| Literature DB >> 25380511 |
Roberta Rossini1, Luigi Oltrona Visconti, Giuseppe Musumeci, Alessandro Filippi, Roberto Pedretti, Corrado Lettieri, Francesca Buffoli, Marco Campana, Davide Capodanno, Battistina Castiglioni, Maria Grazia Cattaneo, Paola Colombo, Leonardo De Luca, Stefano De Servi, Marco Ferlini, Ugo Limbruno, Daniele Nassiacos, Emanuela Piccaluga, Arturo Raisaro, PierFranco Ravizza, Michele Senni, Erminio Tabaglio, Giuseppe Tarantini, Daniela Trabattoni, Alessandro Zadra, Carmine Riccio, Francesco Bedogni, Oreste Febo, Ovidio Brignoli, Roberto Ceravolo, Gennaro Sardella, Sante Bongo, Pompilio Faggiano, Claudio Cricelli, Cesare Greco, Michele Massimo Gulizia, Sergio Berti, Francesco Bovenzi.
Abstract
The number of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) is increasing worldwide. Follow-up strategies after PCI are extremely heterogeneous and can greatly affect the cost of medical care. Of note, clinical evaluations and non-invasive exams are often performed to low risk patients. In the present consensus document, practical advises are provided with respect to a tailored follow-up strategy on the basis of patients' risk profile. Three strategies follow-up have been defined and types and timing of clinical and instrumental evaluations are reported. Clinical and interventional cardiologists, cardiac rehabilitators, and general practitioners, who are in charge to manage post-PCI patients, equally contributed to the creation of the present document.Entities:
Keywords: health care policy; percutaneous coronary intervention; risk stratification
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25380511 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25724
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ISSN: 1522-1946 Impact factor: 2.692