AIMS: This population pharmacokinetic analysis of the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib assessed the feasibility of switching from body surface area (BSA)-based to fixed dosing, and the impact of baseline covariates on ixazomib pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Data were pooled from 226 adult patients with multiple myeloma, lymphoma or solid tumours in four phase 1 studies, in which ixazomib dosing (oral/intravenous, once/twice weekly) was based on BSA. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was undertaken using nonmem version 7.2. RESULTS: Ixazomib pharmacokinetics were well described by a three compartment model with first order absorption and linear elimination. Ixazomib was absorbed rapidly (Ka 0.5 h(-1)), with dose- and time-independent pharmacokinetics. Estimated absolute bioavailability and clearance were 60% and 2l h(-1), respectively. Although a small effect of BSA (range 1.3-2.6 m(2)) was observed on the peripheral volume of distribution (V4), reducing the corresponding inter-individual variability by 12.9%, there was no relationship between BSA and ixazomib clearance (the parameter that dictates total systemic exposure following fixed dosing). Consistently, based on simulations (n = 1000), median AUCs (including interquartile range) were similar after BSA-based (2.23 mg m(-2)) and fixed (4 mg) oral dosing with no trend in simulated AUC vs. BSA for fixed dosing (P = 0.42). No other covariates, including creatinine clearance (22-213.7 ml min(-1)) and age (23-86 years), influenced ixazomib pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis supports a switch from BSA-based to fixed dosing, without dose modification for mild/moderate renal impairment or age, in future adult studies of ixazomib, simplifying dosing guidance and clinical development.
AIMS: This population pharmacokinetic analysis of the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib assessed the feasibility of switching from body surface area (BSA)-based to fixed dosing, and the impact of baseline covariates on ixazomib pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Data were pooled from 226 adult patients with multiple myeloma, lymphoma or solid tumours in four phase 1 studies, in which ixazomib dosing (oral/intravenous, once/twice weekly) was based on BSA. Population pharmacokinetic modelling was undertaken using nonmem version 7.2. RESULTS:Ixazomib pharmacokinetics were well described by a three compartment model with first order absorption and linear elimination. Ixazomib was absorbed rapidly (Ka 0.5 h(-1)), with dose- and time-independent pharmacokinetics. Estimated absolute bioavailability and clearance were 60% and 2l h(-1), respectively. Although a small effect of BSA (range 1.3-2.6 m(2)) was observed on the peripheral volume of distribution (V4), reducing the corresponding inter-individual variability by 12.9%, there was no relationship between BSA and ixazomib clearance (the parameter that dictates total systemic exposure following fixed dosing). Consistently, based on simulations (n = 1000), median AUCs (including interquartile range) were similar after BSA-based (2.23 mg m(-2)) and fixed (4 mg) oral dosing with no trend in simulated AUC vs. BSA for fixed dosing (P = 0.42). No other covariates, including creatinine clearance (22-213.7 ml min(-1)) and age (23-86 years), influenced ixazomib pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis supports a switch from BSA-based to fixed dosing, without dose modification for mild/moderate renal impairment or age, in future adult studies of ixazomib, simplifying dosing guidance and clinical development.
Authors: Sharyn D Baker; Jaap Verweij; Eric K Rowinsky; Ross C Donehower; Jan H M Schellens; Louise B Grochow; Alex Sparreboom Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-12-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Pieter Sonneveld; Michael W Schuster; David Irwin; Edward A Stadtmauer; Thierry Facon; Jean-Luc Harousseau; Dina Ben-Yehuda; Sagar Lonial; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Donna Reece; Jesus F San-Miguel; Joan Bladé; Mario Boccadoro; Jamie Cavenagh; William S Dalton; Anthony L Boral; Dixie L Esseltine; Jane B Porter; David Schenkein; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-06-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Jagannath; B Barlogie; J Berenson; D Siegel; D Irwin; P G Richardson; R Niesvizky; R Alexanian; S A Limentani; M Alsina; J Adams; M Kauffman; D-L Esseltine; D P Schenkein; K C Anderson Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Felix E de Jongh; James M Gallo; Meiyu Shen; Jaap Verweij; Alex Sparreboom Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2004-04-30 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Bart Barlogie; James Berenson; Seema Singhal; Sundar Jagannath; David Irwin; S Vincent Rajkumar; Gordan Srkalovic; Melissa Alsina; Raymond Alexanian; David Siegel; Robert Z Orlowski; David Kuter; Steven A Limentani; Stephanie Lee; Teru Hideshima; Dixie-Lee Esseltine; Michael Kauffman; Julian Adams; David P Schenkein; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-06-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: G R Tundo; D Sbardella; A M Santoro; A Coletta; F Oddone; G Grasso; D Milardi; P M Lacal; S Marini; R Purrello; G Graziani; M Coletta Journal: Pharmacol Ther Date: 2020-05-19 Impact factor: 12.310
Authors: Neeraj Gupta; Paul M Diderichsen; Michael J Hanley; Deborah Berg; Helgi van de Velde; R Donald Harvey; Karthik Venkatakrishnan Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 6.447