| Literature DB >> 25380290 |
Antje Lauer1, Jorge Talamantes2, Laura Rosío Castañón Olivares3, Luis Jaime Medina2, Joe Daryl Hugo Baal1, Kayla Casimiro1, Natasha Shroff1, Kirt W Emery4.
Abstract
Coccidioidomycosis is a fungal disease acquired through the inhalation of spores of Coccidioides spp., which afflicts primarily humans and other mammals. It is endemic to areas in the southwestern United States, including the San Joaquin Valley portion of Kern County, California, our region of interest (ROI). Recently, incidence of coccidioidomycosis, also known as valley fever, has increased significantly, and several factors including climate change have been suggested as possible drivers for this observation. Up to date details about the ecological niche of C. immitis have escaped full characterization. In our project, we chose a three-step approach to investigate this niche: 1) We examined Landsat-5-Thematic-Mapper multispectral images of our ROI by using training pixels at a 750 m × 750 m section of Sharktooth Hill, a site confirmed to be a C. immitis growth site, to implement a Maximum Likelihood Classification scheme to map out the locations that could be suitable to support the growth of the pathogen; 2) We used the websoilsurvey database of the US Department of Agriculture to obtain soil parameter data; and 3) We investigated soil samples from 23 sites around Bakersfield, California using a multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) based method to detect the pathogen. Our results indicated that a combination of satellite imagery, soil type information, and multiplex PCR are powerful tools to predict and identify growth sites of C. immitis. This approach can be used as a basis for systematic sampling and investigation of soils to detect Coccidioides spp.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25380290 PMCID: PMC4224400 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111921
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Location and description of sampling sites used as test data for the remote sensing approach.
| sampling sites and year sampled | coordinates | soil type (map unit symbol) | GS or AS of the pathogen | rodent activity |
|
| ||||
| 1. CSUB Children Center (′08, ′09) | 119° 06′ 29.0′′ W, 35° 20′ 57.0′′ N | Wasco sandy loam (243) | AS | yes |
| 2. Belle Terrace/P Str. (‘11) | 119° 00′ 37.2′′ W, 35° 20′ 49.8′′′ N | Kimberlina Urban land, Cajon-complex (180) | GS | no |
| 3. Belle Terrace/Gay Str. (‘11) | 118° 59′ 22.7′′ W, 35° 20′ 40.0′′′ N | Kimberlina Urban land, Cajon-complex (180) | GS | yes |
| 4. Marella Way (‘11) | 118° 63′ 15.0′′ W, 35° 21′ 40.0′′′ N | Kimberlina Urban land, Cajon-complex (180) | NS | no |
| 5. Flood Plain CSUB (′08, ′09) | 119° 06′ 05.0′′ W, 35° 21′ 16.0′′ N | River Wash (229) | AS | no |
|
| ||||
| 6. Bike Path West (′08, ′09) | 119° 15′ 06.0′′ W, 35° 18′ 20.0′′ N | Cajon sandy loam (125) | NS | yes |
| 7. Lake Webb (′08, ′09) | 119° 16′ 27.0′′ W, 35° 13′ 53.0′′ N | Zalvidea sandy loam (240) | AS | no |
| 8. Cole's Levee Rd. I (′08, ′09, ‘11) | 119° 13′ 60.0′′ W, 35° 14′ 08.0′′ N | Garces loam (180) | GS | yes |
| 9. Cole's Levee Rd. II (‘11) | 119° 13′ 65.3′′ W, 35° 14′ 09.7′′ N | Garces loam (180) | GS | yes |
| 10. Olen Avenue (‘11) | 119° 14′ 50.0′′ W, 35° 14′ 72.0′′ N | Garces loam (180) | GS | yes |
| 11. Valley Street Field (′08, ′09) | 118° 52′ 18.0′′ W, 35° 24′ 29.0′′ N | Delano sandy loam (139) | AS | no |
|
| ||||
| 12. Across CALM (‘11) | 118° 53′ 14.1′′ W, 35° 25′ 50.3′′ N | Chanac Clay Loam (130) | GS | yes |
| 13. Ant Hill Oil Field (′08, ′09, ′11) | 118° 51′ 25.0′′ W, 35° 23′ 50.0′′ N | Chanac Clay Loam (131) | GS | yes |
| 14. Round Mt. Rd. I (′08, ′09) | 118° 52′ 20.0′′ W, 35° 27′ 10.0′′ N | Xeric Torriorthents-Calcic Haploxerept association (174) | AS | yes |
| 15. Round Mt. Rd. II (′08, ′09) | 118° 53′ 30.0′′ W, 35° 28′ 42.0′′ N | Xeric Torriorthents-Calcic Haploxerept association (174) | NS | yes |
| 16. Sharktooth hill I | 118° 55′ 03.4′′ W, 35° 27′ 44.5′′ N | Chanac Pleito Premier Association (305) | nd | yes |
