Literature DB >> 25379754

Improving visual estimates of cervical spine range of motion.

Brandon P Hirsch, Matthew L Webb, Daniel D Bohl, Michael Fu, Rafael A Buerba, Jordan A Gruskay, Jonathan N Grauer1.   

Abstract

Cervical spine range of motion (ROM) is a common measure of cervical conditions, surgical outcomes, and functional impairment. Although ROM is routinely assessed by visual estimation in clinical practice, visual estimates have been shown to be unreliable and inaccurate. Reliable goniometers can be used for assessments, but the associated costs and logistics generally limit their clinical acceptance. To investigate whether training can improve visual estimates of cervical spine ROM, we asked attending surgeons, residents, and medical students at our institution to visually estimate the cervical spine ROM of healthy subjects before and after a training session. This training session included review of normal cervical spine ROM in 3 planes and demonstration of partial and full motion in 3 planes by multiple subjects. Estimates before, immediately after, and 1 month after this training session were compared to assess reliability and accuracy. Immediately after training, errors decreased by 11.9° (flexion-extension), 3.8° (lateral bending), and 2.9° (axial rotation). These improvements were statistically significant. One month after training, visual estimates remained improved, by 9.5°, 1.6°, and 3.1°, respectively, but were statistically significant only in flexion-extension. Although the accuracy of visual estimates can be improved, clinicians should be aware of the limitations of visual estimates of cervical spine ROM. Our study results support scrutiny of visual assessment of ROM as a criterion for diagnosing permanent impairment or disability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25379754

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)        ISSN: 1078-4519


  2 in total

1.  Measurements of cervical range of motion using an optical motion capture system: Repeatability and validity.

Authors:  Minshan Feng; Long Liang; Wu Sun; Guang Wei Liu; Xunlu Yin; Tao Han; Xu Wei; Liguo Zhu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Measurement properties of instruments assessing permanent functional impairment of the spine: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Suelen Meira Goes; Catherine M Trask; Catherine Boden; Brenna Bath; Daniel Cury Ribeiro; Paul Hendrick; Lynne Clay; Xiaoke Zeng; Stephan Milosavljevic
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.