Literature DB >> 25380974

Trophic level responses differ as climate warms in Ireland.

Alison Donnelly1, Rong Yu, Lingling Liu.   

Abstract

Effective ecosystem functioning relies on successful species interaction. However, this delicate balance may be disrupted if species do not respond to environmental change at a similar rate. Here we examine trends in the timing of spring phenophases of groups of species occupying three trophic levels as a potential indicator of ecosystem response to climate warming in Ireland. The data sets were of varying length (1976-2009) and from varying locations: (1) timing of leaf unfolding and May Shoot of a range of broadleaf and conifer tree species, (2) first appearance dates of a range of moth species, and (3) first arrival dates of a range of spring migrant birds. All three groups revealed a statistically significant (P<0.01 and P<0.001) advance in spring phenology that was driven by rising spring temperature (P<0.05; 0.45 °C /decade). However, the rate of advance was greater for moths (1.8 days/year), followed by birds (0.37 days/year) and trees (0.29 days/year). In addition, the length of time between (1) moth emergence and leaf unfolding and (2) moth emergence and bird arrival decreased significantly (P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively), indicating a decrease in the timing between food supply and demand. These differing trophic level response rates demonstrate the potential for a mismatch in the timing of interdependent phenophases as temperatures rise. Even though these data were not specifically collected to examine climate warming impacts, we conclude that such data may be used as an early warning indicator and as a means to monitor the potential for future ecosystem disruption to occur as climate warms.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25380974     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-014-0914-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  14 in total

1.  Roadmap for assessing regional trends in groundwater quality.

Authors:  Karl Wahlin; Anders Grimvall
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  How does climate warming affect plant-pollinator interactions?

Authors:  Stein Joar Hegland; Anders Nielsen; Amparo Lázaro; Anne-Line Bjerknes; Ørjan Totland
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 9.492

3.  Response of birds to climatic variability; evidence from the western fringe of Europe.

Authors:  Alison Donnelly; Tom Cooney; Eleanor Jennings; Erika Buscardo; Mike Jones
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 3.787

Review 4.  A review of climate-driven mismatches between interdependent phenophases in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Alison Donnelly; Amelia Caffarra; Bridget F O'Neill
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 3.787

5.  Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming.

Authors:  I-Ching Chen; Jane K Hill; Ralf Ohlemüller; David B Roy; Chris D Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Mechanisms underpinning climatic impacts on natural populations: altered species interactions are more important than direct effects.

Authors:  Nancy Ockendon; David J Baker; Jamie A Carr; Elizabeth C White; Rosamunde E A Almond; Tatsuya Amano; Esther Bertram; Richard B Bradbury; Cassie Bradley; Stuart H M Butchart; Nathalie Doswald; Wendy Foden; David J C Gill; Rhys E Green; William J Sutherland; Edmund V J Tanner; James W Pearce-Higgins
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  Early onset of spring increases the phenological mismatch between plants and pollinators.

Authors:  Gaku Kudo; Takashi Y Ida
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  Asynchronous changes in phenology of migrating Broad-tailed Hummingbirds and their early-season nectar resources.

Authors:  Amy M McKinney; Paul J CaraDonna; David W Inouye; Billy Barr; C David Bertelsen; Nickolas M Waser
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Phenological mismatch strongly affects individual fitness but not population demography in a woodland passerine.

Authors:  Thomas E Reed; Stephanie Jenouvrier; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 5.091

10.  Record-breaking early flowering in the eastern United States.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Ellwood; Stanley A Temple; Richard B Primack; Nina L Bradley; Charles C Davis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  The rise of phenology with climate change: an evaluation of IJB publications.

Authors:  Alison Donnelly; Rong Yu
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 3.787

2.  Interannual variations in spring phenology and their response to climate change across the Tibetan Plateau from 1982 to 2013.

Authors:  Lingling Liu; Xiaoyang Zhang; Alison Donnelly; Xinjie Liu
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.787

3.  Climate change: potential implications for Ireland's biodiversity.

Authors:  Alison Donnelly
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.787

4.  Changes in the timing of departure and arrival of Irish migrant waterbirds.

Authors:  Alison Donnelly; Heather Geyer; Rong Yu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  The influence of climate variability on demographic rates of avian Afro-palearctic migrants.

Authors:  Tomáš Telenský; Petr Klvaňa; Miroslav Jelínek; Jaroslav Cepák; Jiří Reif
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Flexible breeding performance under unstable climatic conditions in a tropical passerine in Southwest China.

Authors:  Chen-Yang Liu; Uriel Gélin; Ru-Chuan He; Huan Li; Rui-Chang Quan
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2021-03-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.