traits
| Control | 41.530e | 30.977c | 246.94d | 161.90d | 8.300a | 5.040a | 14.62e | 2.01e | 3.160a | 2.220a |
| NS 20 ppm | 46.24de | 34.68abc | 268.38 dc | 174.68 cd | 8.324a | 5.367a | 18.10d | 1.860b | 2.941ab | 1.985ab |
| NS 40 ppm | 50.06cde | 38.392ab | 301.50abc | 188.10bc | 8.501a | 5.351a | 20.41c | 1.761bc | 2.781abc | 1.779bc |
| NS 60 ppm | 53.364 cd | 41.445a | 347.06a | 203.1ab | 8.910a | 5.701a | 22.68b | 1.70 cd | 2.420ab | 1.605 dc |
| NS 100 ppm | 68.130a | 39.810ab | 325.79ab | 210.45a | 9.321a | 5.725a | 24.90a | 1.615d | 2.208c | 1.265d |
| NS 200 ppm | 67.431ab | 7.025abc | 303.72abc | 199.8ab | 9.090a | 5.110a | 23.14b | 1.714 cd | 2.595abc | 1.672bc |
| NS 300 ppm | 57.465bc | 33.500bc | 278.65bcd | 189.30bc | 9.920a | 5.028a | 19.71 cd | 1.785bc | 3.048a | 1.960abc |
| LSD | 9.965 | 5.750 | 49.660 | 19.268 | 1.765 | 1.350 | 1.725 | 0.105 | 0.570 | 0.376 |
Mean values, followed by the same letters in each column are not significantly different (Duncan's multiple range test at 5%). NS, nano silver; SN, silver nitrate; LN, leaf number; LN, leaf number; PH, plant height; DWP, dry weight of plant; DWI, dry weight of inflorescence; LL, leaf length; LW, leaf width; SY, seed yield; WS, weight of 100 seeds; PP, polyphenol, TN, tannin.
Figure 2A model for the function of RAN1 in the ethylene signaling pathway. RAN1 is presumed to be localized in the membrane of a post-Golgi compartment. Copper ions received from CCH, a putative copper chaperon, is transported by RAN1 into a post-Golgi compartment, delivering the metal to membrane-targeted ethylene receptor apoproteins that become able to coordinate ethylene after the incorporation of copper ions. In the absence of the hormone, the receptors are active and negatively regulate downstream signaling components, preventing hormone-response phenotypes. Ethylene is expected to inactivate the receptors upon binding, presumably by causing a reduction in histidine kinase/phosphatase activity. This, in turn, results in derepression of downstream signaling components (EIN2, EIN3) and activation of hormone-response phenotypes. The metal-deficient ethylene receptors are nonfunctional, resulting in a constitutively activated signaling pathway.
Figure 3Inhibit biosynthesis of ethylene. Target sites of inhibitors (dotted arrows) are indicated. SAM, S-adenosyl-methionine.