Literature DB >> 25379844

Multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial of standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings versus coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections: a CHIR-Net trial (BaFO; NCT01181206).

André L Mihaljevic1, Rebekka Schirren, Mine Özer, Stephanie Ottl, Sybille Grün, Christoph W Michalski, Mert Erkan, Carsten Jäger, Carolin Reiser-Erkan, Victoria Kehl, Tibor Schuster, Jürgen Roder, Ulf Clauer, Carolin Orlitsch, Tomas F Hoffmann, Reinhard Lange, Thomas Harzenetter, Phillip Steiner, Milena Michalski, Karl Henkel, Josef Stadler, Georg A Pistorius, Anja Jahn, Robert Obermaier, Robert Unger, Roland Strunk, Frank Willeke, Holger Vogelsang, Bert Halve, Karl-Heinz Dietl, Hendrik Hilgenstock, Alexander Meyer, Hans-Jörg Krämling, Markus Wagner, Michael H Schoenberg, Florian Zeller, Johannes Schmidt, Helmut Friess, Jörg Kleeff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether circular plastic wound edge protectors (CWEPs) significantly reduce the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) in comparison to standard surgical towels in patients undergoing laparotomy.
BACKGROUND: SSIs cause substantial morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, and costs and remain one of the most frequent surgical complications. CWEPs have been proposed as a measure to reduce the incidence of SSIs.
METHODS: In this randomized controlled, multicenter, 2-arm, parallel-group design, patient- and observer-blinded trial patients undergoing open elective abdominal surgery were assigned to either intraoperative wound coverage with a CWEP or standard coverage with surgical towels. Primary endpoint was superiority of intervention over control in terms of the incidence of SSIs within a 30-day postoperative period.
RESULTS: Between September 2010 and November 2012, 608 patients undergoing laparotomy were randomized at 16 centers across Germany. Three patients in the device group and 11 patients in the control group did not undergo laparotomy. Patients' and procedural characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups. Forty-eight patients discontinued the study prematurely, mainly because of relaparotomy (control, n=9; intervention, n=9) and death (control, n=4; intervention, n=7). A total of 79 patients experienced SSIs within 30 days of surgery, 27 of 274 (9.9%) in the device group and 52 of 272 (19.1%) in the control group (odds ratio=0.462, 95% confidence interval: 0.281-0.762; P=0.002). Subgroup analyses indicate that the effect could be more pronounced in colorectal surgery, and in clean-contaminated/contaminated surgeries.
CONCLUSIONS: Our trial shows that CWEPs are effective at reducing the incidence of SSIs in elective and clean or clean-contaminated open abdominal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25379844     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  24 in total

Review 1.  [Current standards of abdominal wall closure techniques : Conventional suture techniques].

Authors:  P Heger; F Pianka; M K Diener; A L Mihaljevic
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Intra-operative wound irrigation to reduce surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tara C Mueller; Martin Loos; Bernhard Haller; André L Mihaljevic; Ulrich Nitsche; Dirk Wilhelm; Helmut Friess; Jörg Kleeff; Franz G Bader
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  [Perioperative complications of the lower gastrointestinal tract : Prevention, recognition and treatment].

Authors:  Y Kulu; M W Büchler; A Ulrich
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  A systematic review of clinical effectiveness of wound edge protector devices in reducing surgical site infections in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Authors:  Muhammad Shafique Sajid; M A Rathore; P Sains; K K Singh
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-01-25

Review 5.  [Prevention of postoperative infections : Evidence-based principles].

Authors:  F Pianka; A L Mihaljevic
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Infection control in colon surgery.

Authors:  Donald E Fry
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Prophylactic negative wound therapy in laparotomy wounds (PROPEL trial): randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Noel Edward Donlon; P A Boland; M E Kelly; K Schmidt; F Cooke; P M Neary; K M Barry; J V Reynolds
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Wound protectors in reducing surgical site infections in lower gastrointestinal surgery: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lisa Zhang; Basheer Elsolh; Sunil V Patel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The Benefits of a Wound Protector in Preventing Incisional Surgical Site Infection in Elective Open Digestive Surgery: A Large-Scale Cohort Study.

Authors:  Keita Itatsu; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Gen Sugawara; Satoaki Kamiya; Masaki Terasaki; Atsushi Morioka; Shinsuke Iyomasa; Kazuhisa Shirai; Masahiko Ando; Masato Nagino
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Dual Ring Wound Protector Reduces Circular Stapler Related Surgical Site Infections in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass.

Authors:  Jennwood Chen; Margaux Miller; Anna Ibele; Ellen Morrow; Robert Glasgow; Eric Volckmann
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.