Literature DB >> 25378106

Device-based in vitro techniques for mechanical stimulation of vascular cells: a review.

Caleb A Davis, Steve Zambrano, Pratima Anumolu, Alicia C B Allen, Leonardo Sonoqui, Michael R Moreno.   

Abstract

The most common cause of death in the developed world is cardiovascular disease. For decades, this has provided a powerful motivation to study the effects of mechanical forces on vascular cells in a controlled setting, since these cells have been implicated in the development of disease. Early efforts in the 1970 s included the first use of a parallel-plate flow system to apply shear stress to endothelial cells (ECs) and the development of uniaxial substrate stretching techniques (Krueger et al., 1971, "An in Vitro Study of Flow Response by Cells," J. Biomech., 4(1), pp. 31-36 and Meikle et al., 1979, "Rabbit Cranial Sutures in Vitro: A New Experimental Model for Studying the Response of Fibrous Joints to Mechanical Stress," Calcif. Tissue Int., 28(2), pp. 13-144). Since then, a multitude of in vitro devices have been designed and developed for mechanical stimulation of vascular cells and tissues in an effort to better understand their response to in vivo physiologic mechanical conditions. This article reviews the functional attributes of mechanical bioreactors developed in the 21st century, including their major advantages and disadvantages. Each of these systems has been categorized in terms of their primary loading modality: fluid shear stress (FSS), substrate distention, combined distention and fluid shear, or other applied forces. The goal of this article is to provide researchers with a survey of useful methodologies that can be adapted to studies in this area, and to clarify future possibilities for improved research methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25378106     DOI: 10.1115/1.4029016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  13 in total

1.  Design, fabrication and characterization of a pure uniaxial microloading system for biologic testing.

Authors:  Jonathan D King; Spencer L York; Marnie M Saunders
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  MechanoBioTester: A Decoupled Multistimulus Cell Culture Device for Studying Complex Microenvironments In Vitro.

Authors:  Bryan D James; Nicolas Montoya; Josephine Allen
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-05-08

Review 3.  In Vitro Flow Chamber Design for the Study of Endothelial Cell (Patho)Physiology.

Authors:  Meghan E Fallon; Rick Mathews; Monica T Hinds
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  A Pulsatile Flow System to Engineer Aneurysm and Atherosclerosis Mimetic Extracellular Matrix.

Authors:  Vahid Hosseini; Anna Mallone; Nima Mirkhani; Jerome Noir; Mehdi Salek; Francesco Silvio Pasqualini; Simone Schuerle; Ali Khademhosseini; Simon P Hoerstrup; Viola Vogel
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 16.806

5.  BEaTS-α an open access 3D printed device for in vitro electromechanical stimulation of human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  David Cortes; Christopher D McTiernan; Marc Ruel; Walfre Franco; Cencen Chu; Wenbin Liang; Erik J Suuronen; Emilio I Alarcon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sex-Specific Response to Combinations of Shear Stress and Substrate Stiffness by Endothelial Cells In Vitro.

Authors:  Bryan D James; Josephine B Allen
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 11.092

7.  Preclinical techniques to investigate exercise training in vascular pathophysiology.

Authors:  Gurneet S Sangha; Craig J Goergen; Steven J Prior; Sushant M Ranadive; Alisa M Clyne
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 5.125

Review 8.  Vascular Mechanobiology: Towards Control of In Situ Regeneration.

Authors:  Eline E van Haaften; Carlijn V C Bouten; Nicholas A Kurniawan
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  An ultra-fast mechanically active cell culture substrate.

Authors:  Alexandre Poulin; Matthias Imboden; Francesca Sorba; Serge Grazioli; Cristina Martin-Olmos; Samuel Rosset; Herbert Shea
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Computational Characterization of The Dish-In-A-Dish, A High Yield Culture Platform for Endothelial Shear Stress Studies on the Orbital Shaker.

Authors:  Rob Driessen; Feihu Zhao; Sandra Hofmann; Carlijn Bouten; Cecilia Sahlgren; Oscar Stassen
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.523

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.