Literature DB >> 25382906

Frequency doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in detection of glaucoma among glaucoma suspects.

Sagarika Patyal1, Atul Kotwal2, Ajay Banarji3, V S Gurunadh4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frequency Doubling perimetry (FDT) has been found to precede visual loss detected by standard automated perimetry (SAP) by as much as four years and the initial development of glaucomatous visual field loss as measured by SAP was found to occur in regions that had previously demonstrated abnormalities on FDT testing.
METHODS: A study on 55 glaucoma suspects (determined as per American Academy Guidelines, Preferred Practice Pattern, Oct 2010), was compared to 50 healthy participants (HP). Both glaucoma suspects and HP underwent SAP and FDT in random order. Only reliable fields were compared.
RESULTS: Mean deviation of FDT Matrix was significantly lower than SAP SITA in suspect and healthy group ; two devices showed significant correlation amongst both groups (suspects p = 0.002, healthy p = 0.011). Significant difference was found in PSD of SAP SITA and FDT Matrix (p = 0.001) in the glaucoma suspect group, PSD of FDT Matrix was significantly higher than PSD of SAP SITA in the healthy group (p < 0.001). PSD of SAP SITA significantly correlated with FDT Matrix PSD in glaucoma group (r = 0.579; p = 0.001) but no significant correlation found in healthy group (r = 0.153; p = 0.290). Percentages of normal test locations significantly higher in FDT Matrix compared to SAP SITA in glaucoma suspects and healthy participants.
CONCLUSION: FDT correlates well with SAP and may be used for patients who are unable to perform well and reliably with SAP but does not show any features of earlier glaucoma changes in this study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frequency doubling perimetry; Glaucoma suspects; Standard automated perimetry

Year:  2014        PMID: 25382906      PMCID: PMC4223212          DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2013.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  8 in total

Review 1.  Frequency-doubling technology perimetry.

Authors:  Andrew J Anderson; Chris A Johnson
Journal:  Ophthalmol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-06

2.  Quantifying effects of retinal illuminance on frequency doubling perimetry.

Authors:  William H Swanson; Mitchell W Dul; Susan E Fischer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Evidence for spatial aliasing effects in the Y-like cells of the magnocellular visual pathway.

Authors:  T Maddess; J M Hemmi; A C James
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings.

Authors:  D H Kelly
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1981-09

5.  Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.

Authors:  Paul H Artes; Donna M Hutchison; Marcelo T Nicolela; Raymond P LeBlanc; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Comparison of visual field defects using matrix perimetry and standard achromatic perimetry.

Authors:  Avni Patel; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  C I Clement; I Goldberg; P R Healey; S Graham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Detection of early visual field loss in glaucoma using frequency-doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry.

Authors:  John A Landers; Ivan Goldberg; Stuart L Graham
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-12
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Letter to editor.

Authors:  Neeraj Bhargava
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.