Literature DB >> 25381070

A systematic process for recruiting physician-patient dyads in practice-based research networks (PBRNs).

Hubert Robitaille1, France Légaré2, Ghislaine Tre1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recruiting physicians and patients for primary care research is difficult, and low participation can greatly affect the validity of research. While practice-based research networks (PBRNs) offer advantages of scale for recruitment, the barriers are perennial. We designed a systematic process for recruiting physician-patient dyads in PBRNs and tested it in EXACKTE2, a large, cross-sectional, dyadic study.
METHODS: Based on known barriers, we designed a systematic process for recruiting dyads of family physicians and their patients and implemented it in 2 primary care practice-based research networks in Canada: one in Ontario (11 practices) and one in Quebec (6 practices). Dyads (one physician with one patient) were recruited simultaneously to explore their mutual influence during consultations. A key element of the process was a research assistant assigned to each practice. This person closely accompanied the recruitment process, liaising with staff and taking charge of interviews, questionnaires, and follow-up.
RESULTS: In total, 276 physicians and patients were recruited in 17 primary care practices in 2 primary care networks in Ontario and Quebec, representing a participation rate of more than 72% of eligible physicians and more than 64% of eligible patients.
CONCLUSION: We established a systematic process to conduct successful dyadic recruitment of physicians and patients in PBRNs. © Copyright 2014 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient Recruitment; Practice-based Research; Primary Health Care

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25381070     DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.06.140035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med        ISSN: 1557-2625            Impact factor:   2.657


  5 in total

1.  More primary care patients regret health decisions if they experienced decisional conflict in the consultation: a secondary analysis of a multicenter descriptive study.

Authors:  Maria-Margarita Becerra-Perez; Matthew Menear; Stephane Turcotte; Michel Labrecque; France Légaré
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 2.497

2.  Analysis of evidence appraisals for interventional studies in family medicine using an informatics approach.

Authors:  Alain Nathan Sahin; Andrew Goldstein; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 1.458

3.  Collaborating with healthcare providers to understand their perspectives on a hospital-to-home warning signs intervention for rural transitional care: protocol of a multimethod descriptive study.

Authors:  Mary T Fox; Jeffrey I Butler; Souraya Sidani; Evelyne Durocher; Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia; Janet Yamada; Sherry Dahlke; Mark W Skinner
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Using the CollaboraKTion framework to report on primary care practice recruitment and data collection: costs and successes in a cross-sectional practice-based survey in British Columbia, Ontario, and Nova Scotia, Canada.

Authors:  Sabrina T Wong; William Hogg; Fred Burge; Sharon Johnston; Ilisha French; Stephanie Blackman
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 2.497

5.  Strategies for recruitment in general practice settings: the iSOLVE fall prevention pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Amy C W Tan; Lindy Clemson; Lynette Mackenzie; Catherine Sherrington; Chris Roberts; Anne Tiedemann; Constance D Pond; Fiona White; Judy M Simpson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.615

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.