Literature DB >> 25381001

Finding Order in Chaos: A Review of Hospital Ratings.

Wenke Hwang1, Jordan Derk2, Michelle LaClair2, Harold Paz2.   

Abstract

Publicly reported hospital performance data have become widely available to health care consumers in recent years. In response to a growing demand for more readily available health care information, various organizations have begun assessing hospital performance. These performance reporting systems have tremendous potential to aid patients, families, and primary care providers in their clinical decision making. This study takes a systematic approach to review the main features of 9 existing hospital rating systems, each of which is described using 9 areas of evaluation. The hospital rating systems included in this study vary widely in scope, methodology, transparency, and presentation of their results. Their results often present conflicting conclusions regarding the performance of the same hospital. This review of hospital rating systems demonstrates how public reporting may add confusion to patients' health care decision making.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hospital performance; hospital quality of care; hospital safety; public reporting quality measures

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25381001     DOI: 10.1177/1062860614558085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Qual        ISSN: 1062-8606            Impact factor:   1.852


  1 in total

1.  Commercial quality "awards" are not a strong indicator of quality surgical care.

Authors:  Adrienne N Cobb; Taylor R Erickson; Anai N Kothari; Emanuel Eguia; Sarah A Brownlee; Weiwei Yao; Hyunyou Choi; Victoria Greenberg; Joy Mboya; Michael Voss; Daniela Stan Raicu; Raffaella Settimi-Woods; Paul C Kuo
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.982

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.