| 17. Sharktooth hill 2 | 118° 54′ 37.0′′ W, 35° 28′ 20.0′′ N | Pleito Trigo Chanac Complex (205) | GS | yes |
| 18. Sharktooth hill 3 | 118° 54′ 33.0′′ W, 35° 28′ 21.3′ N | Pleito Trigo Chanac Complex (205) | GS | yes |
|
| ||||
| 19. Acari Rd. (‘11) | 119° 15′ 26.8′′ W, 35° 23′ 16.1′′ N | Garces silt loam (156) | NS | no |
| 20. Elementary Lne. (‘11) | 119° 15′ 16.1′′ W, 35° 25′ 20.5′′ N | Panoche clay loam (211) | GS | no |
| 21. Beech Str. (‘11) | 119° 15′ 43.5′′ W, 35° 26′ 39.6′′ N | Garces silt loam (156) | GS | yes |
|
| ||||
| 22. Gun Club Rd.(‘11) | 119° 29′ 54.0′′ W, 35° 39′ 34.9′′ N | Garces silt loam (156) | NS | yes |
| 23. McCoy Rd. (‘11) | 119° 31′ 34.3′′ W, 35° 37′ 24.8′′ N | Garces silt loam (156) | NS | yes |
|
| ||||
| 24. Di Giorgio Rd. (‘11) | 118° 57′ 28.7′′ W, 35° 15′ 06.6′′ N | Garces loam (180) | GS | yes |
| 25. Bear Mt. Rd. (‘11) | 118° 57′ 05.9′′ W, 35° 12′ 30.0′′ N | Garces loam (180) | GS | yes |
Growth sites (GS), accumulation sites (AS) and negative sites (NS) were determined by multiplex PCR results, nd: not determined.
* Proof of rodent activity was observed in the immediate neighborhood of the sampling site. Soil disturbing activity was also observed by burrowing owls, coyotes, kit foxes, spiders or large ants at some locations. The dominant rodents observed were ground squirrels, kangaroo rats and hares.
Figure 1False color image of the ROI on April 20, 2008.
Yellow pixels indicate locations in the STH-vegetation class, and .
Figure 2False color image of two San Joaquin Valley prisons.
STH-vegetation class pixels are shown in yellow. The circles indicate the location of the prisons. Upper left: Pleasant Valley State Prison in Fresno County, California. Lower right: Avenal State Prison in Kings County, California. Images were taken on April 20, 2008. Maximum Likelihood Classification scheme was used with .
Probability that the sites fall in the STH-vegetation class, as predicted by Landsat data.
| sampling sites and year sampled |
|
|
| ||||||
|
| 4/20/08 | 4/23/09 | 4/26/10 | 4/29/11 | 4/20/08 | 4/23/09 | 4/26/10 | 4/29/11 | |
| 1. CSUB Children Center (′08, ′09) | N | N | N | N | accumulation site* | N | N | N | N |
| 2. Belle Terrace/P Str. (‘11) |
| N | N | N | growth site* | N | N | N | N |
| 3. Belle Terrace/Gay Str. (‘11) | N | N |
| N | growth site | N | N |
| N |
| 4. Marella Way (‘11) | N | N | N | N | negative site* | N | N | N | N |
| 5. Flood Plain CSUB (′08, ′09) | N | N | N | N | accumulation site | N | N | N | N |
|
| |||||||||
| 6. Bike Path West (′08, ′09) | N | N | N | N | negative site | N | N | N | N |
| 7. Lake Webb (′08, ′09) | N | N | N | N | accumulation site | N | N | N | N |
| 8. Cole's Levee Rd. I (′08, ′09, ‘11) |
|
|
|
| growth site |
| N | N | N |
| 9. Cole's Levee Rd. II (‘11) |
|
|
|
| growth site |
|
|
| N |
| 10. Olen Avenue (‘11) | N | N | N | N | growth site | N | N | N | N |
| 11. Valley Street Field (′08, ′09) | N | N | N | N | accumulation site | N | N | N | N |
|
| |||||||||
| 12. Across CALM (‘11) |
|
| N | N | growth site |
|
| N | N |
| 13. Ant Hill Oil Field (′08, ′09, ′11) |
|
|
| N | growth site |
|
|
| N |
| 14. Round Mt. Rd. I (′08, ′09) |
|
|
| N | accumulation site |
|
|
| N |
| 15. Round Mt. Rd. II (′08, ′09) |
|
| N | N | negative site |
|
| N | N |
| 16. Sharktooth hill I |
|
|
|
| nd* |
|
|
|
|
| 17. Sharktooth hill 2 |
|
|
|
| nd** |
|
|
|
|
| 18. Sharktooth hill 3 (′11) |
|
|
|
| growth site |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| 19. Acari Rd. (‘11) | N | N | N | N | negative site | N | N | N | N |
| 20. Elementary Lne. (‘11) | N | N | N | N | growth site | N | N | N | N |
| 21. Beech Str. (‘11) | N |
| N |
| growth site | N |
| N |
|
|
| |||||||||
| 22. Gun Club Rd.(‘11) |
|
|
|
| negative site |
|
| N |
|
| 23. McCoy Rd. (‘11) |
|
|
|
| negative site |
| N |
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| 24. Di Giorgio Rd. (‘11) | N |
| N | N | growth site | N |
| N | N |
| 25. Bear Mt. Rd. (‘11) |
| N | N | N | growth site |
| N | N | N |
|
| 35 | 42 | 24 | 28 | 32 | 39 | 22 | 26 | |
(Y = in class [indicated in bold], N = not in class).
