Literature DB >> 25380298

Life-cycle fossil energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of bioderived chemicals and their conventional counterparts.

Felix Adom1, Jennifer B Dunn, Jeongwoo Han, Norm Sather.   

Abstract

Biomass-derived chemical products may offer reduced environmental impacts compared to their fossil-derived counterparts and could improve profit margins at biorefineries when coproduced with higher-volume, lower-profit margin biofuels. It is important to assess on a life-cycle basis the energy and environmental impacts of these bioproducts as compared to conventional, fossil-derived products. We undertook a life-cycle analysis of eight bioproducts produced from either algal-derived glycerol or corn stover-derived sugars. Selected on the basis of technology readiness and market potential, the bioproducts are propylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol, 3-hydroxypropionic acid, acrylic acid, polyethylene, succinic acid, isobutanol, and 1,4-butanediol. We developed process simulations to obtain energy and material flows in the production of each bioproduct and examined sensitivity of these flows to process design assumptions. Conversion process data for fossil-derived products were based on the literature. Conversion process data were combined with upstream parameters in the Greenhouse gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy use in Transportation (GREET) model to generate life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and fossil energy consumption (FEC) for each bioproduct and its corresponding petroleum-derived product. The bioproducts uniformly offer GHG emissions reductions compared to their fossil counterparts ranging from 39 to 86% on a cradle-to-grave basis. Similarly, FEC was lower for bioproducts than for conventional products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25380298     DOI: 10.1021/es503766e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  7 in total

Review 1.  Microbial production of advanced biofuels.

Authors:  Jay Keasling; Hector Garcia Martin; Taek Soon Lee; Aindrila Mukhopadhyay; Steven W Singer; Eric Sundstrom
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 60.633

2.  LCA of 1,4-Butanediol Produced via Direct Fermentation of Sugars from Wheat Straw Feedstock within a Territorial Biorefinery.

Authors:  Annachiara Forte; Amalia Zucaro; Riccardo Basosi; Angelo Fierro
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Life Cycle Assessment Framework To Support the Design of Biobased Rigid Polyurethane Foams.

Authors:  Alessandro Manzardo; Alessandro Marson; Martina Roso; Carlo Boaretti; Michele Modesti; Antonio Scipioni; Alessandra Lorenzetti
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2019-08-14

Review 4.  A Review of the Biotechnological Production of Methacrylic Acid.

Authors:  Juliana Lebeau; John P Efromson; Michael D Lynch
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-03-20

Review 5.  Phosphorus-Containing Flame Retardants from Biobased Chemicals and Their Application in Polyesters and Epoxy Resins.

Authors:  Jacob Sag; Daniela Goedderz; Philipp Kukla; Lara Greiner; Frank Schönberger; Manfred Döring
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 6.  Technologies for Biogas Upgrading to Biomethane: A Review.

Authors:  Amir Izzuddin Adnan; Mei Yin Ong; Saifuddin Nomanbhay; Kit Wayne Chew; Pau Loke Show
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-02

7.  Polyamide monomers via carbonate-promoted C-H carboxylation of furfurylamine.

Authors:  Andrew W Lankenau; Matthew W Kanan
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 9.825

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.