Literature DB >> 25379852

Prolonged time to surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy increases histopathological response without affecting survival in patients with esophageal or junctional cancer.

Joel Shapiro1, Pieter van Hagen, Hester F Lingsma, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Katharina Biermann, Fiebo J W ten Kate, Ewout W Steyerberg, Ate van der Gaast, J Jan B van Lanschot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation between time to surgery (TTS) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and pathologically complete response (pCR), surgical outcome, and survival in patients with esophageal cancer.
BACKGROUND: Standard treatment for potentially curable esophageal cancer is nCRT plus surgery after 4 to 6 weeks. In rectal cancer patients, evidence suggests that prolonged TTS is associated with a higher pCR rate and possibly with better survival.
METHODS: We identified patients treated with nCRT plus surgery for esophageal cancer between 2001 and 2011. TTS (last day of radiotherapy to day of surgery) varied mainly for logistical reasons. Minimal follow-up was 24 months. The effect of TTS on pCR rate, postoperative complications, and survival was determined with (ordinal) logistic, linear, and Cox regression, respectively.
RESULTS: In total, 325 patients were included. Median TTS was 48 days (p25-p75=40-60). After 45 days, TTS was associated with an increased probability of pCR [odds ratio (OR)=1.35 per additional week of TSS, P=0.0004] and a small increased risk of postoperative complications (OR=1.20, P<0.001). Prolonged TTS had no effect on disease-free and overall survivals (HR=1.00 and HR=1.06 per additional week of TSS, P=0.976 and P=0.139, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged TTS after nCRT increases the probability of pCR and is associated with a slightly increased probability of postoperative complications, without affecting disease-free and overall survivals. We conclude that TTS can be safely prolonged from the usual 4 to 6 weeks up to at least 12 weeks, which facilitates a more conservative wait-and-see strategy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy to be tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25379852     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000966

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  21 in total

1.  [Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy does not negatively impact the postoperative quality of life of esophageal cancer patients].

Authors:  Moritz Luttke; Nils Henrik Nicolay
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 2.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations.

Authors:  Donald E Low; William Allum; Giovanni De Manzoni; Lorenzo Ferri; Arul Immanuel; MadhanKumar Kuppusamy; Simon Law; Mats Lindblad; Nick Maynard; Joseph Neal; C S Pramesh; Mike Scott; B Mark Smithers; Valérie Addor; Olle Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Neoadjuvant therapy for advanced esophageal cancer: the impact on surgical management.

Authors:  Masahiko Ikebe; Masaru Morita; Manabu Yamamoto; Yasushi Toh
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-05-10

Review 4.  Surveillance versus esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients with a clinical complete response after induction chemoradiation.

Authors:  Tara R Semenkovich; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-02

5.  Continuously sutured versus linear-stapled anastomosis in robot-assisted hybrid Ivor Lewis esophageal surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a single-center cohort study.

Authors:  Fiorenzo V Angehrn; Kerstin J Neuschütz; Daniel C Steinemann; Martin Bolli; Lana Fourie; Pauline Becker; Markus von Flüe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.453

6.  Complete pathologic response is independent of the timing of esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Smit Singla; Emmanuel Gabriel; Raed Alnaji; William Du; Kristopher Attwood; Hector Nava; Steven N Hochwald; Moshim Kukar
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-02

7.  Updated protocol of the SANO trial: a stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial comparing surgery with active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Ben M Eyck; Berend J van der Wilk; Bo Jan Noordman; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Sjoerd M Lagarde; Henk H Hartgrink; Peter Paul L O Coene; Jan Willem T Dekker; Michail Doukas; Ate van der Gaast; Joos Heisterkamp; Ewout A Kouwenhoven; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Jean-Pierre E N Pierie; Camiel Rosman; Johanna W van Sandick; Maurice J C van der Sangen; Meindert N Sosef; Edwin S van der Zaag; Manon C W Spaander; Roelf Valkema; Hester F Lingsma; Ewout W Steyerberg; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Accuracy of Detecting Residual Disease After Cross Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Cancer (preSANO Trial): Rationale and Protocol.

Authors:  Bo Jan Noordman; Joel Shapiro; Manon Cw Spaander; Kausilia K Krishnadath; Hanneke Wm van Laarhoven; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Grard Ap Nieuwenhuijzen; Richard van Hillegersberg; Meindert N Sosef; Ewout W Steyerberg; Bas Pl Wijnhoven; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-06-29

9.  MicroRNA-330-5p as a Putative Modulator of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Sensitivity in Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Becky A S Bibby; John V Reynolds; Stephen G Maher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Timing of surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: Impact on outcomes.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Ke-Cheng Zhang; Xiao-Hui Huang; Hong-Qing Xi; Yun-He Gao; Wen-Quan Liang; Xin-Xin Wang; Lin Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.