Literature DB >> 25381471

A comparison of acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using LARS artificial ligaments: a randomized prospective study with a 5-year follow-up.

Jia Chen1, Aiqun Gu, Haitao Jiang, Wenjie Zhang, Xiangrong Yu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This prospective randomized study compared acute and chronic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS) artificial ligament in young active adults with a 5-year follow-up.
METHODS: Fifty-five patients were enrolled in this study and divided into two groups based on the elapsed time between the injury and reconstruction: the acute group (3-7 weeks) and the chronic group (6-11 months). The clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm knee scoring scale, the Tegner activity rating, a KT-1000 Arthrometer, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scoring system. Isokinetic strength of the quadriceps and hamstring was assessed using the Biodex System 3 isokinetic dynamometer.
RESULTS: Anterior laxity was decreased and quadriceps/hamstring muscle strength was increased in the acute group compared to the chronic group (p > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in Lysholm scores, Tegner activity scores, and the IKDC evaluation form between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that earlier ACL reconstruction using a LARS artificial ligament may provide an advantage in the treatment and rehabilitation of ACL rupture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25381471     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-014-2108-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  17 in total

1.  ACL rupture and joint laxity progression: a quantitative in vivo analysis.

Authors:  C Signorelli; G Filardo; T Bonanzinga; A Grassi; S Zaffagnini; M Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  [Artificial ligaments applied in anterior cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction: Current products and experience].

Authors:  Tianwu Chen; Shiyi Chen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-01-15

3.  Predictive factors for failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via the trans-tibial technique.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Yong-Beom Park; Dong-Hyun Kim; Nicolas Pujol; Han-Jun Lee
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 3.067

4.  LARS™ in ACL reconstruction: evaluation of 60 cases with 5-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  G Bugelli; G Dell'Osso; F Ascione; E Gori; V Bottai; S Giannotti
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-09-05

5.  LARS synthetic ligaments for the acute management of 111 acute knee dislocations: effective surgical treatment for most ligaments.

Authors:  Pierre Ranger; Andréa Senay; Geneviève Rochette Gratton; Marc Lacelle; Josée Delisle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Effects of Artificial Ligaments with Different Porous Structures on the Migration of BMSCs.

Authors:  Chun-Hui Wang; Wei Hou; Ming Yan; Zhong-Shang Guo; Qi Wu; Long Bi; Yi-Sheng Han
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.443

7.  An Ecological Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, Part 1: Clinical Tests Do Not Correlate With Return-to-Sport Outcomes.

Authors:  Timothy M McGrath; Gordon Waddington; Jennie M Scarvell; Nick Ball; Rob Creer; Kevin Woods; Damian Smith; Roger Adams
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-11-22

8.  Clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using LARS artificial graft with an at least 7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Zhenyu Jia; Chenchen Xue; Wei Wang; Tianze Liu; Xuan Huang; Weidong Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Comparison of artificial graft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhen-Yu Jia; Chen Zhang; Shi-Qi Cao; Chen-Chen Xue; Tian-Ze Liu; Xuan Huang; Wei-Dong Xu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Innovative, intra-articular, prosthetic technique for cranial cruciate ligament reconstruction in dogs: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Luca Omini; Stefano Martin; Adolfo Maria Tambella
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 1.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.