Literature DB >> 25380008

Acute health care resource utilization for ileostomy patients is higher than expected.

Joshua A Tyler1, Justin P Fox, Sekhar Dharmarajan, Matthew L Silviera, Steven R Hunt, Paul E Wise, Matthew G Mutch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients requiring an ileostomy following colorectal surgery are at risk for increased health-care utilization after discharge. Prior studies evaluating postoperative ileostomy care may underestimate health-care utilization by reporting only "same-institution" readmission rates.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the rates of health-care utilization of new ostomates within 30 days of discharge in a multicenter environment.
DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at acute-care, community hospitals in California, Florida, Nebraska, and New York. PATIENTS: Adult patients who underwent colorectal surgery with primary anastomosis, colostomy, or ileostomy between July 2009 and September 2010 were identified. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was hospital-based acute care, defined as hospital readmission or emergency department visit, at any hospital within 30 days of surgery. Multivariate regression models were used to compare the outcomes across groups.
RESULTS: Overall, 75,136 patients underwent colectomy with most receiving a primary anastomosis (79.3%), whereas colostomies were created in 12.8% and ileostomies were created in 8.0%. Diagnoses of colorectal cancer (36.1%) or diverticular disease (22.0%) were most common. Patients with a colostomy (18.8%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.23 [95% CI, 1.17-1.30]) or ileostomy (36.1%; AOR, 2.28 [95% CI 2.15-2.42]) were significantly more likely than patients with a primary anastomosis (16.2%) to have a hospital-based acute-care encounter within 30 days of discharge. Among patients undergoing ileostomy, postoperative infection, renal failure, and dehydration were the most common diagnoses for hospital-based acute-care events. Overall, 20% of these encounters occurred at hospitals other than where the index surgery occurred. LIMITATIONS: Coding accuracy, the inability to capture events occurring in physician offices, and the retrospective study design were limitations of the study.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing colorectal surgery with an ileostomy return to the hospital after discharge twice as frequently as those with a primary anastomosis or colostomy, often to hospitals other than the primary institution. As postdischarge health-care utilization becomes a measured quality metric, it is increasingly important to help these patients to safely transition to home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25380008     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  13 in total

1.  Readmissions With Dehydration After Ileostomy Creation: Rethinking Risk Factors.

Authors:  Carla F Justiniano; Larissa K Temple; Alex A Swanger; Zhaomin Xu; Jenny R Speranza; Christina Cellini; Rabih M Salloum; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Thirty-Day Hospital Readmission After Restorative Proctocolectomy and Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Chronic Ulcerative Colitis at a High-Volume Center.

Authors:  Nicholas P McKenna; Kellie L Mathis; Mohammad Khasawneh; Omair Shariq; Eric J Dozois; David W Larson; Amy L Lightner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Factors associated with hospital readmission following diverting ileostomy creation.

Authors:  W Li; L Stocchi; D Cherla; G Liu; A Agostinelli; C P Delaney; S R Steele; E Gorgun
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  First, Do No Harm: Rethinking Routine Diversion in Sphincter-Preserving Rectal Cancer Resection.

Authors:  William C Chapman; Melanie Subramanian; Senthil Jayarajan; Bilal Makhdoom; Matthew G Mutch; Steven Hunt; Matthew L Silviera; Sean C Glasgow; Margaret A Olsen; Paul E Wise
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Reducing Readmissions While Shortening Length of Stay: The Positive Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Puja M Shah; Lily Johnston; Bethany Sarosiek; Amy Harrigan; Charles M Friel; Robert H Thiele; Traci L Hedrick
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  Readmission After Ileostomy Creation: Retrospective Review of a Common and Significant Event.

Authors:  Daniel R Fish; Carol A Mancuso; Julio E Garcia-Aguilar; Sang W Lee; Garrett M Nash; Toyooki Sonoda; Mary E Charlson; Larissa K Temple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Functional outcomes following ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) in older patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lisa Ramage; Sheng Qiu; Panagiotis Georgiou; Paris Tekkis; Emile Tan
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Cost Effectiveness of a Novel Attempt to Reduce Readmission after Ileostomy Creation.

Authors:  Atif Iqbal; Ahsan Raza; Emina Huang; Lindsey Goldstein; Steven J Hughes; Sanda A Tan
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Clinical and Economic Burden of Peristomal Skin Complications in Patients With Recent Ostomies.

Authors:  Charu Taneja; Debra Netsch; Bonnie Sue Rolstad; Gary Inglese; Lois Lamerato; Gerry Oster
Journal:  J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 1.741

10.  Assessment of Ileostomy Output Using Telemedicine: A Feasibility Trial.

Authors:  Brian K Bednarski; Rebecca S Slack; Matthew Katz; Y Nancy You; John Papadopolous; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; John M Skibber; Surena F Matin; George J Chang
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.585

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.