Qinghang Meng1, Maureen Mongan1, Vinicius Carreira1, Hisaka Kurita1, Chia-Yang Liu2, Winston W-Y Kao2, Ying Xia3. 1. Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States. 2. Ophthalmology, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States. 3. Department of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States Ophthalmology, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Mammalian eye development requires temporary fusion of the upper and lower eyelids in embryogenesis. Failure of lid closure in mice leads to an eye open at birth (EOB) phenotype. Many genetic mutant strains develop this phenotype and studies of the mutants lead to a better understanding of the signaling mechanisms of morphogenesis. The present study investigates the roles of lid closure in eye development. METHODS: Seven mutant mouse strains were generated by different gene ablation strategies that inactivated distinct signaling pathways. These mice, including systemic ablation of Map3k1 and Dkk2, ocular surface epithelium (OSE) knockout of c-Jun and Egfr, conditional knockout of Shp2 in stratified epithelium (SE), as well as the Map3k1/Jnk1 and Map3k1/Rhoa compound mutants, all exhibited defective eyelid closure. The embryonic and postnatal eyes in these mice were characterized by histology and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Some eye abnormalities, such as smaller lens in the Map3k1-null mice and Harderian gland hypoplasia in the Dkk2-null mice, appeared to be mutant strain-specific, whereas other abnormalities were seen in all mutants examined. The common defects included corneal erosion/ulceration, meibomian gland hypoplasia, truncation of the eyelid tarsal muscles, failure of levator palpebrae superioris (LPS) extension into the upper eyelid and misplacement of the inferior oblique (IO) muscle and inferior rectus (IR) muscle. The muscle defects were traced to the prenatal fetuses. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to providing a protective barrier for the ocular surface, eyelid closure in embryogenesis is required for the development of ocular adnexa, including eyelid and extraocular muscles. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
PURPOSE:Mammalian eye development requires temporary fusion of the upper and lower eyelids in embryogenesis. Failure of lid closure in mice leads to an eye open at birth (EOB) phenotype. Many genetic mutant strains develop this phenotype and studies of the mutants lead to a better understanding of the signaling mechanisms of morphogenesis. The present study investigates the roles of lid closure in eye development. METHODS: Seven mutant mouse strains were generated by different gene ablation strategies that inactivated distinct signaling pathways. These mice, including systemic ablation of Map3k1 and Dkk2, ocular surface epithelium (OSE) knockout of c-Jun and Egfr, conditional knockout of Shp2 in stratified epithelium (SE), as well as the Map3k1/Jnk1 and Map3k1/Rhoa compound mutants, all exhibited defective eyelid closure. The embryonic and postnatal eyes in these mice were characterized by histology and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Some eye abnormalities, such as smaller lens in the Map3k1-null mice and Harderian gland hypoplasia in the Dkk2-null mice, appeared to be mutant strain-specific, whereas other abnormalities were seen in all mutants examined. The common defects included corneal erosion/ulceration, meibomian gland hypoplasia, truncation of the eyelid tarsal muscles, failure of levator palpebrae superioris (LPS) extension into the upper eyelid and misplacement of the inferior oblique (IO) muscle and inferior rectus (IR) muscle. The muscle defects were traced to the prenatal fetuses. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to providing a protective barrier for the ocular surface, eyelid closure in embryogenesis is required for the development of ocular adnexa, including eyelid and extraocular muscles. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
Authors: Mireille Montcouquiol; Rivka A Rachel; Pamela J Lanford; Neal G Copeland; Nancy A Jenkins; Matthew W Kelley Journal: Nature Date: 2003-04-30 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: John A Curtin; Elizabeth Quint; Vicky Tsipouri; Ruth M Arkell; Bruce Cattanach; Andrew J Copp; Deborah J Henderson; Nigel Spurr; Philip Stanier; Elizabeth M Fisher; Patrick M Nolan; Karen P Steel; Steve D M Brown; Ian C Gray; Jennifer N Murdoch Journal: Curr Biol Date: 2003-07-01 Impact factor: 10.834
Authors: Lin Zhang; Wei Wang; Yasuhito Hayashi; James V Jester; David E Birk; Min Gao; Chia-Yang Liu; Winston W-Y Kao; Michael Karin; Ying Xia Journal: EMBO J Date: 2003-09-01 Impact factor: 11.598
Authors: Claire R Weston; Anthony Wong; J Perry Hall; Mary E P Goad; Richard A Flavell; Roger J Davis Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2003-05-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Xiaowei Lu; Annette G M Borchers; Christine Jolicoeur; Helen Rayburn; Julie C Baker; Marc Tessier-Lavigne Journal: Nature Date: 2004-07-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Rainer Zenz; Harald Scheuch; Paul Martin; Carsten Frank; Robert Eferl; Lukas Kenner; Maria Sibilia; Erwin F Wagner Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 12.270
Authors: Michelle Curtain; Caleb S Heffner; Dennis M Maddox; Polyxeni Gudis; Leah Rae Donahue; Stephen A Murray Journal: Mamm Genome Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 2.957
Authors: Zinaida Dedeić; Gopinath Sutendra; Ying Hu; Kathryn Chung; Elizabeth A Slee; Michael J White; Felix Y Zhou; Robert D Goldin; David J P Ferguson; Debra McAndrew; Jurgen E Schneider; Xin Lu Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 15.828