| Literature DB >> 25379288 |
Tarshona Stevens1, Nykia McNeil1, Xiuli Lin1, Maria Ngu-Schwemlein1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to understand the interactions of some antibacterial cationic amphipathic cyclooctapeptides with calcium(II) and their secondary structural preferences. The thermodynamic parameters associated with calcium(II) interactions, between the antibacterial active cyclooctapeptides (COP 1-6) and those that did not exhibit significant activities (COP 7-9), were studied by isothermal titration calorimetry. Calcium(II) binding in the absence and presence of micellar dodecylphosphocholine (DPC), a membrane mimicking detergent, was conducted by circular dichroism (CD). Both groups of cyclopeptides showed weak binding affinities for calcium(II) (Kb ca. 10(-3) M(-1)). However, CD data showed that the antimicrobial peptides COP 1-6 adopted a twisted beta-sheet structure (positive CD absorption band at ca. 203 nm) in the presence of calcium(II) in micellar DPC. In contrast, COP 7-9, which lacked antibacterial activity, adopted a different conformational structure (negative CD absorption band at ca. 203 nm). These results indicate that these cyclopeptides could adopt secondary structural preferences in the presence of calcium(II) amidst a hydrophobic environment to elicit their antibacterial activity. These findings could be useful in facilitating the design of cyclopeptide derivatives that can adopt this beta-sheet-like secondary structure and, thereby, provide a useful molecular template for crafting antibacterial compounds.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 25379288 PMCID: PMC4207412 DOI: 10.1155/2012/730239
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Med Chem ISSN: 2090-2077
HPLC and mass spectrometry data of the synthesized cyclopeptides (COP4–9).
| Test peptides | Retention time | ESI-MS | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| c[ | 15.2 | 981.68 (981.27)a |
|
| c[ | 15.4 | 990.68 (990.24) |
|
| c[ | 18.2 | 956.61 (956.24) |
|
| c[ | 20.2 | 966.88 (966.26) |
|
| c[ | 15.1 | 999.80 (999.21) |
|
| c[ | 16.8 | 982.80 (982.23) |
aCalculated [M]+ values are shown in parenthesis.
Antimicrobial susceptibility test results for COP 1–9.
| Test peptides |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| c[Leu- | 16 | 8 |
|
| c[Leu- | 16 | 8 |
|
| c[ | 16 | 16 |
|
| c[ | 16 | 32 |
|
| c[ | 32 | 128 |
|
| c[ | 128 | 128 |
|
| c[ | >256 | >256 |
|
| c[ | >256 | >256 |
|
| c[ | >256 | >256 |
Figure 1ITC data of (a) COP 1, (b) COP 3, (c) COP 5, and (d) COP 8 following titration with Ca2+. Raw ITC titration data (top panels). Binding isotherms (bottom panels) are derived from the data in the corresponding top panels following correction for dilution and mixing effects.
Thermodynamic parameters data for Ca2+ binding to COP 1–9.
| Test peptide | Binding affinitya for Ca2+
| Change in | Change in Gibbs free energy | Change in |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| (3.4 ± 0.6) × 103 | −0.5 ± 0.1 | −20.5 ± 0.4 | 65.7 ± 1.7 |
|
| (4.8 ± 1.3) × 103 | −0.6 ± 0.04 | −20.9 ± 0.8 | 67.8 ± 3.8 |
|
| (7.9 ± 2.8) × 103 | −2.9 ± 1.7 | −22.2 ± 1.3 | 63.6 ± 5.4 |
|
| (3.3 ± 0.3) × 103 | −0.8 ± 0.04 | −20.5 ± 0.2 | 64.0 ± 0.8 |
|
| (3.1 ± 0.7) × 103 | −11.3 ± 1.3 | −20.1 ± 0.8 | 28.9 ± 4.6 |
|
| (4.7 ± 1.1) × 103 | −1.7 ± 0.1 | −21.3 ± 0.8 | 64.9 ± 2.1 |
|
| (5.3 ± 1.4) × 103 | −2.5 ± 1.3 | −21.3 ± 0.8 | 62.3 ± 6.3 |
|
| (5.4 ± 0.6) × 103 | −2.1 ± 0.1 | −21.3 ± 0.4 | 63.6 ± 2.1 |
|
| (6.4 ± 2.8) × 103 | −10.0 ± 6.7 | −21.8 ± 0.8 | 38.5 ± 23.8 |
|
| (4.9 ± 0.7) × 103 | −5.0 ± 2.1 | −21.3 ± 0.4 | 54.4 ± 7.9 |
|
| (8.0 ± 1.2) × 103 | −3.3 ± 0.8 | −22.6 ± 0.4 | 63.6 ± 3.8 |
|
| (4.7 ± 1.0) × 103 | −0.8 ± 0.4 | −13.8 ± 7.5 | 42.7 ± 7.1 |
|
| (4.9 ± 0.3) × 103 | −2.9 ± 0.8 | −21.3 ± 0.4 | 60.7 ± 0.8 |
|
| (4.4 ± 0.02) × 103 | −0.8 ± 0.1 | −21.3 ± 0.04 | 66.5 ± 0.4 |
|
| (5.4 ± 1.2) × 103 | −3.3 ± 0.4 | −21.3 ± 0.8 | 59.4 ± 2.1 |
|
| (4.1 ± 0.03) × 103 | −1.7 ± 0.2 | −20.9 ± 0.04 | 63.6 ± 0.4 |
aValues correspond to the mean of three experiments and the standard error mean.
bLow heat changes for this association in DPC prevented meaningful calculation of the corresponding thermodynamic parameters with certainty.
cMicellar DPC solutions were prepared at 10 mM DPC.
Figure 2CD spectra of COP 1–9.
Figure 3CD spectra of COP 1–6 in (a) 100 mM Ca2+ only, (b) in 10 mM DPC only, and (c) in 10 mM DPC following titrations with Ca2+ at a Ca2+/COP ratio of 50.
Figure 4CD spectra of COP 7–9 in (a) 100 mM Ca2+ only, (b) in 10 mM DPC only, and (c) in 10 mM DPC following titrations with Ca2+ at a Ca2+/COP ratio of 60.