Literature DB >> 25377508

Cueing others' memories.

Jonathan G Tullis1, Aaron S Benjamin.   

Abstract

Many situations require us to generate external cues to support later retrieval from memory. For instance, we create file names in order to cue our memory to a file's contents, and instructors create lecture slides to remember what points to make during classes. We even generate cues for others when we remind friends of shared experiences or send colleagues a computer file that is named in such a way so as to remind them of its contents. Here we explore how and how well learners tailor retrieval cues for different intended recipients. Across three experiments, subjects generated verbal cues for a list of target words for themselves or for others. Learners generated cues for others by increasing the normative cue-to-target associative strength but also by increasing the number of other words their cues point to, relative to cues that they generated for themselves. This strategy was effective: such cues supported higher levels of recall for others than cues generated for oneself. Generating cues for others also required more time than generating cues for oneself. Learners responded to the differential demands of cue generation for others by effortfully excluding personal, episodic knowledge and including knowledge that they estimate to be broadly shared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25377508     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-014-0478-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  25 in total

1.  On the effectiveness of self-paced learning.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Consequences of restudy choices in younger and older learners.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

3.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

4.  Agenda-based regulation of study-time allocation: when agendas override item-based monitoring.

Authors:  Robert Ariel; John Dunlosky; Heather Bailey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2009-08

5.  Metacognitive control over the distribution of practice: when is spacing preferred?

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Michael S Cohen; Meghan L Davis; Amy C Moors
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Accessing the particular from the general: the power of distinctiveness in the context of organization.

Authors:  R R Hunt; R E Smith
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-03

7.  Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-08

8.  Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation.

Authors:  L K Son; J Metcalfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  "Inner speech" and "external speech": characteristics and communication effectiveness of socially and nonsocially encoded messages.

Authors:  R M Krauss; P S Vivekananthan; S Weinheimer
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1968-08

10.  Self-pacing study of faces of different races: metacognitive control over study does not eliminate the cross-race recognition effect.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Aaron S Benjamin; Xiping Liu
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-08
View more
  3 in total

1.  Predicting others' knowledge: Knowledge estimation as cue utilization.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11

2.  Conflict and metacognitive control: the mismatch-monitoring hypothesis of how others' knowledge states affect recall.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2015-08-06

Review 3.  Using Self-Generated Cues to Facilitate Recall: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Rebecca L Wheeler; Fiona Gabbert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-27
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.