Literature DB >> 25378225

An observational, real-life safety study of a 5-grass pollen sublingual tablet in children and adolescents.

Peter Eberle1, Helmut Brueck, Ralph Gall, Meike Hadler, Jochen Sieber, Efstrathios Karagiannis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The safety and efficacy of pre- and coseasonal sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SLIT) with a 5-grass pollen sublingual tablet have been demonstrated in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) in children and adolescents. Observational, 'real-life' studies can usefully complement the results of RCTs.
METHODS: A prospective, open-label, observational, multicentre post-marketing study of children and adolescents (aged 5-17, with grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis) treated with the 5-grass pollen sublingual tablet was performed between June 2009 and January 2011 in Germany. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded during consultations with the investigating physicians; AEs judged to have at least a possible causal link to the tablet were classified as adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
RESULTS: Eight hundred and forty-nine patients were enrolled (by 207 investigating physicians), 829 (mean ± s.d. age: 10.9 ± 3.3 yr) completed the study without major protocol deviations, and 796 were fully documented with respect to AEs. Ninety-four of the 796 patients (11.8%) experienced at least one ADR on the first day of SLIT and 218 (27.4%) experienced at least one ADR during the study. Four hundred and sixty-six of the 596 ADRs (78.2%) were mild or moderate. The most common ADRs were throat irritation (19.1% of the reactions), oral paresthesia (8.2%), oral pruritus (6.5%) and oedema mouth (6.2%). Serious ADRs occurred in five patients. No epinephrine use was reported. Seventy-six of the 829 patients (9.2%) discontinued SLIT due to AEs. Tolerability was judged to be good or very good by patients (84.7%), parents (87.0%) and investigators (89.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, pre- and coseasonal treatment with a 5-grass pollen sublingual tablet is safe and well tolerated in children and adolescents.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescents; allergen immunotherapy; allergic rhinitis; children; grass pollen sublingual tablet; safety; sublingual immunotherapy; tolerability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25378225     DOI: 10.1111/pai.12298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 0905-6157            Impact factor:   6.377


  6 in total

Review 1.  Sublingual immunotherapy for pediatric allergic rhinitis: The clinical evidence.

Authors:  Dimitri Poddighe; Amelia Licari; Silvia Caimmi; Gian Luigi Marseglia
Journal:  World J Clin Pediatr       Date:  2016-02-08

2.  "The value of pre- and co-seasonal sublingual immunotherapy in pollen-induced allergic rhinoconjunctivitis".

Authors:  Pascal Demoly; Moises A Calderon; Thomas B Casale; Hans-Jørgen Malling; Ulrich Wahn
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 5.871

3.  Satisfaction and quality of life of allergic patients following sublingual five-grass pollen tablet immunotherapy in Spain.

Authors:  Darío Antolín-Amerigo; Isabel A Tabar; Maria Del Mar Fernández-Nieto; Anna M Callejo-Melgosa; Francisco J Muñoz-Bellido; José C Martínez-Alonso; Jorge D Méndez-Alcalde; Marta Reche; Ana Rodríguez-Trabado; Ana Rosado-Ingelmo; Alicia Alonso-Gómez; Rosa Blanco-González; José A Alvarez-Fernandez; Isabel Botella; Ana Valls; Mercedes Cimarra; Carlos Blanco
Journal:  Drugs Context       Date:  2017-11-29

4.  Management of Grass Pollen Allergy with 5-Grass Pollen Tablet: Results of a 2-Year Real-Life Study.

Authors:  Kija Shah-Hosseini; Eva-Maria Krudewig; Meike Hadler; Efstrathios Karagiannis; Ralph Mösges
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  Update about Oralair® as a treatment for grass pollen allergic rhinitis.

Authors:  L Klimek; R Brehler; R Mösges; P Demoly; J Mullol; D Y Wang; R E O'Hehir; A Didier; M Kopp; C Bos; E Karagiannis
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.526

Review 6.  How does the efficacy and safety of Oralair(®) compare to other products on the market?

Authors:  Désirée Larenas-Linnemann
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.423

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.