Literature DB >> 25381287

Are leftists more emotion-driven than rightists? The interactive influence of ideology and emotions on support for policies.

Ruthie Pliskin1, Daniel Bar-Tal2, Gal Sheppes2, Eran Halperin3.   

Abstract

Although emotions and ideology are important factors guiding policy support in conflict, their interactive influence remains unclear. Based on prior findings that ideological leftists' beliefs are more susceptible to change than rightists' beliefs, we tested a somewhat counterintuitive extension that leftists would be more susceptible to influence by their emotional reactions than rightists. In three laboratory studies, inducing positive and negative emotions affected Jewish-Israeli leftists', but not rightists', support for conciliatory policies toward an adversarial (Studies 1 and 3) and a non-adversarial (Study 2) outgroup. Three additional field studies showed that positive and negative emotions were related to leftists', but not rightists', policy support in positive as well as highly negative conflict-related contexts, among both Jewish (Studies 4 and 5) and Palestinian (Study 6) citizens of Israel. Across different conflicts, emotions, conflict-related contexts, and even populations, leftists' policy support changed in accordance with emotional reactions more than rightists' policy support.
© 2014 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

Keywords:  conflict; emotion; ideology; intergroup processes; political psychology

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25381287     DOI: 10.1177/0146167214554589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0146-1672


  1 in total

1.  Moderating attitudes in times of violence through paradoxical thinking intervention.

Authors:  Boaz Hameiri; Roni Porat; Daniel Bar-Tal; Eran Halperin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.