| Literature DB >> 25381405 |
A J Mirza1, A V Lombardi2, M J Morris2, K R Berend2.
Abstract
Direct anterior approaches to the hip have gained popularity as a minimally invasive method when performing primary total hip replacement (THR). A retrospective review of a single institution joint registry was performed in order to compare patient outcomes after THR using the Anterior Supine Intermuscular (ASI) approach versus a more conventional direct lateral approach. An electronic database identified 1511 patients treated with 1690 primary THRs between January 2006 and December 2010. Our results represent a summary of findings from our previously published work. We found that patients that underwent an ASI approach had faster functional recovery and higher Harris hip scores in the early post-operative period when compared with patients who had a direct lateral approach The overall complication rate in our ASI group was relatively low (1.7%) compared with other series using the same approach. The most frequent complication was early periprosthetic femoral fractures (0.9%). The dislocation rate in our series was 0.4% and the prosthetic joint infection rate was 0.1%. We suggest that the ASI approach is acceptable and safe when performing THR and encourages early functional recovery of our patients. ©2014 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior total hip arthroplasty; Complications; Primary; Rapid recovery
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25381405 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34348
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bone Joint J ISSN: 2049-4394 Impact factor: 5.082