Literature DB >> 25380735

Changing inequalities in cervical cancer: modeling the impact of vaccine uptake, vaccine herd effects, and cervical cancer screening in the post-vaccination era.

Talía Malagón1, Mélanie Drolet1, Marie-Claude Boily2, Jean-François Laprise3, Marc Brisson4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inequalities in cervical cancer may be increased following mass vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV) if girls with low vaccine uptake also have low future participation in cervical cancer screening. We evaluated how vaccine uptake distribution affects inequalities in squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) incidence between groups with different screening participation.
METHODS: We used an individual-based transmission dynamic model of HPV infection and disease (HPV-ADVISE). Females were stratified by routine screening frequency. We modeled the impact of vaccination on SCC incidence rate differences (absolute inequality) and incidence rate ratios (relative inequality) between women who have routine screening intervals of <5 years (frequently screened), ≥5 years (underscreened), and who are never screened. We compared simulations with uniform vaccine uptake with scenarios with unequal vaccine uptake, in which never and underscreened women have lower vaccine uptake than frequently screened women.
RESULTS: Absolute SCC inequalities between groups with different screening rates were predicted to decrease after vaccination, even when women with the lowest screening participation had the lowest vaccine uptake. Herd effects helped reduce absolute inequalities when vaccine uptake was unequal. Conversely, relative SCC inequalities remained unchanged or increased after vaccination. Results were robust to different overall vaccination coverages and sexual mixing scenarios.
CONCLUSION: Though mass HPV vaccination is predicted to substantially decrease SCC incidence rates, never screened women will still have the highest disease burden after vaccination. IMPACT: To reduce both absolute and relative SCC inequalities, public health initiatives will need to address inequalities in both vaccine uptake and in cervical cancer screening participation. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25380735     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  4 in total

1.  National assessment of HPV and Pap tests: Changes in cervical cancer screening, National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Meg Watson; Vicki Benard; Jessica King; Anatasha Crawford; Mona Saraiya
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Moving toward the elimination of cervical cancer: modelling the health and economic benefits of increasing uptake of human papillomavirus vaccines.

Authors:  A Smith; N Baines; S Memon; N Fitzgerald; J Chadder; C Politis; E Nicholson; C Earle; H Bryant
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  An empirical study of the 'underscreened' in organised cervical screening: experts focus on increasing opportunity as a way of reducing differences in screening rates.

Authors:  Jane H Williams; Stacy M Carter
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Effect of HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening in England by ethnicity: a modelling study.

Authors:  Helen C Johnson; Erin I Lafferty; Rosalind M Eggo; Karly Louie; Kate Soldan; Jo Waller; W John Edmunds
Journal:  Lancet Public Health       Date:  2017-12-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.