Literature DB >> 25380703

A comparison of bleeding complications between warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation.

David Snipelisky1, Jordan C Ray, Ryan Ung, Melissa Duart, Christine Kauffman, Fred Kusumoto.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, several novel anticoagulants have been approved for the prevention of thromboembolic strokes as an alternative to warfarin in patients with atrial arrhythmias. Studies have evaluated these medications in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation, yet no data exists to evaluate the bleeding risk in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation procedures.
METHODS: Patients that underwent either cryoballoon ablation alone or with additional radiofrequency ablation over the past 3 years were included in the study. Patients were stratified into one of three subsets based on type of anticoagulation (warfarin, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban). Bleeding complications during the first 48 h and first 2 weeks following the ablation were recorded. Major complications were defined as hemorrhage requiring blood products or need for vascular intervention. Minor complications included prolonged bleeding from catheter insertion site, development of ecchymosis, or hematoma formation. Intraprocedural activated clotting times (ACT) were assessed and compared.
RESULTS: A total of 217 patients met inclusion criteria of which 87 (40.1 %) patients were on warfarin, 90 (41.5 %) patients on dabigatran, and 40 (18.4 %) patients on rivaroxaban. The overall bleeding complication rate was 12.0 %. All complications occurred within the first 48 h post-ablation. Nine (10.3 %) complications occurred in the warfarin subset, ten (11.1 %) in the rivaroxaban subset, and seven (17.5 %) in the dabigatran subset (p = 0.49). The warfarin and dabigatran subsets had higher average ACT levels (424.9 versus 406.5) compared to the rivaroxaban subset (393.4; p < 0.01). Subanalyses found no difference in bleeding complications based on procedure type.
CONCLUSION: Bleeding complications post-ablation were similar for warfarin, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban in patients undergoing cryoballoon ablation. Compared with radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation does not place patients at an increased bleeding risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25380703     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-014-9948-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  14 in total

1.  Feasibility and safety of dabigatran versus warfarin for periprocedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a multicenter prospective registry.

Authors:  Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy; Yeruva Madhu Reddy; Luigi Di Biase; Subba Reddy Vanga; Pasquale Santangeli; Vijay Swarup; Rhea Pimentel; Moussa C Mansour; Andre D'Avila; Javier E Sanchez; J David Burkhardt; Fadi Chalhoub; Prasant Mohanty; James Coffey; Naushad Shaik; George Monir; Vivek Y Reddy; Jeremy Ruskin; Andrea Natale
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  The use of dabigatran immediately after atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Roger A Winkle; R Hardwin Mead; Gregory Engel; Melissa H Kong; Rob A Patrawala
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28

3.  Pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency ablation followed by cryotherapy: a novel strategy to improve clinical outcomes following catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Muzahir H Tayebjee; Ross J Hunter; Victoria Baker; Antonio Creta; Edward Duncan; Simon Sporton; Mark J Earley; Richard J Schilling
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Pulmonary vein isolation using transvenous catheter cryoablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation without risk of pulmonary vein stenosis.

Authors:  Hung-Fat Tse; Sven Reek; Carl Timmermans; Kathy Lai-Fun Lee; J Christoph Geller; Luz-Maria Rodriguez; Benoit Ghaye; Gregory M Ayers; Harry J G M Crijns; Helmut U Klein; Chu-Pak Lau
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-08-20       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Stuart J Connolly; Michael D Ezekowitz; Salim Yusuf; John Eikelboom; Jonas Oldgren; Amit Parekh; Janice Pogue; Paul A Reilly; Ellison Themeles; Jeanne Varrone; Susan Wang; Marco Alings; Denis Xavier; Jun Zhu; Rafael Diaz; Basil S Lewis; Harald Darius; Hans-Christoph Diener; Campbell D Joyner; Lars Wallentin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-08-30       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Novel oral anticoagulants in a real-world cohort of patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Charlotte Eitel; Julia Koch; Philipp Sommer; Silke John; Simon Kircher; Andreas Bollmann; Arash Arya; Christopher Piorkowski; Gerhard Hindricks
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.214

7.  Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the North American Arctic Front (STOP AF) pivotal trial.

Authors:  Douglas L Packer; Robert C Kowal; Kevin R Wheelan; James M Irwin; Jean Champagne; Peter G Guerra; Marc Dubuc; Vivek Reddy; Linda Nelson; Richard G Holcomb; John W Lehmann; Jeremy N Ruskin
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  A comparison of bleeding complications post-ablation between warfarin and dabigatran.

Authors:  David Snipelisky; Christine Kauffman; Karin Prussak; Gretchen Johns; K Venkatachalam; Fred Kusumoto
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 9.  Clinical use of new oral anticoagulant drugs: dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Authors:  Trevor Baglin
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 10.  Current strategies to minimize the bleeding risk of warfarin.

Authors:  David Snipelisky; Fred Kusumoto
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2013-08-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  The anticoagulant effect of heparin during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients taking apixaban or rivaroxaban.

Authors:  L C Brendel; F Dobler; G Hessling; J Michel; S L Braun; A L Steinsiek; P Groha; R Eckl; I Deisenhofer; A Hyseni; M Roest; I Ott; B Steppich
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Effect of pre-procedural interrupted apixaban on heparin anticoagulation during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Aref A Bin Abdulhak; Kevin F Kennedy; Sanjaya Gupta; Michael Giocondo; Brian Ramza; Alan P Wimmer
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran use in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation using the second-generation cryoballoon.

Authors:  Verena Tscholl; Abdullah Khaled-A Lsharaf; Tina Lin; Barbara Bellmann; Patrick Nagel; Klaus Lenz; Ulf Landmesser; Mattias Roser; Andreas Rillig
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 4.  Efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban compared with vitamin K antagonists for peri-procedural anticoagulation in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mate Vamos; Riccardo Cappato; Francis E Marchlinski; Andrea Natale; Stefan H Hohnloser
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 5.214

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.