| Literature DB >> 25379023 |
Esther Korpershoek1, Bart-Jeroen Petri2, Edward Post1, Casper H J van Eijck3, Rogier A Oldenburg4, Eric J T Belt3, Wouter W de Herder5, Ronald R de Krijger1, Winand N M Dinjens1.
Abstract
Adrenal medullary hyperplasias (AMHs) are adrenal medullary proliferations with a size < 1 cm, while larger lesions are considered as pheochromocytoma (PCC). This arbitrary distinction has been proposed decades ago, although the biological relationship between AMH and PCC has never been investigated. Both lesions are frequently diagnosed in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) patients in whom they are considered as two unrelated clinical entities. In this study, we investigated the molecular relationship between AMH and PCC in MEN2 patients. Molecular aberrations of 19 AMHs and 13 PCCs from 18 MEN2 patients were determined by rearranged during transfection (RET) proto-oncogene mutation analysis and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis for chromosomal regions 1p13, 1p36, 3p, and 3q, genomic areas covering commonly altered regions in RET-related PCC. Identical molecular aberrations were found in all AMHs and PCCs, at similar frequencies. LOH was seen for chromosomes 1p13 in 8 of 18 (44%), 1p36 in 9 of 15 (60%), 3p12-13 in 12 of 18 (67%), and 3q23-24 in 10 of 16 (63%) of AMHs, and for chromosome 1p13 in 13 of 13 (100%), 1p36 in 7 of 11 (64%), 3p12-13 in 4 of 11 (36%), and 3q23-24 in 11 of 12 (92%) of PCCs. Our results indicate that AMHs are not hyperplasias and, in clinical practice, should be regarded as PCCs, which has an impact on diagnosis and treatment of MEN2 patients. We therefore propose to replace the term AMH by micro-PCC to indicate adrenal medullary proliferations of less than 1 cm.Entities:
Keywords: AMH, adrenal medullary hyperplasia; Adrenal medullary hyperplasia; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; MEN2; MEN2, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2; PCC, pheochromocytoma; RET, rearranged during transfection proto-oncogene; loss; molecular alterations; pheochromocytoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25379023 PMCID: PMC4212248 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2014.09.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neoplasia ISSN: 1476-5586 Impact factor: 5.715
Clinical and Tumor Data of 32 Tumors from 18 Patients with MEN2.
| Pt | Family | M/F | m/b | Age | Mutation RET | L (cm) | R (cm) | MTC | PHP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A | F | b | 20 | pCys 634 Arg | 7 | 0.4 | + | − |
| 2 | A | M | b | 55 | pCys 634 Arg | 0.7 | – | + | + |
| 3 | B | F | b | 32 | pCys 634 Arg | – | 0.7 | + | + |
| 4 | B | M | b | 42 | pCys 634 Arg | 0.6 | 0.4 | + | + |
| 5 | B | F | b | 18 | pCys 634 Arg | 0.2 | 0.7 | + | + |
| 6 | B | F | b | 24 | pCys 634 Arg | 0.9 | 0.7 | + | − |
| 7 | B | F | b | 50 | pCys 620 Arg | < 1 | < 1 | + | − |
| 8 | C | F | b | 52 | pCys 634 Arg | 2 | 0.8 | + | − |
| 9 | C | F | b | 38 | pCys 634 Arg | 4 | 1.6 | + | + |
| 10 | C | F | b | 38 | pCys 634 Arg | 0.8 | – | + | − |
| 11 | C | F | b | 51 | pCys 634 Arg | 0.9 | 4 | + | + |
| 12 | D | F | b | 29 | pCys 634 Arg | 4 | 0.8 | + | + |
| 13 | E | F | b | 29 | pCys 634 Arg | 5 | 3 | + | − |
| 14 | F | M | b | 26 | pCys 611 Tyr | 0.8 | 3 | + | + |
| 15 | G | M | b | 23 | pMet 918 Thr | 2.5 | 0.6 | + | − |
| 16 | H | F | b | 51 | pCys 634 Arg | – | 1.5 | + | − |
| 17 | I | F | b | 34 | pCys 634 Arg | 0.2 | 0.8 | + | − |
| 18 | J | F | b | 25 | pCys 634 Arg | 4.2 | 2 | + | + |
Pt, patient; M/F, male/female; m/b, malignant/benign; Age, years; L, tumor size in left adrenal gland; R, tumor size in right adrenal gland; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; PHP, primary hyperparathyroidism.
Supplementary Figure 1.Sub-macroscopic and microscopic examples of (A) AMH and (B) PCC.
Microsatellite Markers, Chromosomal Localization, Primer Sequences, and Approximate Product Sizes of the Eight Markers in Four Regions.
| Marker | Localization | Forward 5′→3′ | Reverse 5′→3′ | Size (bp) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | D1S252 | 1p13.1 | AGCTTTTTACTCTTAACCTATTCAT | TCATTAATACACATGTTCTCTGC | 107 |
| 2 | D1S2881 | 1p13.2 | ATCTGCCAGCCCATGA | CAAACAGAGCCTGGCA | 188 |
| 3 | D1S2885 | 1p36.11 | ATCTGCCAGCCCATGA | CAAACAGAGCCTGGCA | 127 |
| 4 | D1S234 | 1p36.11 | GCCCAGGAGGTTGAGG | CTGTAATTCAAGCCTGCCTT | 142 |
| 5 | D3S3681 | 3p12.3 | GTGAGAACCATTTGGGGCAG | CCCTGACAGATAGCTCGCC | 226 |
| 6 | D3S3551 | 3p13 | AACGGAGTTCCCACATAAA | CTTTTGTCTGTATTGCTAATGAACC | 142 |
| 7 | D3S3694 | 3q23 | AGTGTCCATCAACATGGG | GAATCCTGTTATTTGTGCGA | 162 |
| 8 | D3S1569 | 3q24 | GCACCTTGGCTTACCTTCTA | CTTTAAGAACCTTTCAACTGTCC | 234 |
Results of LOH Analyses.