nd* = not determined in this study.
nd** = not determined in this study, but confirmed as growth site by Swatek (1970).
growth site* = sites were C. immitis was detected at least twice in a deeper soil layer during the late winter/spring (February-May).
accumulation site* = the pathogen could only be detected on the surface of the sampling site and never in a deeper soil layer over a several year period.
negative site* = the pathogen could not be detected in any of the soil samples using the multiplex PCR method as described in this study.
Figure 3Plot of the fraction f of pixels in the STH-vegetation class vs. the threshold value p.
Pixels whose probability of being in the STH-vegetation class is are left unclassified. Pixels with are put in the class. In this plot, for , and for .
Probability that the sites fall in the STH-thermal class, as predicted by Landsat data.
| sampling sites and year sampled | n = 3 |
| n = 2 | ||||||
|
| 4/20/08 | 4/23/09 | 4/26/10 | 4/29/11 | 4/20/08 | 4/23/09 | 4/26/10 | 4/29/11 | |
| 1. CSUB Children Center (′08, ′09) | N | N | N | N | accumulation site | N | N | N | N |
| 2. Belle Terrace/P Str. (‘11) | N | N |
|
| growth site | N | N | N |
|
| 3. Belle Terrace/Gay Str. (‘11) | N |
|
| N | growth site | N |
|
| N |
| 4. Marella Way (‘11) | N | N | N | N | negative site | N | N | N | N |
| 5. Flood Plain CSUB (′08, ′09) | N | N | N | N | accumulation site | N | N | N | N |
|
| |||||||||
| 6. Bike Path West (′08, ′09) | N |
|
|
| negative site | N | N | N | N |
| 7. Lake Webb (′08, ′09) | N | N | N | N | accumulation site | N | N | N | N |
| 8. Cole's Levee Rd. I (′08, ′09, ‘11) | N |
|
|
| growth site | N |
| N |
|
| 9. Cole's Levee Rd. II (‘11) | N |
|
| N | growth site | N |
|
| N |
| 10. Olen Avenue (‘11) | N | N | N | N | growth site | N | N | N | N |
| 11. Valley Street Field (′08, ′09) | N | N |
| N | accumulation site | N | N | N | N |
|
| |||||||||
| 12. Across CALM (‘11) |
| N |
| N | growth site |
| N | N | N |
| 13. Ant Hill Oil Field (′08, ′09, ′11) |
|
|
| N | growth site |
|
| N | N |
| 14. Round Mt. Rd. I (′08, ′09) |
|
|
| N | accumulation site |
|
|
| N |
| 15. Round Mt. Rd. II (′08, ′09) |
|
|
| N | negative site |
|
| N | N |
| 16. Sharktooth hill I |
|
|
|
| nd* |
|
|
|
|
| 17. Sharktooth hill 2 |
|
|
| N | nd** |
|
| N | N |
| 18. Sharktooth hill 3 (′11) |
|
|
| N | growth site |
|
| N | N |
|
| |||||||||
| 19. Acari Rd. (‘11) | N | N | N | N | negative site | N | N | N | N |
| 20. Elementary Lne. (‘11) | N | N | N | N | growth site | N | N | N | N |
| 21. Beech Str. (‘11) | N |
|
| N | growth site | N |
|
| N |
|
| |||||||||
| 22. Gun Club Rd.(‘11) | N | N |
|
| negative site | N | N |
|
|
| 23. McCoy Rd. (‘11) |
|
|
|
| negative site |
| N |
|
|
|
| |||||||||
| 24. Di Giorgio Rd. (‘11) |
|
|
|
| growth site | N |
|
|
|
| 25. Bear Mt. Rd. (‘11) | N | N | N | N | growth site | N | N | N | N |
|
| 35 | 42 | 24 | 28 | 32 | 39 | 22 | 26 | |
(Y = in class [indicated in bold], N = not in class).
nd* = not determined in this study.
nd** = not determined in this study, but confirmed as growth site by Swatek (1970).
