Literature DB >> 25377969

Nasal reconstruction with the paramedian forehead flap using the aesthetic subunits principle.

Victor Diniz de Pochat1, Nivaldo Alonso, Emilie Barreto Ribeiro, Bruno Suffredini Figueiredo, Eduarda Nilo de Magaldi, Marcelo Sacramento Cunha, José Valber Lima Meneses.   

Abstract

Reconstruction of nasal defects is challenging because it requires covering skin, supporting framework, and lining. Traditionally, the forehead flaps are transferred in 2 stages; however, it can be accomplished in a single stage or in 3 stages. Few published studies are available about the paramedian forehead flap using the intermediate stage (3-stage) and the aesthetic subunits principle. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the paramedian forehead flap in 2 and 3 stages for nasal reconstructions, highlighting the indications, complications, and technical details and evaluating the patient's satisfaction through a questionnaire about the quality of life (Derriford Appearance Scale 24). A retrospective review was performed between 2011 and 2013 for a consecutive series of 11 patients who underwent nasal reconstructions using the paramedian forehead flap in 2 or 3 stages. All preoperative and postoperative data were collected, and outcomes were also assessed through a questionnaire about the patients' postoperative quality of life. The causes of nasal lesions varied among skin cancer, trauma, and infection. Two-stage paramedian forehead flap reconstruction was performed upon 4 patients, whereas the 3-stage reconstruction was performed for 7 patients. Of the 10 survey respondents, 6 were highly satisfied (score of 11-27), and 4 were moderately satisfied (score of 28-44), whereas no one was dissatisfied after his/her surgical nasal reconstruction procedure. Whether the approach is accomplished in 2 or 3 stages, all areas of the reconstructed nose must be firmly supported. Applying the nasal subunits principle seems to contribute to an overall satisfied population in our study, according to the score obtained by the questionnaire about quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25377969     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  3 in total

Review 1.  Approach to Reconstruction of Nasal Defects.

Authors:  Berkay Başağaoğlu; Kausar Ali; Pierce Hollier; Renata S Maricevich
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  Effectiveness of Nasolabial Flap Versus Paramedian Forehead Flap for Nasal Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sourabh Shankar Chakraborty; Akhil Dhanesh Goel; Ranjit Kumar Sahu; Manojit Midya; Sudeshna Acharya; Neha Shakrawal
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Application of FACE-Q and NOSE in Nasal Reconstruction with Paramedian Frontal Flap after Skin Cancer Resection.

Authors:  Vitor Penteado Figueiredo Pagotto; Rafael Mamoru Carneiro Tutihashi; Renan Diego Americo Ribeiro; Giulia Godoy Takahashi; Cristina Pires Camargo; Fábio de Freitas Busnardo; Rolf Gemperli
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-04-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.