BACKGROUND: Achieving full recovery after colorectal cancer surgery means a return to normal physical and psychological health and to a normal social life. Recovery data focusses on time to discharge rather than longer term functionality including return to work (RTW). We aim to assess return to normal holistic function at 1 year after colorectal cancer surgery. METHOD: Questionnaires were created and dispatched to 204 patients who had undergone surgery with curative intent for colorectal cancer, in 2011-2012, in a single teaching hospital. RESULTS: Response rate was 75 % (153/204), 82 % (129/157) for open surgery (OS) and 51 % (24/47) for laparoscopic surgery (LS). Median age was 68 (48-91) years for OS and 65 (36-84) for LS. Eighty-four per cent of patients felt 'ready' and 95 % had adequate pain control upon discharge (no difference between groups). LS reported earlier 'return to full fitness' (1-3 months) than OS (>6 months; Mann-Whitney U, p < 0.05). Recovery from LS was 'better than expected' compared to OS 'worse than expected' (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05). Forty-nine patients were employed preoperatively and 61 % (n = 30) returned to work. RTW was more frequent after LS (Chi-square test, p < 0.05). Length of time to RTW was significantly less after LS [44 (6-84) days] than OS [71 (14-252) days] (t test, p < 0.05). Levels of self-employment were equal between groups. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients failed to RTW at 1 year post-surgery. Patients having LS returned to full fitness faster, felt recovery was shorter and returned to work earlier than OS. We must invest more in managing expectations and provide better post-discharge support to improve RTW.
BACKGROUND: Achieving full recovery after colorectal cancer surgery means a return to normal physical and psychological health and to a normal social life. Recovery data focusses on time to discharge rather than longer term functionality including return to work (RTW). We aim to assess return to normal holistic function at 1 year after colorectal cancer surgery. METHOD: Questionnaires were created and dispatched to 204 patients who had undergone surgery with curative intent for colorectal cancer, in 2011-2012, in a single teaching hospital. RESULTS: Response rate was 75 % (153/204), 82 % (129/157) for open surgery (OS) and 51 % (24/47) for laparoscopic surgery (LS). Median age was 68 (48-91) years for OS and 65 (36-84) for LS. Eighty-four per cent of patients felt 'ready' and 95 % had adequate pain control upon discharge (no difference between groups). LS reported earlier 'return to full fitness' (1-3 months) than OS (>6 months; Mann-Whitney U, p < 0.05). Recovery from LS was 'better than expected' compared to OS 'worse than expected' (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05). Forty-nine patients were employed preoperatively and 61 % (n = 30) returned to work. RTW was more frequent after LS (Chi-square test, p < 0.05). Length of time to RTW was significantly less after LS [44 (6-84) days] than OS [71 (14-252) days] (t test, p < 0.05). Levels of self-employment were equal between groups. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of patients failed to RTW at 1 year post-surgery. Patients having LS returned to full fitness faster, felt recovery was shorter and returned to work earlier than OS. We must invest more in managing expectations and provide better post-discharge support to improve RTW.
Authors: Louisa G Gordon; Brigid M Lynch; Vanessa L Beesley; Nicholas Graves; Catherine McGrath; Peter O'Rourke; Penelope M Webb Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-07-29 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Moniek van Zutphen; Renate M Winkels; Fränzel J B van Duijnhoven; Suzanne A van Harten-Gerritsen; Dieuwertje E G Kok; Peter van Duijvendijk; Henk K van Halteren; Bibi M E Hansson; Flip M Kruyt; Ernst J Spillenaar Bilgen; Johannes H W de Wilt; Jaap J Dronkers; Ellen Kampman Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: J E M Blackwell; B Doleman; C L Boereboom; A Morton; S Williams; P Atherton; K Smith; J P Williams; B E Phillips; J N Lund Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2020-03-10 Impact factor: 5.554
Authors: Theresa A Hastert; Anne C Kirchhoff; Matthew P Banegas; Joanna F Morales; Mrudula Nair; Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Stephanie S Pandolfi; Tara E Baird; Ann G Schwartz Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2020-11-07 Impact factor: 4.452
Authors: Esther Jutten; Schelto Kruijff; Anne Brecht Francken; Martijn F Lutke Holzik; Barbara L van Leeuwen; Henderik L van Westreenen; Kevin P Wevers Journal: BJS Open Date: 2021-11-09