Literature DB >> 25377937

Applicability of the polynomial chaos expansion method for personalization of a cardiovascular pulse wave propagation model.

W Huberts1, W P Donders, T Delhaas, F N van de Vosse.   

Abstract

Patient-specific modeling requires model personalization, which can be achieved in an efficient manner by parameter fixing and parameter prioritization. An efficient variance-based method is using generalized polynomial chaos expansion (gPCE), but it has not been applied in the context of model personalization, nor has it ever been compared with standard variance-based methods for models with many parameters. In this work, we apply the gPCE method to a previously reported pulse wave propagation model and compare the conclusions for model personalization with that of a reference analysis performed with Saltelli's efficient Monte Carlo method. We furthermore differentiate two approaches for obtaining the expansion coefficients: one based on spectral projection (gPCE-P) and one based on least squares regression (gPCE-R). It was found that in general the gPCE yields similar conclusions as the reference analysis but at much lower cost, as long as the polynomial metamodel does not contain unnecessary high order terms. Furthermore, the gPCE-R approach generally yielded better results than gPCE-P. The weak performance of the gPCE-P can be attributed to the assessment of the expansion coefficients using the Smolyak algorithm, which might be hampered by the high number of model parameters and/or by possible non-smoothness in the output space.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  model personalization; patient-specific modeling; polynomial chaos expansion; sensitivity analysis; uncertainty quantification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25377937     DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2040-7939            Impact factor:   2.747


  6 in total

1.  Influence of image segmentation on one-dimensional fluid dynamics predictions in the mouse pulmonary arteries.

Authors:  Mitchel J Colebank; L Mihaela Paun; M Umar Qureshi; Naomi Chesler; Dirk Husmeier; Mette S Olufsen; Laura Ellwein Fix
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Handling of uncertainty in medical data using machine learning and probability theory techniques: a review of 30 years (1991-2020).

Authors:  Roohallah Alizadehsani; Mohamad Roshanzamir; Sadiq Hussain; Abbas Khosravi; Afsaneh Koohestani; Mohammad Hossein Zangooei; Moloud Abdar; Adham Beykikhoshk; Afshin Shoeibi; Assef Zare; Maryam Panahiazar; Saeid Nahavandi; Dipti Srinivasan; Amir F Atiya; U Rajendra Acharya
Journal:  Ann Oper Res       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 4.820

3.  A constitutive model for the time-dependent, nonlinear stress response of fibrin networks.

Authors:  Thomas H S van Kempen; Gerrit W M Peters; Frans N van de Vosse
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2015-01-25

4.  A constitutive model for developing blood clots with various compositions and their nonlinear viscoelastic behavior.

Authors:  Thomas H S van Kempen; Wouter P Donders; Frans N van de Vosse; Gerrit W M Peters
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2015-06-05

5.  Uncertainty quantification and sensitivity analysis of an arterial wall mechanics model for evaluation of vascular drug therapies.

Authors:  Maarten H G Heusinkveld; Sjeng Quicken; Robert J Holtackers; Wouter Huberts; Koen D Reesink; Tammo Delhaas; Bart Spronck
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2017-07-28

6.  Intima heterogeneity in stress assessment of atherosclerotic plaques.

Authors:  Ali C Akyildiz; Lambert Speelman; Bas van Velzen; Raoul R F Stevens; Antonius F W van der Steen; Wouter Huberts; Frank J H Gijsen
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.906

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.