| Literature DB >> 25381259 |
B Duarte1, D Santos2, H Silva3, J C Marques4, I Caçador2, N Sleimi5.
Abstract
Waterlogging and submergence are the major constraints to which wetland plants are subjected, with inevitable impacts on their physiology and productivity. Global warming and climate change, as driving forces of sea level rise, tend to increase such submersion periods and also modify the carbonate chemistry of the water column due to the increased concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere. In the present work, the underwater O2 fluxes in the leaves of two abundant Mediterranean halophytes were evaluated at different levels of dissolved CO2. Photosynthetic enhancement due to increased dissolved CO2 was confirmed for both Halimione portulacoides and Spartina maritima, probably due to high tissue porosity, formation of leaf gas films and reduction of the oxygenase activity of Rubisco. Enhancement of the photosynthetic rates in H. portulacoides and S. maritima was concomitant with an increase in energy trapping and transfer, mostly due to enhancement of the carboxylation reaction of Rubisco, leading to a reduction of the energy costs for carbon fixation. Transposing these findings to the ecosystem, and assuming increased dissolved CO2 concentration scenarios, the halophyte community displays a new ecosystem function, increasing the water column oxygenation and thus reinforcing their role as principal primary producers of the estuarine system. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.Entities:
Keywords: Halophytes; PSII photochemistry; rising CO2; underwater photosynthesis.
Year: 2014 PMID: 25381259 PMCID: PMC4260444 DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plu067
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AoB Plants Impact factor: 3.276
Summary of fluorometric analysis parameters and their description. NPQ, non-photochemical quenching.
| Basal fluorescence under weak actinic light in light- and dark-adapted leaves | |
| Maximum fluorescence measured after a saturating pulse in light- and dark-adapted leaves | |
| Variable fluorescence light ( | |
| PSII operational and maximum quantum yield | Light- and dark-adapted quantum yield of primary photochemistry, equal to the efficiency by which an absorbed photon trapped by the PSII reaction centre will result in the reduction of |
| NPQ | |
| rETR | Relative ETR at each light intensity (rETR = QY × PAR × 0.5) |
| Photosynthetic efficiency, obtained from the initial slope of the RLC | |
| Maximum yield of primary photochemistry | |
| Probability that an absorbed photon will move an electron into the ETC | |
| Quantum yield of the non-photochemical reactions | |
| Probability of a PSII-trapped electron to be transported from | |
| Grouping probability is a direct measure of the connectivity between the two PSII units ( | |
| ABS/CS | Absorbed energy flux ( |
| TR0/CS | Trapped energy flux (ABS/CS × |
| ET0/CS | Electron transport energy flux ( |
| DI0/CS | Dissipated energy flux (ABS/CS − TR0/CS) |
| Diving force for photosynthesis (DF ABS) | DF ABS = DF RC + DF ( |
| Driving force for trapping electronic energy (DF | DF |
| Driving force for electron transport (DF | DF |
| Driving force for energy absorption (DF RC) | DF RC = log (RC/ABS) |
Figure 1.Oxygen production and consumption by the two tested species under light and dark conditions, at different levels of dissolved CO2 (average ± standard deviation, n = 9. Letters indicate significant differences among CO2 treatments at P< 0.05).
Figure 2.Photosystem II variable fluorescence and quantum efficiencies (operational and maximum) by the two tested species under light and dark conditions, at different levels of dissolved CO2 (average ± standard deviation, n = 9. Letters indicate significant differences among CO2 treatments at P < 0.05).
Figure 3.Kautsky OJIP curves of the two tested species under light and dark conditions, at different levels of dissolved CO2 (average, n = 9).
Figure 4.OJIP-driven photochemical parameters in the two tested species under light and dark conditions, at different levels of dissolved CO2 (average ± standard deviation, n = 9. Letters indicate significant differences among CO2 treatments at P < 0.05).
Figure 5.Photochemical reactions driving forces in the two tested species under light and dark conditions, at different levels of dissolved CO2 (average, n = 9).
Figure 6.Photosystem II antennae connectivity (PG) and energy fluxes on a leaf cross-section basis, in the leaves of the two tested species under light and dark conditions, at different levels of dissolved CO2 (average ± standard deviation, n = 9. Letters indicate significant differences among CO2 treatments at P < 0.05).
Figure 7.Peroxidase (CAT, APx and GPx) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in the leaves of the two tested species under light and dark conditions, at different levels of dissolved CO2 (average ± standard deviation, n = 9. Letters indicate significant differences among CO2 treatments at P < 0.05).
O2 (mol) produced (+)/consumed (−) by each halophyte (considering all the coverage area in the Tagus estuary) at the four considered scenarios per day (including light and dark fluxes).
| Dissolved CO2 concentration (mM) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daytime | 0.05 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 |
| 3952 ± 1397 | 12 050 ± 1397 | 8816 ± 2140 | 7990 ± 1301 | |
| −2039 ± 135 | −879 ± 368 | −590 ± 124 | 801 ± 224 | |
| Night | 0.05 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 |
| −5872 ± 196 | −3882 ± 193 | −316 ± 224 | −297 ± 210 | |
| −6379 ± 465 | −5885 ± 214 | −6557 ± 207 | −5840 ± 449 | |
| Daily budget | 0.05 | 0.5 | 1 | 2 |
| −10 338 | 1404 | 1353 | 2654 | |