Figure 4Left: False color image of the ROI on April 20, 2008.
Yellow pixels indicate locations in the STH-vegetation class. and . The square denotes the location of the city of Bakersfield, the circle on the top indicates the city of Delano, the circle on the right indicates the location of STH, and the circle on the left indicates the location of the city of Taft. Right: Spectral class comparison. STH-thermal class is shown in yellow for the same April 20, 2008 image. Parallelepiped scheme was used with thresholds , with the average surface temperature on the STH training pixels, and the corresponding standard deviation.
Figure 5Extend of soil series in the San Joaquin Valley, CA, which can support the growth of C. immitis.
A: Pleito (brown: SE and NE Kern County, dark orange: W Fresno County, light orange: W Merced County, tan: San Joaquin County) B: Chanac (brown: SE, NE and NW Kern County, dark orange: San Louis Obispo County [Paso Robles area], light orange: San Luis Obispo County, [Carrizo Plains]), and C: Garces soil series (brown: NW Kern County, dark orange: Kings County, light orange: W Tulare County, tan: E Fresno Area), Center for Environmental Informatics at Pennsylvania State University (CEI), http://www.cei.psu.edu/soiltool/semtool.html .
Detailed physical and chemical information obtained from the USDA websoilsurvey database for all sites included in this study.
| soil | sampling sites | |||||
| parameters soil parameters | Elementary Lne. | across CALM Ant Hill Oil Field | Bear Mt. Rd. Di Georgio Rd. Olen Ave. Cole's Levee Rd. | Sharktooth hill | Belle Terrace/Gay Str. Belle Terrace/P Str. Marella Way | McCoy Rd. Gun Club Rd. Acari Rd. Beech Str. |
|
| Panoche clay loam | Chanac clay loam | Garces loam | Pleito-Trigo-Chanac complex | Kimberlina-Urban land Cajon complex | Garces silt loam |
|
| alluvial fans | fan remnants | Alluvium derived from granitoid | Fan remnants, stream terraces | alluvial fans | rims on basin floors |
|
| alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock | alluvium derived from mixed | alluvium derived from granitoid | Alluvium derived from mixed | alluvium derived from igneous and sedimentary rock | alluvium derived from granite |
| (map unit symbols) | 211 | 130/131 | 180 | 205 | 180 | 156 |
|
| ||||||
| Surface texture | clay loam | clay loam | clay loam | clay loam | loamy sand | silt loam |
|
| 31 | 31 | 25.5 | 30 | 12 | 26.8 |
|
| 35.4 | 35.4 | 38 | 33.5 | 71.3 | 34.2 |
|
| 33.6 | 33.6 | 36.5 | 36.5 | 16.7 | 39.1 |
|
| 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.11 |
|
| 4.25 | 4.25 | 5.04 | 3.69 | 2.64 | 2.7 |
| Organic matter | 0.25 | 0.75 | 0.98 | 1.5 | 0.75 | 0.06 |
| Water content (15 bar) | 18.9 | 18.2 | 16.7 | 17.2 | 8.7 | 16.2 |
|
| 32 | 30.1 | 30.9 | 27.8 | 17.7 | 30.2 |
| Sat. hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) (micrometers/s) | 9 | 9 | 8.37 | 2.82 | 28 | 0.8362 |
|
| ||||||
|
| 7.9 | 7.9 | 8.5 | 7.8 | 7.5 | 8.9 |
| CaCO3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC7) | 15 | 24.4 | 20.6 | 24.3 | 7.5 | 13.1 |
| Gypsum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| Electrical conductivity (EC) | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0.5 | 1 | 10.2 |
Indicated in cursive are the parameters which seemed to be most important to distinguish C. immitis growth sites from negative sites.
Figure 6Example of multiplex PCR results.
White arrows point on a 223 bp fragment that represents C. immitis. Site Bear Mt. Rd. shows the strongest ITS amplicons in all soil layers, whereas sites Cole's Levee Rd. and site Across CALM gave a weaker signal in some soil layers, and site Beech Str. was negative. NC = negative control. Bands that indicate the presence of the pathogen in the 2% Agarose gel were confirmed to origin from C. immitis by sequencing.
Agreement between multiplex PCR and MLC for the STH vegetation class and the STH-thermal class to predict growth sites of C. immitis (to agree a prediction by either multiplex PCR or MLC must be confirmed at least once for the four years by the other method).
| STH-vegetation class | ||
|
|
| |
|
| 17 (74%) | 16 (70%) |
|
| 2 (9%) | 3 (13%) |
|
| 4 (17%) | 4 (17%) |
From altogether 25 sites, only 23 were considered, because no multiplex PCR results were obtained for STH sites I and II.