| Pt | Family | Left/Right | Size (cm) | Tumor | 1p13.1 | 1p13.2 | 1p36.11 | 1p36.11 | 3p12.3 | 3p13 | 3q23 | 3q24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1S252 | D1S2881 | D1S2885 | D1S234 | D3S3681 | D3S3551 | D3S3694 | D3S1569 | |||||
| 1 | A | L | 7.0 | PCC | ▄↓ | x | x | NI | x | NI | x | |
| R | 0.4 | AMHN | x | x | NI | ▀↑ | NI | x | ||||
| 2 | A | L | 0.7 | AMHD | ▀↑ | x | ▀↑ | ▀↓ | ▀↑ | ▄↓ | ▄↑ | |
| 3 | B | R | 0.7 | AMHN | ▄↓ | ▄↓ | ▄↓ | |||||
| 4 | B | L | 0.6 | AMHM | ▄↑ | x | x | x | x | ▀↑ | x | ▄↑ |
| R | 0.4 | AMHN | ▄↑ | x | x | x | x | x | x | |||
| 5 | B | L | 0.2 | AMHD | NI | ▀↑ | ▀↑ | ▄↓ | ▀↑ | |||
| R | 0.7 | AMHD | NI | ▀↑ | ||||||||
| 6 | B | L | 0.9 | AMHD | ▀↓ | ▀↓ | ▀↓ | ▄↓ | NI | |||
| R | 0.7 | AMHD | ▄↓ | ▄↓ | ▄↓ | ▄↓ | NI | |||||
| 7 | B | L | u | AMHN | ▀↑ | |||||||
| R | u | AMHN | ▀↑ | |||||||||
| 8 | C | L | 2.0 | PCC | ▄↑ | ▀↑ | x | x | x | x | NI | ▄↓ |
| R | 0.8 | AMHD | ▀↑ | x | x | ▄↓ | NI | ▀↑ | ||||
| 9 | C | L | 4.0 | PCC | ▄↓ | x | NI | ▄↓ | ▀↑ | ▄↓ | ||
| R | 1.6 | PCC | ▄↓ | ▀↓ | NI | ▄↑ | ▀↑ | ▄↓ | ||||
| 10 | C | L | 0.8 | AMHN | NI | ▄↓ | ▄↓ | ▀↑ | ||||
| 11 | C | L | 0.9 | AMHN | ▄↑ | NI | ▄↓ | |||||
| R | 4.0 | PCC | ▀↓ | NI | ▀↑ | |||||||
| 12 | D | L | 4.0 | PCC | ▀↑ | x | ▀↑ | ▄↓ | ▀↑ | ▄↓ | ▄↓ | |
| R | 0.8 | AMHN | x | ▄↓ | ▄↓ | x | ||||||
| 13 | E | L | 5.0 | PCC | NI | ▄↓ | x | ▀↑ | NI | ▄↓ | ||
| R | 3.0 | PCC | NI | ▄↓ | ▄↓ | ▀↑ | NI | ▀↑ | ▀↑ | ▀↑ | ||
| 14 | F | L | 0.8 | AMHM | NI | x | x | x | NI | ▀↑ | x | ▄↓ |
| R | 3.0 | PCC | NI | ▀↑ | x | NI | ▄↓ | ▀↑ | ||||
| 15 | G | L | 2.5 | PCC | ▀↓ | ▀↑ | ▀↑ | ▄↑ | ||||
| R | 0.6 | AMHM | ▀↑ | ▄↓ | ▀↑ | ▄↓ | ▀↓ | |||||
| 16 | H | R | 1.5 | PCC | ▄↓ | ▀↑ | NI | |||||
| 17 | I | L | 0.2 | AMHN | NI | x | ▀↓ | NI | NI | NI | ||
| R | 0.8 | AMHM | NI | ▀↓ | ▄↓ | NI | NI | NI | ||||
| 18 | J | L | 4.2 | PCC | ▄↓ | ▄↑ | NI | ▄↓ | ▀↑ | NI | ||
| R | 2.0 | PCC | ▀↑ | ▀↓ | NI | ▀↑ | ▄↓ | NI |
Pt, patient; L, left adrenal gland; R, right adrenal gland; histologic growth patterns: N, nodular; D, diffuse; M, mixed nodular and diffuse.
▀↑, Loss of upper allele; ▀↓, loss of lower allele; NI, not informative; x, no data; u, unknown.
Overall LOH Results: AMHs versus PCCs.
| Locus | AMH (%) | PCC (%) |
|---|---|---|
| 1p13 | 44 | 100 |
| 1p36 | 60 | 64 |
| 3p | 67 | 36 |
| 3q | 63 | 92 |
Figure 1Left panel displays the LOH patterns of germ-line DNA (upper), PCC DNA (middle), and AMH DNA (lower) of case 14, for chromosome 3q24. Loss is indicated by the arrow. Note that the PCC and AMH show different LOH patterns. Right panel shows the sequences of a healthy control DNA (control) and the germ-line DNA, PCC DNA, and AMH DNA of case 9. Germ-line DNA displays the p.Cys634Arg, T>C mutation in an equal ratio, whereas both PCC DNAs show a higher signal of the mutation (C) compared to the wild-type signal (T), indicating amplification of the mutant allele.