Literature DB >> 25382641

The use of sling vs sphincter in post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence.

Siska Van Bruwaene1, Dirk De Ridder1, Frank Van der Aa1.   

Abstract

The artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is considered the 'gold standard' in post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence. However, in recent years, male slings have gained much popularity due to the ease of surgery, good functional results and low complications rates. This review systematically shows the evidence for the different sling systems, describes the working mechanism, and compares their efficacy against that of the AUS. Furthermore subgroups of patients are defined who are not suited to undergo sling surgery.
© 2014 The Authors. BJU International © 2014 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial urinary sphincter; male; sling; urinary incontinence

Mesh：

Year:  2015        PMID： 25382641     DOI： 10.1111/bju.12976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN： 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.

Authors:  Amjad Alwaal; Catherine R Harris; Mohannad A Awad; Isabel E Allen; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  The impact of prior urethral sling on artificial urinary sphincter outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew J Ziegelmann; Brian J Linder; Marcelino E Rivera; Boyd R Viers; Daniel S Elliott
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Contemporary surgical devices for male stress urinary incontinence: a review of technological advances in current continence surgery.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-07

4.  Re: Artificial urinary sphincter for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a historical cohort from 2004 to 2015.

Authors:  Jose Carlos Truzzi; Carlos Alberto Ricetto Sacomani; Jose Antonio Prezzoti
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

5.  Artificial urinary sphincter for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a historical cohort from 2004 to 2015.

Authors:  Augusto Cesar Soares Dos Santos; Luíza de Oliveira Rodrigues; Daniela Castelo Azevedo; Lélia Maria de Almeida Carvalho; Mariana Ribeiro Fernandes; Sandra de Oliveira Sapori Avelar; Maria Glória Cruvinel Horta; Silvana Márcia Bruschi Kelles
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.541

6.  Proposal of a new way to evaluate the external sphincter function prior male sling surgey.

Authors:  Daniel Carlos Moser; Carlos Arturo Levi D'ancona; Brunno Raphael Iamashita Voris; Daniel Lahan; Kavina Jani; Gerard D Henry
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  Effectiveness of surgical management with an adjustable sling versus an artificial urinary sphincter in patients with severe urinary postprostatectomy incontinence: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedro Luis Guachetá Bomba; Ginna Marcela Ocampo Flórez; Fernando Echeverría García; Herney Andrés García-Perdomo
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2019-09-29

Review 8.  Fundamentals of prosthetic urology.

Authors:  Kole P Akula; Omer A Raheem
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Artificial Urinary Sphincter Is Better Than Slings for Moderate Male Stress Urinary Incontinence With Acceptable Complication Rate: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lede Lin; Wenjin Sun; Xiaotong Guo; Liang Zhou
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-09

10.  Artificial Urinary Sphincter for Postradical Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence - Is It the Best Option?

Authors:  Yun-Sok Ha; Eun Sang Yoo
Journal:  Int Neurourol J       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 2.835
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.